On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 02:02:35AM -, mutt-users-digest wrote:
> --
>
> Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 22:27:10 +0900
> From: Joss Winn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: fetching mail in mutt and sendmail
>
> Hello,
> I would like to disable the sendmail daemon yet still be
On 010521, at 16:37:20, Chad Cunningham wrote
> Anyone have any idea why mutt would do this with some users and not
> others? What does mutt like the permissions on the mail spool to be?
If mutt has been compiled +USE_DOTLOCK, it needs to create a lock
file in the spool directory. If mutt_dotloc
As a variation on the vim invocation, I use this:
set editor ="vim +/^$
This puts me at the first blank line of the composition screen.
John
On 05/22/01, 07:23:43AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> I use
>
> set editor="/usr/bin/vim +':set textwidth=77' +':set wrap' +\`awk'/^$/ {print i+2;
John P. Verel [mutt-users] :
> My .vimrc has just this line for this problem:
> set textwidth=72
I use
set editor="/usr/bin/vim +':set textwidth=77' +':set wrap' +\`awk'/^$/ {print i+2;
exit} {i++}' %s\` %s"
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
mallet @ cluestick.org +
I've set $mbox to the same as $spoolfile, since I don't like a
seperate mbox in my ~.
I've noticed this prevents mbox-hooks from firing, for the messages
that I *do* want moved.
--
Jeremy M. Dolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PGP: 1024D/DC433DEE 494C 7A6E 19FB 026A 1F52 E0D5 5C5D 6228 DC43 3DEE
I have a mail folder of pending tasks and an archive of completed
tasks. I'm trying to make mutt save to =C by default, when I'm in =P.
folder-hook, intended to set per-folder options, doesn't work because
(AFAIK) there isn't a variable to set to specify the save to folder.
save-hook doesn't wor
Hi,
I recently noticed that our mail spool directory was modded word writeable
(with the sticky bit). To me this seemed like a bit of a bad idea, so I
asked around if there was a reason for this, and no one could think of
one. So I changed it to 755 to see what would break. mutt seems to be what
Hi...
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 11:28:29AM +0200, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
>> Vsevolod Volkov - Not real sure of the patch version (1.3.?) but he
>> makes it easy by putting it into a 'stable' directory.
>> Looks like a 2/21/01 update.
Yes, it works fine..
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 09:54:14PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 08:19:56PM +0200, Laurent Mirguet wrote:
>
> > Eudora removes the attachments from the mailboxes, which is nice to
> > keep small mailboxes. Is it possible to do the same with mutt ?
Ye
My .vimrc has just this line for this problem:
set textwidth=72
On 05/21/01, 08:04:36AM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
> Larry Hignight ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this effect on 05/18/2001:
> > I'm not sure how I missed this in the Mutt manual and some online tutorials,
> > but I have
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 08:19:56PM +0200, Laurent Mirguet wrote:
> Eudora removes the attachments from the mailboxes, which is nice to
> keep small mailboxes. Is it possible to do the same with mutt ?
Oh, and where are the attachments kept? Mutt doesn't really suffer from the
size of the individ
Hello,
Eudora removes the attachments from the mailboxes, which is nice to
keep small mailboxes. Is it possible to do the same with mutt ?
Laurent Mirguet
I use mutt. I love it. It's easily the best-of-breed as far as
mailers go, gui or not.
I do most of my work in terminal windows, or at the console, so I tend
to use a text-based browser quite a bit (in addition to the fact that
it's REALLY fast to browse with no graphical overhead).
I'd used
Joss Winn [mutt-users] <21/05/01 22:27 +0900>:
> I would like to disable the sendmail daemon yet still be able to
> fetch mail using fetchmail, calling sendmail to deliver the mail
> only when fetchmail needs it. Currently, if the sendmail daemon is
> disabled, I can send mail, but when trying
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Joss Winn wrote:
> I would like to disable the sendmail daemon yet still be able to
> fetch mail using fetchmail, calling sendmail to deliver the mail
> only when fetchmail needs it. Currently, if the sendmail daemon is
> disabled, I can send mail, but when trying to fetch i
Hello,
I would like to disable the sendmail daemon yet still be able to
fetch mail using fetchmail, calling sendmail to deliver the mail
only when fetchmail needs it. Currently, if the sendmail daemon is
disabled, I can send mail, but when trying to fetch i with
fetchmail, it fails because sendm
Larry Hignight ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this effect on 05/18/2001:
> I'm not sure how I missed this in the Mutt manual and some online tutorials,
> but I have some people on another mail list complaining that my email isn't
> wrapping properly. I am using vim as my editor. Which nee
Hey all. You've all been great with recent learning curve issues
while I learn about mutt, so thanks.
In a previous response, someone mentioned nntp patches for mutt, and a
pointer to the link page. I looked, and there are actually 4 patches.
I haven't had a chance to look at them all in detail
18 matches
Mail list logo
