Re: starting fetchmail from mutt

Am Mon, 23 Jul 2001, schrieb Victor: Now, I use fetchmail to fetch my mail then start mutt. I'd like instead to use the command 'G' to start fetchmail from within mutt but pressing G it tells me that I should define a POP. The problem is that I have 6 POPs defined in .fetchmailrc. Mutt can

Re: starting fetchmail from mutt

Christoph Maurer [mutt-users] 23/07/01 12:52 +0200: Am Mon, 23 Jul 2001, schrieb Victor: Now, I use fetchmail to fetch my mail then start mutt. I'd like instead to use the command 'G' to start fetchmail from within mutt but pressing G it tells me that I should define a POP. The problem

Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated

* Andy Spiegl [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010719 15:08]: Noone objected - does that mean that the code will be removed in the next release? If no, what do I have to do so that it will be removed? I'll throw in my objection then. You're proposing something like this?? Yes. I think mutt

exim/sendmail/postfix quitting with SIGSEGV

hi...i've been having real problems sending mail. (settled with masqmail for now). the thing is that all MTA's (i.e. exim/sendmail/postfix) i've tried exit with SIGSEGV (sig 11) when i try to send off the mail (through a queue run)...anyone else experienced this problem? everything was fine with

Re: exim/sendmail/postfix quitting with SIGSEGV

On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 02:46:22PM +0200, Nikolai 'pcp' Weibull wrote: hi...i've been having real problems sending mail. (settled with masqmail for now). the thing is that all MTA's (i.e. exim/sendmail/postfix) i've tried exit with SIGSEGV (sig 11) when i try to send off the mail (through a

Undefined PLT symbol mbrtowc

All, I have installed mutt on an older Pentium 100. When I try to execute it, I get the error: i mutt: Undefined PLT symbol mbrtowc (reloc type = 7, symnum = 166) I have attached my dmesg and the output of mutt -v. Does anyone know what this is and how I can fix it? --N. -- Nate Johnston

Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated

Hi Matt, My reasoning is close to Luke's: to support legacy mail notification programs. I thought about that, too. I think the change whouldn't affect bash if mutt only keeps the timestamp of the incoming mailbox /var/mail/..., right? However, I see your point. I wasn't really thinking

deleting group of messages

Hello, Is there a way to delete a group of messages from the message index in a way like: delete all messages from the currently selected message to #49 inclusive Thanks, Viraj.

[Announce] lbdb 0.25

I just released a new version of the little brother's database with the following changes: * Suggest mutt-ja as an alternative to mutt, because mutt-ja currently does not provide mutt (Closes: #85923). * Add m_ldap and mutt_ldap_query provided by Marc de Courville, [EMAIL PROTECTED].

Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated

Mutt's current behavior is consistent with elm and other mailers. This is traditional mbox behavior. I happen to like it. Great! Developers, will you change it then? :-) I hope not. There is no need to have the mtime to be updated every time the ctime is updated. (Or, if there is such a

key binding question

Howdy Guys, I would like to bind say, shift + g to use my own script (which fetches and sorts my mail...) How might I go about this? Thanks. -- Eat more spinach. -tom