On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 11:27:53PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
set record=+sent-mail
The Mutt manual implies that + and = are simply two
equivalent ways of designating the default location of
mailboxes. No difference?
Tom
--
Dr. Thomas Baker[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Joel!
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Joel Hammer wrote:
This seems to work for me in my .muttrc file.
fcc-hook . ~/Mail/sent-mail
Joel
But unfortunaltly then mutt keeps me asking everytime if i want to save
the mail..
Even after setting:
set copy=ask-no
How can i prevent this ?
Previously, Thomas Baker wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 11:27:53PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
set record=+sent-mail
The Mutt manual implies that + and = are simply two
equivalent ways of designating the default location of
mailboxes. No difference?
No - the + notation exists so that
Previously, Nik Engel wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Joel Hammer wrote:
This seems to work for me in my .muttrc file.
fcc-hook . ~/Mail/sent-mail
Joel
But unfortunaltly then mutt keeps me asking everytime if i want to save
the mail..
Even after setting:
set copy=ask-no
How can i
Hey people.
I have a work account that I'd like to check now and then via imap, but
the server is not always accessible as I must use an IPsec client to create
the connection when I need it.
What's the best way to configure Mutt to make it easy to check my work
imap folders? I don't
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002 5:59 pm, mikea wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 05:02:49PM -0500, Eric Christopherson wrote:
On Thursday, April 18, 2002 6:19 pm, Eric Christopherson wrote:
Hi. I'm having a bad problem with mutt: it tends to hang whenever it
decides it says Sorting mailbox...
set record=+sent-mail
The Mutt manual implies that + and = are simply two
equivalent ways of designating the default location of
mailboxes. No difference?
No - the + notation exists so that you don't have to type things like:
set record==sent-mail
That's (obviously)
* Thomas Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-25 06:46]:
The Mutt manual implies that + and = are
simply two equivalent ways of designating the
default location of mailboxes. No difference?
spelling
On Zsh command line the '=' is a meta sign
so I prefer using mutt -f +folder.
Sven
* Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-25 02:06]:
I have a work account that I'd like to check now and then
via imap, but the server is not always accessible as I must
use an IPsec client to create the connection when I need it.
What's the best way to configure Mutt to make it easy
* Dave Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-23 08:20]:
Our wonderful corporate IT department has added a virus scanner to
the main MTA. .. this particular scanner communicates its result by
adding an extra text/plain attachment to the top of the mail. AIUI,
this violates the PGP/MIME RFC, and
* Rahul Rekapalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-22 19:59]:
I enabled PGP signing in mutt, when i view the mail, mutt shows the
PGP signature inline, but a couple of friends of mine who use Pine,
asked me why my PGP signature was attached rather than being inline.
Is there something that I have
Hi all.
How should i configure my muttrc to make mutt don't include my address
in group replies messages? The variable metoo is unset, but my address is
still there (CC).
TIA
--
Eduardo Gargiulo
^ejg(-.*)?@ar\.homelinux\.org$
msg27635/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 2002-04-25 Eduardo Gargiulo wrote:
How should i configure my muttrc to make mutt don't include my address
in group replies messages? The variable metoo is unset, but my address is
still there (CC).
Did you set alternates correctly, so that mutt knows, who you are?
Regards,
Christoph
Christoph Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2002-04-25 Eduardo Gargiulo wrote:
How should i configure my muttrc to make mutt don't include my address
in group replies messages? The variable metoo is unset, but my address is
still there (CC).
Did you set alternates correctly, so that
Eduardo --
...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
%
...
% set alternates=egargiulo@ingdesi.(net|com)?
% set alternates=ejg(-.*)?@ar.homelinux.org
Unlike mailboxes or lists, alternates is a basic regexp, so your second
setting will step on your first and no egargiulo addresses will be
recognized.
David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eduardo --
...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
%
...
% set alternates=egargiulo@ingdesi.(net|com)?
% set alternates=ejg(-.*)?@ar.homelinux.org
Unlike mailboxes or lists, alternates is a basic regexp, so your second
setting will step on your first
Hi all,
I just started using Mutt last week, and have really loved it.
I was using 1.2.5, but I wanted %E in index_format, so I grabbed 1.3.28i.
Now I have a new problem, which is that my mailbox is considered read-only. I
am just using my spoolfile over NFS. Everything was working great
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 13:38:56 -0600, Brett H. Williams wrote:
Now I have a new problem, which is that my mailbox is considered
read-only. I am just using my spoolfile over NFS. Everything was
working great before the upgrade.
I have the same problem when I want to install Mutt. This is
Eduardo --
...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
%
% David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
%
% ...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
% %
% ...
% % set alternates=egargiulo@ingdesi.(net|com)?
% % set alternates=ejg(-.*)?@ar.homelinux.org
...
%
%set
Brett --
...and then Brett H. Williams said...
%
% Hi all,
Hello!
%
% I just started using Mutt last week, and have really loved it.
Yay for you, and welcome!
%
% I was using 1.2.5, but I wanted %E in index_format, so I grabbed 1.3.28i.
Good idea, especially since 1.2.5 has a
Vincent, et al --
...and then Vincent Lefevre said...
%
% On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 13:38:56 -0600, Brett H. Williams wrote:
% Now I have a new problem, which is that my mailbox is considered
% read-only. I am just using my spoolfile over NFS. Everything was
% working great before the upgrade.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 10:59:29 -0500, David T-G wrote:
% This is quite annoying. A configure option to prevent it from being
% installed would be a good idea IMHO.
While I agree that it isn't a bad idea, I don't know that it's a terribly
good idea; you can already tell mutt to not use
Hi!
On Don, Apr 25, 2002 at 06:13:54 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote
I think you haven't understood. There is already a mutt_dotlock
installed here (in /usr/...) with correct permissions. But I also
want to install more recent versions of Mutt in my home directory,
and make install installs a
On Apr 25, David T-G wrote:
[snip]
What does
ls -dl `which mutt` `which mutt_dotlock` `dirname $MAIL`
give you? If mutt_dotlock is owned by you instead of root, that's
probably your problem. Fortunately it's easily fixed by getting rid of
the mutt_dotlock you just installed; the
Vincent --
...and then Vincent Lefevre said...
%
% On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 10:59:29 -0500, David T-G wrote:
% % This is quite annoying. A configure option to prevent it from being
% % installed would be a good idea IMHO.
%
% While I agree that it isn't a bad idea, I don't know that it's a
Hi,
I have here one linuxbox (RedHat 7.0 updated to current state of
updates.redhat.com) connected through to Internet through dial-up
and one (my wife's) notebook with M$-Windows (and Netscape
Messenger for reading emails) connected through the same dial-up
line (takes a lot of non-electronic
Matej Cepl wrote:
[somewhat OT for this list, but...]
* use patch for imapd for reading maildir boxen. I tried that
(using patch for Pine 4.4* from
http://hico.fphil.uniba.sk/pine-patches.html) but when I tried
to connect to locally created maildir file, I have got just
browsing
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 10:41:33AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
Matej Cepl wrote:
[somewhat OT for this list, but...]
Sorry, for that, but do you any better list for isync?
why are you so tied into using UW imapd? it's pretty much universally
regarded as insecure and poorly written... you
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 12:14:01 -0500, David T-G wrote:
So which is easier, to remove a file or to tell configure to not put it
there in the first place?
The latter. :) I use a shell alias to configure mutt, because I need
several other options (which may depend on the architecture). So, all
Vincent --
...and then Vincent Lefevre said...
%
% On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 12:14:01 -0500, David T-G wrote:
% So which is easier, to remove a file or to tell configure to not put it
% there in the first place?
%
% The latter. :) I use a shell alias to configure mutt, because I need
Well,
* On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Im Eunjea wrote:
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-21 04:35]:
[...]
copy+paste from vim?
anyway - this can be wrong if 'T' means
something else than tag-pattern.. :-(
the following is a little longer - but should work
even when the keys are
* John Iverson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-25 13:40]:
[...]
I'm using this:
macro index \Cx \
tag-pattern~Nentertag-prefixtoggle-newtag-prefixclear-flag* \
Mark all boring new msgs
This malfunctions if there are no N(ew) messages by incorrectly
setting N on the highlighted
Hi,
* David T-G [04/25/02 19:14:01 CEST] wrote:
...and then Vincent Lefevre said...
% too. :( I have to remove mutt_dotlock from my bin directory each
% time I want to install a new version of Mutt.
So which is easier, to remove a file or to tell configure to not put it
there in the first
* On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Im Eunjea wrote:
* John Iverson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-25 13:40]:
[...]
I'm using this:
macro index \Cx \
tag-pattern~Nentertag-prefixtoggle-newtag-prefixclear-flag* \
Mark all boring new msgs
This malfunctions if there are no N(ew)
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 23:12:58 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
It doesn't really matter, I think. The dotlock program is the
last which is to be installed. if chgrp fails, who cares since
(at that point) everything else is sucessfully where it should
be. Just remove the binary.
But some users
* John Iverson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-25 14:19]:
* On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Im Eunjea wrote:
* John Iverson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-25 13:40]:
[...]
I'm using this:
macro index \Cx \
tag-pattern~Nentertag-prefixtoggle-newtag-prefixclear-flag* \
Mark all
Hi,
* Vincent Lefevre [04/25/02 23:27:08 CEST] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 23:12:58 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
It doesn't really matter, I think. The dotlock program is the
last which is to be installed. if chgrp fails, who cares since
(at that point) everything else is sucessfully
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 00:26:51 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
If you have no privileged access to a machine, you're probably
the wrong person to install software systemwide. But every
user may install a copy of mutt in $HOME. In this case, 'make
install' is called without root permissions and
--7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Is it possible to specify some kind of regex in mutt's search feature?
The reason I ask is that I've got some mboxes, and a few of them are
substrings of some
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 09:20:09PM -0400, Laurent Pelecq wrote:
Mike Schiraldi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is a permanent URL. The site will move soon.
Which is it?
Which is what? The URL was above I don't understand what you mean.
Those seemed
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-26 01:18]:
Is it possible to specify some kind of regex in mutt's search feature?
The reason I ask is that I've got some mboxes, and a few of them are
substrings of some others (ie, foobar is one mbox, and foobarbaz is
another), and when I
Hi there!
Is there a way to perform a search on all mailboxes, without entering any in
specific? I use maildirs and Mutt 1.5.0i from the CVS. Thanks!
Cheers,
--
David Collantes - http://www.bus.ucf.edu/david/
College of Business Administration, University of Central Florida
If you fear
--AhhlLboLdkugWU4S
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Sven Guckes spake thus:
The reason I ask is that I've got some mboxes, and a few of them are
substrings of some others (ie, foobar is one mbox, and
--zhXaljGHf11kAtnf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Rob 'Feztaa' Park spake thus:
which command do you use for your search?
=20
I'm doing it in a folder hook. The line looks like this:
=20
folder-hook
Do my headers look ok? When I send messages to myself (I'm real lonely) it says
X-Authentication-Warning and gives out some info that you don't need to know. I
looked at google and it suggested adding needmailhelo under the privacy flag section
for sendmail.cf. But that did not work. What
On 04-25-2002 at 23:55 EDT, VB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do my headers look ok? When I send messages to myself (I'm real lonely)
it says X-Authentication-Warning and gives out some info that you don't
need to know. I looked at google and it suggested adding needmailhelo
under the privacy
46 matches
Mail list logo
