or from my site at
http://mutt.justpickone.org/
in the build cocktail directory as patch-1.3.15.sw.pgp-outlook.1 (yes,
the .15 version applies cleanly to the .25 source).
%
% And is there a way to name the sig attachment? It's confusing some
% people and I'd rather they didn't
* Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] [08-01-2002 03:36]:
| On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 21:04:10 -0500, mike ledoux wrote:
| On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 12:27:29AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
| Me too. Now, this isn't a problem for me as using the editor (emacs
| in my case) to do that is a better
* Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [08-01-2002 09:20]:
| % And is there a way to name the sig attachment? It's confusing some
| % people and I'd rather they didn't think I was sending them stuff they
| % _had_ to open.
|
| If you use both $p_c_t and $p_o_c then LookOut! will be able to handle
| % And is there a way to name the sig attachment? It's confusing some
| % people and I'd rather they didn't think I was sending them stuff they
| % _had_ to open.
|
| If you use both $p_c_t and $p_o_c then LookOut! will be able to handle
| it even though it's named something like
* Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [08-01-2002 09:51]:
| Thanks Rene, er where do I find the mutt tree?
| When I compiled it I just did it in my home dir, if that's what you mean
| then is it possible to move the mutt tree to a more appropriate place?
Mine is in /usr/src/mutt-1.3.25, but I
* René Clerc [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020108 09:47]:
* Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [08-01-2002 09:20]:
| % And is there a way to name the sig attachment? It's confusing some
| % people and I'd rather they didn't think I was sending them stuff they
| % _had_ to open.
|
| If you use both
* Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [08-01-2002 10:41]:
| It doesn't look like I have 'patch' in my system, would there be a
| similar command?
You could add and remove lines by hand ;)
No, you really have to install patch. If you have any further
questions, lease send them in private, because
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 06:57:13AM +0100, Gerhard Häring wrote:
Le 07/01/02 ? 22:57, Walt Mankowski écrivit:
I recently tried out mutt 1.3.25. This is my first look at the 1.3.*
series of mutt. One thing I noticed right away is that mutt is no
longer display accented characters
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 21:44:05 -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
There is no built-in way to hide the [-- ... --] stuff, but I got
tired of looking at it, especially surrounding the frequent HTML
messages I receive and around people's PGP signatures, so I added this
to my folder-hooks for mailing
Ok, so then how to I get vim into my profile.
I use vim all the time from w3m, and on it's own from the
command line, even, so I'm not sure why it isn't working
for mutt.
--- Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Knute [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020108 08:39]:
Ok, I've been fighting this for
Yes, it is a sendmail issue. I ran that very same command several timesover
the period of a couple of reboots to ensure that I had configured it correctly
to start at boot. Got it working now so thanks.
---rhad
On 07-Jan-02 Derek D. Martin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash:
* Knute [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020108 12:50]:
Ok, so then how to I get vim into my profile.
I use vim all the time from w3m, and on it's own from the
command line, even, so I'm not sure why it isn't working
for mutt.
--- Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Knute [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[07.01.02 10:21 -0500] David T-G -- :
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% I'll stick with using *bold* like this. It works for me :)
I certainly agree :-)
I like to add a related question about conventions:
is the * the same convention for *bold* as the _ is
is for _underline_ ?
vote
* Erika Pacholleck [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020108 13:09]:
[07.01.02 10:21 -0500] David T-G -- :
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% I'll stick with using *bold* like this. It works for me :)
I certainly agree :-)
I like to add a related question about conventions:
is the * the same
Somebody said:
On this line, has anyone seen a calendaring piece that will allow you to
respond to appointment requests from m$ exchange? From what I
understand, Evolution has an Exchange connector piece that you can
purchase, but I really want nothing to do with Evolution if I can help
it
With that and staroffice I could really make some PHB start thinking
again about which platform has the lower TCO, is safer, better support,
etc
Of course, until the boss' secretary keeps collapsing the LAN by sending
everybody in the company staff meeting at 10:am messages as
Hi everyone,
Is there a way of giving the gpg signiture a default name like
'nicks_electronic_signiture' or something equally as clear?
On some clients it's coming up labled the same as the subject and on
others, some weird default like 'attach0023'
Most confusing.
Thanks
--
Nick Wilson
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 08:01:47AM -0500, Walt Mankowski wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 01:57:47PM +0100, Nick Wilson wrote:
Is there a way of giving the gpg signiture a default name like
'nicks_electronic_signiture' or something equally as clear?
On some clients it's coming up labled
* Walt Mankowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020108 14:12]:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 01:57:47PM +0100, Nick Wilson wrote:
Is there a way of giving the gpg signiture a default name like
'nicks_electronic_signiture' or something equally as clear?
On some clients it's coming up labled the same as
* Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [08-01-2002 13:01]:
| * Knute [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020108 12:50]:
| Ok, so then how to I get vim into my profile.
|
| I use vim all the time from w3m, and on it's own from the
| command line, even, so I'm not sure why it isn't working
| for mutt.
Nick:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 08:50:16PM +0100, Michael Wagner wrote:
On Sonntag, 06. Jan. 2002 at 20:53:24, MuttER wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 08:30:05PM +0530, Prahlad Vaidyanathan wrote:
mailcap
text/html; w3m -T text/html %s
/mailcap
You could also add a 'copiousoutput' at
I am using mutt 1.3.25i as my IMAP mail client. The problem I am now
having is to attach a file to outgoing mail. When I select the attach
file option followed by show files, I get a list of imap folders on
my server, instead of local files. How do I resolve this?
IMAP Specific settings:
set
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 11:42:26AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 21:44:05 -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
There is no built-in way to hide the [-- ... --] stuff, but I got
tired of looking at it, especially surrounding the frequent HTML
messages I receive and around
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 11:42:26AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 21:44:05 -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
There is no built-in way to hide the [-- ... --] stuff, but I got
tired of looking at it, especially surrounding the frequent HTML
messages I receive and around
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Ben Reser hath spake thusly:
If so, then if you had my key, and I knew you had someone else's key,
and I knew that you depended only on checking the s or S, I could
easily forge mail as the other person, and you'd think
René Clerc [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you set editor to , mutt will use the environment variable
EDITOR; make sure this is set (and exported) in your .profile or an
alike file.
Wouldn't Mutt actually ignore $EDITOR if $VISUAL is set?
Nick, it's probably a good idea to set VISUAL=vim,
* mike ledoux ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 09:22:45AM +0100, René Clerc wrote:
I couldn't _disagree_ with you more. For example, C source code is
text to: I bet you'll want your editor to know that it's editing C
source code ;)
I'd perhaps disagree that it should
Wouldn't Mutt actually ignore $EDITOR if $VISUAL is set?
Nick, it's probably a good idea to set VISUAL=vim, anyway, since
many other applications will then know what editor you prefer.
Sounds fine to me Sam, I don't know what VISUAL is though?
I presume it's a config var, I'll go look it
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 07:08:00 -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
As I said, for other mailboxes I use a script that is more selective:
sed '
/^\[-- Autoview using .* --]$/d
/^\[-- Attachment .* --]$/d
/^\[-- Type: .* --]$/d
'
But this will also
* Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [08-01-2002 16:51]:
|
| Wouldn't Mutt actually ignore $EDITOR if $VISUAL is set?
|
| Nick, it's probably a good idea to set VISUAL=vim, anyway, since
| many other applications will then know what editor you prefer.
|
| Sounds fine to me Sam, I don't know
On Jan 8, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
It seems to me send-hook ~t is not working with autoedit and
edit_headers set.
This is a bug, isn't it?
Why should it be considered a bug? Autoedit per definition skips
the send-menu, and as the recipient is still unknown when you enter
the editor, send-hooks
Thus spake Derek D. Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
- pgp userid identification
Despite the fact that I've composed an e-mail to a person whose
e-mail address matches exactly one of the userid's in my gpg key
ring, and despite the fact that gpg will select the correct key
every time
Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sounds fine to me Sam, I don't know what VISUAL is though?
I presume it's a config var, I'll go look it up on the manual.
Sorry, I think I was unclear: VISUAL is an environment variable.
It isn't Mutt-specific. You might want to look at the
documentation
Hi all
When I pick up mails using Outlook I get 2 attachments. One containing
my email message and the other the pgp signiture.
I was told that the pgp-outlook patch would correct this but I'm not
having any luck.
What I'm looking for is someone that has maybe applied this patch to
give me a
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 04:50:42PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 07:08:00 -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
As I said, for other mailboxes I use a script that is more selective:
sed '
/^\[-- Autoview using .* --]$/d
/^\[-- Attachment .*
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 06:03:19PM +0200, Holger Lillqvist wrote:
On Jan 8, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
It seems to me send-hook ~t is not working with autoedit and
edit_headers set.
This is a bug, isn't it?
Why should it be considered a bug? Autoedit per definition skips
the send-menu,
Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry, I think I was unclear: VISUAL is an environment variable.
It isn't Mutt-specific. You might want to look at the
documentation for your shell for more information.
If you use bash, putting
export VISUAL=vim
in your .bash_profile or
mike ledoux [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't buy into the idea that the editor should be the beginning and
the end of my interaction with the system. I expect a text editor to
be good at editing text--nothing more, nothing less. To insist that
the editor should know the difference between
There is some company who makes an Exchange client, for I think at
least Linux and Solaris. I forget who it is, but it's supposed to be
rather good.
-Ken
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, mike ledoux hath spake thusly:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 10:18:55AM -0500, Derek D. Martin wrote:
That's interesting. I didn't realize mutt would do that. Though in
THIS case, it SHOULD match, and should be considered
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Justin R. Miller hath spake thusly:
Thus spake Derek D. Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
- pgp userid identification
Despite the fact that I've composed an e-mail to a person whose
e-mail address matches exactly
Jeremy, et al --
...and then Jeremy Blosser said...
%
% On Jan 07, David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
% It appears that the recipient is now (1.3.25) provided as the default
% subject. At least, as far as I can tell it is, and I even went back
...
%
% FWIW I don't see this behaviour at
Thus spake Nick Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
When I pick up mails using Outlook I get 2 attachments. One containing
my email message and the other the pgp signiture.
I was told that the pgp-outlook patch would correct this but I'm not
having any luck.
What I'm looking for is someone
I want messages to disappear after I mark them deleted
or saved. Is there a way to do this in Mutt?
Thanks,
Todd
=
Todd Kokoszka
25, rue Richard Lenoir
75011 Paris
Tel. 01.43.72.77.08
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% Hi all
% When I pick up mails using Outlook I get 2 attachments. One containing
% my email message and the other the pgp signiture.
Right.
%
% I was told that the pgp-outlook patch would correct this but I'm not
% having any luck.
You have to
On Jan 8, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
Why not reevaluate the send-hooks after the editing session and after
changing the recipient in the compose menu?
For instance, send-hooks can be used to insert different signatures
matching certain addresses (inserting sigs in different languages,
etc.).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Ken Weingold hath spake thusly:
There is some company who makes an Exchange client, for I think at
least Linux and Solaris. I forget who it is, but it's supposed to be
rather good.
HP OpenMail
- --
Derek Martin
Dear Mutters,
I suspect that it doesn't have anything to do with mutt, but I don't know
who else to ask. The thing is that all of a sudden all mails from a friend
of mine (who also uses mutt) have TABs in these three header lines:
From:TABname etc
To:TABname etc
Date:TABdate
We have no idea
Todd Kokoszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] [08 Jan 2002 08:32 -0800]:
I want messages to disappear after I mark them deleted
or saved. Is there a way to do this in Mutt?
You could make a macro like this:
macro pager d delete-messagesync-mailbox
HTH (untested)
cheers
j
--
http://www.epic.org -
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 11:51:41 -0500, mike ledoux wrote:
AFAIK, it is a sendmail feature that most other MTAs have emulated.
But qmail uses '-' instead of '+'. Therefore, the reader mustn't assume
anything.
--
Vincent Lefèvre [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Web: http://www.vinc17.org/ - 100%
validated
On 2002.01.08, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds fine to me Sam, I don't know what VISUAL is though?
I presume it's a config var, I'll go look it up on the manual.
Is that why I sometimes see headers with X-editor: Vim?
How will other apps know what
Todd --
...and then Todd Kokoszka said...
%
% I want messages to disappear after I mark them deleted
% or saved. Is there a way to do this in Mutt?
Just synchronize your mailbox. With the default bindings, hit '$' and
anything with a 'D' by it will disappear.
%
% Thanks,
HTH HAND
%
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020108 18:18]:
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% Hi all
% When I pick up mails using Outlook I get 2 attachments. One containing
% my email message and the other the pgp signiture.
Right.
%
% I was told that the pgp-outlook patch would
* David Champion [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020108 18:42]:
On 2002.01.08, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds fine to me Sam, I don't know what VISUAL is though?
I presume it's a config var, I'll go look it up on the manual.
Is that why I sometimes see
On 8-Jan-2002 10:55 Justin R. Miller wrote:
|
| I don't know about you, but I'd like to have a final confirmation of
| whose key I'm encrypting with before I send a message. For my close
| friends, I have a send-hook set up (to encrypt) and that searches for
| their key(s), but never prompts
Thus spake Nick Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
As I'm sure you can see I'm really not that expert at
compiling/patching and generally fiddling around so if there is a
simple all-in-one idiots way to get all I need then let me have at it!
I'd appreciate your comments on the difference between
Quick question. I just upgraded mutt from 1.2.5i to Mutt 1.3.25i Because of
the security change. Problem is that my main inbox (my spoolfile I belive)
is now giving me Mailbox is read-only. when ever I try to do any
operations on it.
The important part of my .muttrc is here:
set
Hey Nick
Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [08 Jan 2002 18:34 +0100]:
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020108 18:18]:
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% Hi all
% When I pick up mails using Outlook I get 2 attachments. One containing
% my email message and the other the pgp
On 2002.01.08, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Todd Kokoszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want messages to disappear after I mark them deleted
or saved. Is there a way to do this in Mutt?
When the view limit is set to !~D, deleted message are present, but not
visible in the index view.
Thus spake Troy Heber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Quick question. I just upgraded mutt from 1.2.5i to Mutt 1.3.25i
Because of the security change. Problem is that my main inbox (my
spoolfile I belive) is now giving me Mailbox is read-only. when ever
I try to do any operations on it.
The
Mutt decodes messages with the following
charset to only a bunch of question marks:
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=ks_c_5601-1987
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Is this anything I should be able
to read with hangul fonts?
Sven [getting a lot of weird emails lately]
--
Jonathan Irving wrote:
It's still an application/pgp message.
i've proposed to the dev list that this be changed before the next full
release. it seems silly to cling to a standard that was withdrawn, and
that no other MUAs take advantage of / can read.
since pgp/mime is the 'standard', at
Troy --
...and then Troy Heber said...
%
% Quick question. I just upgraded mutt from 1.2.5i to Mutt 1.3.25i Because of
% the security change. Problem is that my main inbox (my spoolfile I belive)
% is now giving me Mailbox is read-only. when ever I try to do any
...
% set
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% * David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020108 18:18]:
%
% ...and then Nick Wilson said...
% %
% % I was told that the pgp-outlook patch would correct this but I'm not
% % having any luck.
%
% You have to both set $pgp_create_traditional (which is a
At this point I have to agree with this sentiment. After six years, we are
really no furthur to the point of OpenPGP/MIME acceptance. I've personally
taken to just using a macro in VIM to invoke gpg messages because I have
to deal with a large number of Outlook users. I endorse changing
Will, et al --
...and then Will Yardley said...
%
% Jonathan Irving wrote:
%
% It's still an application/pgp message.
%
% i've proposed to the dev list that this be changed before the next full
% release. it seems silly to cling to a standard that was withdrawn, and
% that no other MUAs
At 10:24 AM 1/8/2002 -0800, Will Yardley wrote and esj rearranged:
it's going to be difficult to gain more widespread adoption for the
OpenPGP standards on windows until someone makes an easy to use (and
install) version of GnuPG for 'doze, and until someone makes a plugin
for Outlook Express for
% As I'm sure you can see I'm really not that expert at compiling/patching
% and generally fiddling around so if there is a simple all-in-one idiots
% way to get all I need then let me have at it!
I'm workin' on it :-) You could also grab the -05 tar file from the
clean directory and
it's going to be difficult to gain more widespread adoption for the
OpenPGP standards on windows until someone makes an easy to use (and
install) version of GnuPG for 'doze, and until someone makes a plugin
for Outlook Express for it.
so... in the meantime, i think we need to make our
Thus spake Michael Elkins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I endorse changing pgp_create_traditional such that for text/plain
messages it doesn't alter the content-type.
So you're saying to make the Outlook patch standard? I wasn't aware
that application/pgp-whatever was withdrawn. If that's the case,
* Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] [08-01-2002 18:36]:
| On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 11:51:41 -0500, mike ledoux wrote:
| AFAIK, it is a sendmail feature that most other MTAs have emulated.
|
| But qmail uses '-' instead of '+'. Therefore, the reader mustn't assume
| anything.
In postfix, it
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% % As I'm sure you can see I'm really not that expert at compiling/patching
% % and generally fiddling around so if there is a simple all-in-one idiots
% % way to get all I need then let me have at it!
%
% I'm workin' on it :-) You could also
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-01-08 19:22]:
Mutt decodes messages with the following
charset to only a bunch of question marks:
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=ks_c_5601-1987
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Is this anything I should be able
to read with hangul
* Samuel Padgett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [08-01-2002 17:39]:
[all context]
| Real UNIX users only compose email with ed, no doubt about it! ;-)
Real UNIX users telnet to the SMTP port ;)
--
René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
The very essence of leadership is that you have to
René Clerc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| But qmail uses '-' instead of '+'. Therefore, the reader mustn't assume
| anything.
It's configurable in qmail, either system-wide (conf-break) or on a
per-address/user basis (qmail-users). It can be '+' or '-' or '|' or 'F' if
you like.
Charles
--
Hello all,
I did a quick check for maildir in the manual as well as a quick archive
search but couldn't hit what I wanted. I just switched a couple of my
boxes to maildir to deal with NFS not setting mtime and atime properly.
Only trouble so far is that with two new messages I have recieved in
This would not affect the PGP/MIME support at all. It will continue to
function as it always has. I just don't think there is any value in
continuing to label application/pgp messages: you should either use PGP/MIME
or just clearsign the message without changing the content-type.
me
Use procmail to insert a Line: header field if you want that. With maildir,
you don't need to read the entire message, just the header, so if that
information is not available there, you don't get it. Mutt won't read the
body of the message to determine how many lines there are because its very
Le 08/01/02 à 16:06, Frank Sonnemans écrivit:
I am using mutt 1.3.25i as my IMAP mail client. The problem I am now
having is to attach a file to outgoing mail. When I select the attach
file option followed by show files, I get a list of imap folders on
my server, instead of local files. How
* David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I did a quick check for maildir in the manual as well as a quick archive
search but couldn't hit what I wanted. I just switched a couple of my
boxes to maildir to deal with NFS not setting mtime and atime properly.
Only trouble so far is that
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 12:39:27PM -0800, Curt Zirzow wrote:
There is the %c that can be used wich will show the number of bytes of
the message.
Ah, I like that better anyway. I didn't even think about switching it.
Sometimes the easiest way is just to go around. :)
Not a problem with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
% I'm workin' on it :-) You could also grab the -05 tar file from the
% clean directory and un-tar and then configure and make, but you'd get
% all of the rest of my patches, too ;-)
Well, unless you're going to tell me this message is badly
On Jan 08, Charles Cazabon [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Ren? Clerc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| But qmail uses '-' instead of '+'. Therefore, the reader mustn't assume
| anything.
It's configurable in qmail, either system-wide (conf-break) or on a
per-address/user basis (qmail-users).
Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
Alas! Benjamin Smith spake thus:
The ways that script works is by outputting the muttrc to a tempory
file, the name of which is outputted for source, but what you can do is
just to put:
`~/bin/do-whatever.sh`
In the muttrc and mutt will interpret the
Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [08 Jan 2002 21:35 +0100]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[body of message here]
[sig here]
It's supposed to just be signed. Is there a need for that top bit?
The digital signature is, I believe, a SHA1 hash of the message
content,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The digital signature is, I believe, a SHA1 hash of the message
content, encrypted using your private key. The hash is a
checksum; the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
is important to recompute the checksum for verification.
That's my
Michael, et al --
...and then Michael Elkins said...
%
% This would not affect the PGP/MIME support at all. It will continue to
Oh, no; of course not.
% function as it always has. I just don't think there is any value in
% continuing to label application/pgp messages: you should either use
Hi,
I have no much knowledge about sendmail, mutt, etc. but I have a similar
network as yours. Perhaps my experience helps.
1. Suppose you have a sendmail or postfix MTA running in your linux box.
Send mail by yourself. This avoids rejection by the mail server of
your ISP.
2. I run my
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 12:39:27PM -0800, Curt Zirzow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Not a problem with procmail but can be solved with it by using:
|
| :0 Bfhw
| * H ?? ! ^Lines:
| * -1^0
| * 1^1 ^.*$
| | formail -A Lines: $=
|
| Then you will have the number of lines shown.
Can you decode that
Derek, et al --
...and then Derek D. Martin said...
%
% At some point hitherto, Justin R. Miller hath spake thusly:
% Thus spake Derek D. Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
%
%The s in the index is sufficient for me if I want to know if a
%message is signed.
%
% Perhaps, but it's not
Jeremy, et al --
...and then Jeremy Blosser said...
%
% On Jan 08, Vincent Lefevre [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
% On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 10:16:58 -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
% Why not just 'unset pgp_verify_sig'? That's what I do.
%
% But is there an option to ask Mutt not to display
Volker -
...and then Volker Moell said...
%
% Lars Hecking wrote:
%
% Secondly, mutt also supports checking of traditionally signed email
% (i.e. without conversion).
%
% EscP check-traditional-pgp check for classic pgp
%
...
% single mail I can hit Esc-P, but when searching in
Derek, et al --
...and then Derek D. Martin said...
%
% There seems to be no way to make mutt include a forwarded message in
% quoted text. MUCH more often than not, that's the behavior I want, so
...
% The easiest way to do this is, of course, to just use reply. ;-)
%
% Well, yes, except
I asked this in another message, but it looks like it got lost... can
someone please confirm or deny that they see this behaviour as well under
1.3.25?
1. use the new check-traditional-pgp command from the index on a message
that has an old-style pgp signature
2. note that the 's' flag
On Jan 08, David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
...and then Derek D. Martin said...
% [SNIP more of my ramblings...]
%
% Try Esc-P when displaying a message.
%
% Ok... I was unfamiliar with this option/feature. I guess you could
% add another gripe: documentation. The old version is
Jeremy --
...and then Jeremy Blosser said...
%
% I asked this in another message, but it looks like it got lost... can
% someone please confirm or deny that they see this behaviour as well under
% 1.3.25?
I'm running 1.3.25, so ...
%
% 1. use the new check-traditional-pgp command from the
* Cameron Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 12:39:27PM -0800, Curt Zirzow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Not a problem with procmail but can be solved with it by using:
|
| :0 Bfhw
| * H ?? ! ^Lines:
| * -1^0
| * 1^1 ^.*$
| | formail -A Lines: $=
|
| Then you will
[lun 07/01/2002, ore 12:56] = David Champion scrive:
[...]
Have you changed your value of $alternates? If the sender's name matches
$alternates, and your $index_format has %F in that slot, it will
expand to the recipient's name instead of to your name.
Yes, I see it.
Now I use %n and
* Justin R. Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 08. 2002 12:05]:
[ snipped query about pgp_outlook_compat ]
On a somewhat related note, for anyone who didn't know, Debian for a few
versions now has supported this patch already in the sid package.
When I was using 1.3.24 in woody it supported
Sorry if this is off-topic. I figured that a urlview question was best
asked here. I am getting no text in urlview for the matches it finds in
an email. Here is the output:
UrlView 0.9: (2 matches) Press Q or Ctrl-C to Quit!
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
