Re: what hook to use when setting headers depending on current folder?

2000-07-15 Thread Rejo Zenger
++ 26/06/00 21:05 +0200 - Virginie [ ML ]: When using a send-hook i don't know how to tell Mutt it should use the settings depending on the folder i'm in. When using a folder-hook it seems that the settings get overwritten by send-hooks when actually writing the message. I had the same

Re: set variable according to some (other) variable

2000-07-15 Thread Byrial Jensen
On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 01:16:39 +0100, Tommy Wareing wrote: I'm trying to work out whether I can create a single macro to toggle index format between two values. Currently, I've got two keys bound: macro index "\Cw" ':set index_format="%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15L (%4l) %s"^M' "View Lists"

Re: multipart/alternative formatting

2000-07-15 Thread Byrial Jensen
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 21:00:21 -0700, Anton Graham wrote: I still think that text/plain should be just that: plain :) It is. The Quoted Printable encoding must not have lines longer than 76 characters, and the encoder have to insert the soft breaks when it encodes longer lines then that.

Re: multipart/alternative formatting

2000-07-15 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Byrial Jensen proclaimed on mutt-users that: which each paragraph may be rewrapped by the receiving MUA. It uses the context type "text/plain; format=flowed". Mutt doesn't support this, but it may be a good idea to implement it. "The Text/Plain Format Parameter" is described in RFC 2646. The

Re: SMTP

2000-07-15 Thread wari
Allright, although a bitch to compile on BSD, but got it working.. Although this allows me to use $envelope_from to whatever I like, but the end result is wierd, like this mail... If you looked at the headers, teh first line is From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Didn't work the way I want to ;) The

Re: SMTP

2000-07-15 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] proclaimed on mutt-users that: Allright, although a bitch to compile on BSD, but got it working.. Although this allows me to use $envelope_from to whatever I like, but the end result is wierd, like this mail... If you looked at the headers, teh first line is Oy ... I just