Re: GPG-PGP

2001-12-31 Thread Benjamin Michotte
hello, just to say that I finally win :) I convert 3 friends to use mutt and they're really happy now ;) On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:18:50PM, Benjamin Michotte wrote: [clip] Is it possible to ask mutt sending signed messages in line or must I force my friends to use mutt ? (I try but is

Re: GPG-PGP

2001-12-31 Thread Philip Mak
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Benjamin Michotte wrote: just to say that I finally win :) I convert 3 friends to use mutt and they're really happy now ;) On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:18:50PM, Benjamin Michotte wrote: Is it possible to ask mutt sending signed messages in line or must I force my

Re: GPG-PGP

2001-12-31 Thread David T-G
Philip, et al -- ...and then Philip Mak said... % % On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Benjamin Michotte wrote: % % just to say that I finally win :) % I convert 3 friends to use mutt and they're really happy now ;) Yay! Good job :-) ... % I used mutt a few months ago but gave up on it because I

Please help verify my procmail settings to go with mutt

2001-12-31 Thread Charles Jie
Hi, I'm trying to substitute Mutt with Mozilla. One important porting work is dealing with the multiple accounts I keep, especially the mailing list. * But I found the flow of incoming mail dropping down. vim mailing list sent me a message telling me my mail is bouncing. On 12/28 and 29, I

Attachment umask

2001-12-31 Thread Markus Boelter
msg.pgp Description: PGP message

Re: mutt document in korean

2001-12-31 Thread Im Eunjea
* Michael Elkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-12-07 10:37]: On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 09:33:07PM +0300, Im Eunjea wrote: I wrote some page about Mutt in korean language. http://kltp.kldp.org/eunjea/mutt.php And I'm doing translation mutt manual(from source tarball) also.

Re: Please help verify my procmail settings to go with mutt

2001-12-31 Thread David T-G
Charles -- ...and then Charles Jie said... % % Hi, % % I'm trying to substitute Mutt with Mozilla. % % One important porting work is dealing with the multiple accounts I keep, % especially the mailing list. Piece of cake with mutt. % % * But I found the flow of incoming mail dropping

Re: Attachment umask

2001-12-31 Thread David T-G
Markus -- ...and then Markus Boelter said... % % Hello! % % Is it possible to set the Save-Attachment-Umask to % 022? Is it also possible to define a path in the configuration? Not AFAIK. I whipped up a little script to set the umask, change to a directory, and then pump the message through

Re: Attachment umask

2001-12-31 Thread David T-G
Markus -- ...and then Markus Boelter said... % % Hi! Hello! % % On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 07:22:47AM -0500, David T-G wrote: % % [...] % I named the script wmunpack and, except for receiving attachments in an % encrypted email (in which I decrypt-save to the mailbox and run wmunpack %

Re: Timestamps feature

2001-12-31 Thread Felipe Contreras
The reason mutt does this is that a number of new mail notifier programs (such as xbiff and pals) use the modification time to detect the arrival of new mail. If mutt did modify the mtime, then everytime you (for example) deleted an email, you would be notified of having new mail, which I'm

$display_filter perl script

2001-12-31 Thread Prahlad Vaidyanathan
Hi, [ Note: I am no longer subscribed to this list, so please Cc me on any followups ] I've attached a script to be used as a $display_filter. It is an extension of the quotefix ruby script Thomas Hurst posted sometime back. It is my first attempt at perl, so it _will_ get better over time.

Binary version for MUTT

2001-12-31 Thread Srivastava, Mohit
Title: Binary version for MUTT Dear all I Checked out the set of source code for MUTT and was trying to install and build following the procedure. However we have a C++ compiler and it gives errors in codes. Even after converting C code to C++ it fails later as key words New , delete etc are

Re: Binary version for MUTT

2001-12-31 Thread David T-G
Mohit -- ...and then Srivastava, Mohit said... % % Dear all % I Checked out the set of source code for MUTT and was trying to install and % build following the procedure. % However we have a C++ compiler and it gives errors in codes. Even after % converting C code to C++ it fails later as key

Re: Binary version for MUTT

2001-12-31 Thread David T-G
Mohit -- ...and then Srivastava, Mohit said... % % we have Solaris 5.7 % we tried installing GNU C compiler buw were having problems. How interesting. It's usually fairly straightforward; sunfreeware.com even has a precompiled package version. % It would be great if u can add for for

Re: Binary version for MUTT

2001-12-31 Thread David T-G
Mohit, et al -- ...and then David T-G said... % % ...and then Srivastava, Mohit said... % % % % we have Solaris 5.7 % % we tried installing GNU C compiler buw were having problems. % % How interesting. It's usually fairly straightforward; sunfreeware.com % even has a precompiled package

Re: Timestamps feature

2001-12-31 Thread David T-G
Felipe -- ...and then Felipe Contreras said... % % The reason mutt does this is that a number of new mail notifier programs % (such as xbiff and pals) use the modification time to detect the arrival % of new mail. If mutt did modify the mtime, then everytime you (for % example) deleted an

Re: Binary version for MUTT

2001-12-31 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach »Srivastava, Mohit« am 2001-12-31 um 14:27:52 - : I could find one for Linux which does not run on UNIX. Which UNIX? * This message is confidential and for use by the addressee only. If you are not

RE: Binary version for MUTT

2001-12-31 Thread Srivastava, Mohit
Title: RE: Binary version for MUTT we have Solaris 5.7 we tried installing GNU C compiler buw were having problems. It would be great if u can add for for Solaris . Thanks and regards Mohit -Original Message- From: David T-G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31,

Re: GPG-PGP

2001-12-31 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
Just picking a random point here... On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 05:04:22AM -0500 I heard the voice of Philip Mak, and lo! it spake thus: I think that mutt is a good e-mail client, but the default configuration is sub-optimal (vim doesn't format paragraphs well by default, some of the Well, vim

Re: Please help verify my procmail settings to go with mutt

2001-12-31 Thread Will Yardley
Charles Jie wrote: (My MTA is postfix (on Mandrake 8.1). Mutt is 1.3.24i. procmail 3.21.) I wonder whether the following files (copied from 'man procmail') have anything wrong. Help, please. * My ~/.forward: |IFS=' 'p=/usr/bin/procmailtest -f $pexec $p -Yf-||exit 75 #jie with postfix,

Re: Binary version for MUTT

2001-12-31 Thread Will Yardley
Srivastava, Mohit wrote: we have Solaris 5.7 we tried installing GNU C compiler buw were having problems. It would be great if u can add for for Solaris . a few things... 1) you're probably going to need to install packages other than gcc. if you're using gcc, you should probably use the

Re: Please help verify my procmail settings to go with mutt

2001-12-31 Thread René Clerc
* Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [31-12-2001 17:15]: | Charles Jie wrote: | | (My MTA is postfix (on Mandrake 8.1). Mutt is 1.3.24i. procmail 3.21.) | I wonder whether the following files (copied from 'man procmail') have | anything wrong. Help, please. | | * My ~/.forward: | | |IFS='

Thanks and a further question

2001-12-31 Thread Charles Jie
Thank you very much, David. I like Mutt's configurability and think it's the best MUA of programmers, isn't it? I don't think the missing of mail is Mutt's fault, either. What I suspect is procmail, which I found hard to understand it in short term. I place my question in mutt-users@ (sorry :-)

Re: Good vim configuration?

2001-12-31 Thread Gregor Zattler
Hi Thomas, * Thomas Hurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Die 25 Dez 2001 12:14:19 GMT]: [ ... reformating paragraphs in replys ... ] I use par(1), http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~amc/Par/ How (with which parameters) do you use it? I saw it a few months ago but got confused with parameters... Ciao, Gregor

Re: Thanks and a further question

2001-12-31 Thread Michael Tatge
Charles Jie muttered: Q: Is it possible to query Mutt server for a listing of posting for one day so that I can collate it with those mail I got? How? Check the mutt homepage. There are some archives listed there. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mutt-users/ HTH, Michael -- PGP-Key:

Re: Please help verify my procmail settings to go with mutt

2001-12-31 Thread Will Yardley
René Clerc wrote: * Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [31-12-2001 17:15]: with postfix, just: | /usr/bin/procmail -t should be fine. the fancy sendmail style trickery shouldn't be necessary. But, make sure in your postfix/main.cf the following line is present:

Where to put 'procmail'?

2001-12-31 Thread Charles Jie
Thank you both for hints about procmail, Will and Ren. Your suggestions make me curious about the issue of procmail that I postpone putting back my .forward. 1. In main.cf, I found a line: mailbox_command = /usr/bin/procmail -Y -a $DOMAIN 2. In /var/log/syslog, I also found this command

Re: Where to put 'procmail'?

2001-12-31 Thread Will Yardley
Charles Jie wrote: Your suggestions make me curious about the issue of procmail that I postpone putting back my .forward. 1. In main.cf, I found a line: mailbox_command = /usr/bin/procmail -Y -a $DOMAIN [...] Q1. I know the 'procmail' in .forward precedes that in main.cf. But can

Re: Good vim configuration?

2001-12-31 Thread Thomas Hurst
* Gregor Zattler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: * Thomas Hurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Die 25 Dez 2001 12:14:19 GMT]: [ ... reformating paragraphs in replys ... ] I use par(1), http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~amc/Par/ How (with which parameters) do you use it? I saw it a few months ago but got

List-Reply problems

2001-12-31 Thread Nick Wilson
Hi I'm having trouble replying to this list. If I enter ,L for a 'list-reply' I get the @gbnet address come up as the To field. I now have 'subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]' in my .muttrc but cannot seem to make it work. What might be causing this? Much thanks Nick

Re: Please help verify my procmail settings to go with mutt

2001-12-31 Thread Mark Johnson
If you have postfix, procmail, getmail (or whatever) logging at a reasonable level of verbosity, you will see the disposition of all messages, bounces and so forth, in your logs, eg, /var/log/mail.log, ~/Procmail/log, ~/.getmail/getmail.log. On 12/31/01, I received this from [EMAIL

Re: Good vim configuration?

2001-12-31 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
Alas! Thomas Hurst spake thus: How (with which parameters) do you use it? I saw it a few months ago but got confused with parameters... I stole PARINIT=grTbiqR B=.?_A_a Q=_s:| from someone and call it with If I'm not mistaken, that looks _exactly_ like what the man page tells you to use

Re: Please help verify my procmail settings to go with mutt

2001-12-31 Thread John P Verel
While I'm on RedHat, not Mandrake, my suspicion is that Mandrake may be set up so that you do not need a .forward file for postfix. Have you tried running without the .forward? John On 12/31/01, 07:05:28PM +0800, Charles Jie wrote: Hi, I'm trying to substitute Mutt with Mozilla. One

A happy new year!

2001-12-31 Thread Thomas Roessler
Folks, a happy new year and the best wishes to all of you. Without you, mutt wouldn't be the program it is. . .. . . ° . °. .° \~/ V |

Re: Please help verify my procmail settings to go with mutt

2001-12-31 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
Alas! John P Verel spake thus: While I'm on RedHat, not Mandrake, my suspicion is that Mandrake may be set up so that you do not need a .forward file for postfix. Have you tried running without the .forward? Well, I've used Mandrake in the past (and Debian in the present), and to my

Re: A happy new year!

2001-12-31 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
Alas! Thomas Roessler spake thus: Folks, a happy new year and the best wishes to all of you. Without you, mutt wouldn't be the program it is. To you as well! Funny how I get to spend New Years Eve trying to make a heterogenous network of Linux and Windows boxen work with each other, and

Re: Good vim configuration?

2001-12-31 Thread Thomas Hurst
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Alas! Thomas Hurst spake thus: I stole PARINIT=grTbiqR B=.?_A_a Q=_s:| from someone and call it with If I'm not mistaken, that looks _exactly_ like what the man page tells you to use if you want to use par now, but understand it later. Then

Re: A happy new year!

2001-12-31 Thread David T-G
Rob -- ...and then Feztaa said... % % Funny how I get to spend New Years Eve trying to make a heterogenous % network of Linux and Windows boxen work with each other, and the rest of % you get to party (hopefully) :) Oh, quit your whining -- you know you're in hog heaven :-) Happy Holidays to

Re: A happy new year!

2001-12-31 Thread Ken Weingold
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001, Thomas Roessler wrote: a happy new year and the best wishes to all of you. Without you, mutt wouldn't be the program it is. And thanks to you, Thomas, for keeping all of us sane, though email anyway -Ken

Re: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter

2001-12-31 Thread Andre Majorel
On 2001-12-28 11:19 -0500, Dan Boger wrote: On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 05:09:05PM +0100, Andre Majorel wrote: There is one guy out there who has particular and very annoying writing idiosyncracies (think Prince or B1FF). I wrote a filter to translate his prose to something less obnoxious. Now

Re: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter

2001-12-31 Thread Andre Majorel
On 2001-12-28 18:22 +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: I thought that message-hook ~f joe@blow\.com pipe-message /usr/local/bin/unmangle would do the trick but Mutt says pipe-message: unknown command. It's pipe-message (incl. the angle brackets) isn't it? I've tried that too and

Re: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter

2001-12-31 Thread Andre Majorel
On 2001-12-28 17:15 +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 05:09:05PM +0100, Andre Majorel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought that message-hook ~f joe@blow\.com pipe-message /usr/local/bin/unmangle would do the trick but Mutt says pipe-message: unknown command.

Getting pgp to work

2001-12-31 Thread Ian P. Thomas
Here is the error message that appears after I try and sign my mail with my gpg key: Can't open PGP subprocess!: No such file or directory (errno = 2) I figured that it couldn't find the ~/.gnupg directory, but it's there. I have set pgp_sign_as=my key id in my muttrc.

Re: Good vim configuration?

2001-12-31 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
Alas! Thomas Hurst spake thus: I stole PARINIT=grTbiqR B=.?_A_a Q=_s:| from someone and call it with If I'm not mistaken, that looks _exactly_ like what the man page tells you to use if you want to use par now, but understand it later. Then again, maybe it just looks vaguely similar