Re: Is there a Pine-to-Mutt FAQ?

2000-10-20 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 20 Oct 2000: > Anyway, I was wondering if there is a Pine-to-Mutt conversion HOWTO or FAQ. I've not heard of one, but I never did use Pine much so I haven't even looked, or paid much attention. > I'm _sure_ that would be needed. Right, one would be

Is there a Pine-to-Mutt FAQ?

2000-10-20 Thread Pekka Savola
Hi, I've been trying to get used to Mutt. It's not too easy when you have like 5 years of Pine experience behind you. Anyway, I was wondering if there is a Pine-to-Mutt conversion HOWTO or FAQ. I'm _sure_ that would be needed. I sure as hell needed one myself, and had to go through this maili

Moving 'PGP output follows' to the bottom

2000-10-20 Thread Pekka Savola
Hi, I've been testing Mutt, trying to get it quite close to what I'm used to w/ Pine. One question about PGP; I get the following at the top of the PGP messages: [-- PGP output follows (current time: Fri Oct 20 23:04:51 2000) --] < cut gpg messages > [-- End of PGP output --] [-- The followin

Re: color

2000-10-20 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 08:43:13PM +0300, Eugene Paskevich wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 10:02:31AM -0700, Mike E wrote: > > System: FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE [using ncurses 1.8.6/ache] > You'd better obtain more recent version of ncurses and recompile. > I have version 4.2 while you have

Re: editing mails, then save it instead of sending

2000-10-20 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Daniel J Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 20 Oct 2000: > Hmm... the 1.0.1 functionality seems more useful to me. Is there any > way to edit and resend a message in 1.2.5? Sure, esc-e (the default key binding for it anyway), the function is called resend-message. The original 1.0 function

Re: editing mails, then save it instead of sending

2000-10-20 Thread Daniel J Peng
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 04:25:32PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > Yes, upgrade to 1.2.5, which has a nice "edit-message" function. > > Actually, the same functionality is in 1.0.1 too, when you select > a message for "edit and resend", you can use the w(rite) command > to write it back to the fol

Re: color

2000-10-20 Thread Thomas E. Dickey
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Mike E wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 12:01:13PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote: > > Sounds like your curses lib doesn't support color. You might try > > ncurses > > here is the full output of mutt -v that version "does", but mutt's configure script does not recognize i

Re: color

2000-10-20 Thread Eugene Paskevich
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 10:02:31AM -0700, Mike E wrote: > System: FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE [using ncurses 1.8.6/ache] You'd better obtain more recent version of ncurses and recompile. I have version 4.2 while you have only 1.8.6. -- Eugene Paskevich | *==(--- |

Re: color

2000-10-20 Thread Larry Rosenman
* Mike E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001020 12:14]: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 12:01:13PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote: > > Sounds like your curses lib doesn't support color. You might try > > ncurses As I said, the curses lib doesn't support color... Here is my mutt -v: Mutt 1.3.10i (2000-10-11) Co

Re: color

2000-10-20 Thread Mike E
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 12:01:13PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote: > Sounds like your curses lib doesn't support color. You might try > ncurses here is the full output of mutt -v Mutt 1.2.5i (2000-07-28) Copyright (C) 1996-2000 Michael R. Elkins and others. Mutt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRA

Re: color

2000-10-20 Thread Larry Rosenman
Sounds like your curses lib doesn't support color. You might try ncurses * Mike E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001020 11:56]: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 10:29:17AM -0600, Harold Oga wrote: > > On 20 Oct 2000, at 22:50, Anthony Liu wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 02:56:30AM -0700, Mike E wrote: >

Re: color

2000-10-20 Thread Mike E
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 10:29:17AM -0600, Harold Oga wrote: > On 20 Oct 2000, at 22:50, Anthony Liu wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 02:56:30AM -0700, Mike E wrote: > > > I'm trying to set up color with mutt (1.2.5i) but I am getting > > > "color: unknown command" errors from my muttrc. Is ther

Re: color

2000-10-20 Thread Harold Oga
On 20 Oct 2000, at 22:50, Anthony Liu wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 02:56:30AM -0700, Mike E wrote: > > I'm trying to set up color with mutt (1.2.5i) but I am getting > > "color: unknown command" errors from my muttrc. Is there some trick > > that I'm missing? > > > Perhaps you should try col

Re: color

2000-10-20 Thread Mike E
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 10:50:03PM +0800, Anthony Liu wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 02:56:30AM -0700, Mike E wrote: > > I'm trying to set up color with mutt (1.2.5i) but I am getting > > "color: unknown command" errors from my muttrc. Is there some trick > > that I'm missing? > > > Perhaps yo

Re: color

2000-10-20 Thread Anthony Liu
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 02:56:30AM -0700, Mike E wrote: > I'm trying to set up color with mutt (1.2.5i) but I am getting > "color: unknown command" errors from my muttrc. Is there some trick > that I'm missing? > Perhaps you should try colour instead :) Seriously, can you post a few lines befor

Re: FEATURE-REQUEST: mutt looks for PGPPASS environment variable

2000-10-20 Thread Bob Bell
From a bash prompt, try running: COLUMNS= ps ae | grep mutt and see if you don't change your mind about using PGPPASS. -- Bob Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - "Just don't create a file called -rf. :-)" --

Re: editing mails, then save it instead of sending

2000-10-20 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Thomas Guettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 20 Oct 2000: > I use mutt since some months and has all the features I can > imagine. Great. But one thing I am missing: Sometimes I want to edit a > mail, and then save it. I think it is only possible to edit and resend > it. (OK, I could resent i

Re: FEATURE-REQUEST: mutt looks for PGPPASS environment variable

2000-10-20 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2000-10-20 13:51:13 +0200, Daniel Kollar wrote: > I'm doing that. The environment is only active as long as mutt is > open. No one from outside can access it. That's your particular environment. However, mutt is designed in a way which makes it suitable for use on real multi-user systems. Yo

Re: FEATURE-REQUEST: mutt looks for PGPPASS environment variable

2000-10-20 Thread Dan Boger
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 01:51:13PM +0200, Daniel Kollar wrote: > In the PGP CmdLineGuide you will find a section about this. > There you can read that using this feature is safe when you use in in > a environment where no one else has access to it. > > I'm doing that. The environment is only acti

Re: GPG 1.0.3 and mutt

2000-10-20 Thread Lars Hecking
Dan Boger writes: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 05:02:57PM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > > I recently decided to try GnuPG after using only pgp2 off and on for > > some years. It was only after I downloaded it and played with it for a > > while, that I realised that version 1.0.3 was very recent.

Re: editing mails, then save it instead of sending

2000-10-20 Thread Dan Boger
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 11:00:01AM +0200, Thomas Guettler wrote: > I use mutt since some months and has all the features I can > imagine. Great. But one thing I am missing: Sometimes I want to edit a > mail, and then save it. I think it is only possible to edit and resend > it. (OK, I could resent

Re: GPG 1.0.3 and mutt

2000-10-20 Thread Dan Boger
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 05:02:57PM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > I recently decided to try GnuPG after using only pgp2 off and on for > some years. It was only after I downloaded it and played with it for a > while, that I realised that version 1.0.3 was very recent. I had got in > right at th

Re: FEATURE-REQUEST: mutt looks for PGPPASS environment variable

2000-10-20 Thread Daniel Kollar
> Don't do that. > > Storing the pgp pass phrase in an environment variable may have been > a valid option on MS-DOS computers. It isn't on Unix machines, > since the environment is not guaranteed to be confidential. I'm working on unix. In the PGP CmdLineGuide you will find a section about th

Re: GPG 1.0.3 and mutt

2000-10-20 Thread Charles Curley
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 05:02:57PM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > I recently decided to try GnuPG after using only pgp2 off and on for > some years. It was only after I downloaded it and played with it for a > while, that I realised that version 1.0.3 was very recent. I had got in > right at th

Re: FEATURE-REQUEST: mutt looks for PGPPASS environment variable

2000-10-20 Thread Thomas Roessler
Don't do that. Storing the pgp pass phrase in an environment variable may have been a valid option on MS-DOS computers. It isn't on Unix machines, since the environment is not guaranteed to be confidential. Also, what's the point in using a shell script like the one below? - There is no reason

color

2000-10-20 Thread Mike E
I'm trying to set up color with mutt (1.2.5i) but I am getting "color: unknown command" errors from my muttrc. Is there some trick that I'm missing? Mike -- Mike Erickson http://www.quidquam.com/ "Hatred is the coward's revenge for being intimidated" - George Bernard Sh

Re: GPG 1.0.3 and mutt

2000-10-20 Thread raf
Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > I recently decided to try GnuPG after using only pgp2 off and on for > some years. It was only after I downloaded it and played with it for a > while, that I realised that version 1.0.3 was very recent. I had got in > right at the beginning of a new version. This new ve

Re: editing mails, then save it instead of sending

2000-10-20 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Thomas Guettler proclaimed on mutt-users that: > mail, and then save it. I think it is only possible to edit and resend > it. (OK, I could resent it to myself, but that's not a nice solution) > Has someone an solution? You can postpone messages. mallet@mjollnir~> grep postpone .muttrc set

editing mails, then save it instead of sending

2000-10-20 Thread Thomas Guettler
I use mutt since some months and has all the features I can imagine. Great. But one thing I am missing: Sometimes I want to edit a mail, and then save it. I think it is only possible to edit and resend it. (OK, I could resent it to myself, but that's not a nice solution) Has someone an solution?

FEATURE-REQUEST: mutt looks for PGPPASS environment variable

2000-10-20 Thread Daniel Kollar
Hello mutt-developers, here is a feature request for future versions of mutt: Mutt looks for the PGPPASS environment variable. If this is set, then no passphrase is needed to be send to pgp program, because pgp looks for the PGPPASS variable by itself. Mutt will also not ask the user for the pas

GPG 1.0.3 and mutt

2000-10-20 Thread Brian Salter-Duke
I recently decided to try GnuPG after using only pgp2 off and on for some years. It was only after I downloaded it and played with it for a while, that I realised that version 1.0.3 was very recent. I had got in right at the beginning of a new version. This new version incorporates RSA which I und