Setting folder_format for attachments only
Hi there! It happens that I have to attach several files to a mail, some of which have quite long filenames. In order to read the filenames wholly, I often have to enlarge my Xterm, and this is not what I want. Now, I'd like to either have the possibility to scroll to the left and right side in the folder view (would be nice anyway), or to set a folder_format for directories different to ~/Mail/. I tried this and several variants of it: folder-hook !.*Mail.* 'set folder_format=%3C %t %N %8s %f' It looks like it's matching for ALL folders, including ~/Mail/. Does anybody know how to handle this? I am using Mutt 1.3.99i (2002-05-02) TIA HAND André -- Real programmers use cat a.out
Re: Putting finishing touches on mutt
--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! Andy Saxena spake thus: Hmmm... I have seen this said a few times, however I don't see an =3D sign in front of the mail folders. I use the mbox format; and $folder is set to ~/Mail. =3D is just shorthand for $folder; without =3D, your mboxes could be put anywhere; using =3D makes all your mboxes stay in the $folder. --=20 Rob 'Feztaa' Park http://members.shaw.ca/feztaa/ -- Time as he grows old teaches all things. -- Aeschylus --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE87k3SPTh2iSBKeccRAsRCAJ0XyY1OY5+/T6B5KieYfEzMhSmc7ACfe2bJ rs8rmwTGW67xesJzPBOI/Wo= =yF90 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH--
sort incoming mail to different folders
is it possible for mutt to have the ability of sorting incoming messages from remote POP3 servers into different folders, sort of like a builtin procmail for those who uses mutt's fetch-mail? -- Romano B. Fonbuena email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gnupg: 0xDF5AE5B2
Re: sort incoming mail to different folders
Romano B. Fonbuena wrote: is it possible for mutt to have the ability of sorting incoming messages from remote POP3 servers into different folders, sort of like a builtin procmail for those who uses mutt's fetch-mail? No, you want to use fetchmail+procmail to do this.
Re: sort incoming mail to different folders
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 02:21:16AM +0800, Romano B. Fonbuena wrote: sorry for bothering, but how about sending read mail onto specified folders instead of the default +mbox then? i'm still testing *-hooks and other settings which might do the trick without the need for fetchmail, anyway thanks for taking the time to reply. :) You can use mbox-hook's to move _all_ read mail from one folder into another folder. You can't move messags to different folders from the same incoming mailbox.
Re: sort incoming mail to different folders
Hi, * Romano B. Fonbuena [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-05-24 17:26]: is it possible for mutt to have the ability of sorting incoming messages from remote POP3 servers into different folders, sort of like a builtin procmail for those who uses mutt's fetch-mail? No, you should use Fetchmail and Maildrop for this. Thorsten -- They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin
Re: sort incoming mail to different folders
* On 2002.05.24, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], * Romano B. Fonbuena [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is it possible for mutt to have the ability of sorting incoming messages from remote POP3 servers into different folders, sort of like a builtin procmail for those who uses mutt's fetch-mail? No. You need to use getmail and maildrop for this. Okay, okay, I'm just being a smart-ass. You need a scriptable pop client and a user-side mail filtering program (as opposed to a server-side mail filter). Commonly recommended pop clients: - fetchmail - getmail Commonly-recommended user-side mail filter programs: - procmail - maildrop and I've heard of at least one more in each category, but I don't recall their names. This should be on a FAQ. -- -D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]NSITUniversity of Chicago
Re: sort incoming mail to different folders
* Romano B. Fonbuena [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-24 15:35]: is it possible for mutt to have the ability of sorting incoming messages from remote POP3 servers into different folders, sort of like a builtin procmail for those who uses mutt's fetch-mail? (1) I could tell you - but then I'd have to kill you. (2) you need OUTLOOK EXPRESS! (3) reinstall windows. this is a faq, by the way. Sven [ok, so i need sleep(1)..]
Re: Setting folder_format for attachments only
* Andre Bonhote [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-24 09:14]: folder-hook !.*Mail.* 'set folder_format=%3C %t %N %8s %f' It looks like it's matching for ALL folders.. please explain the pattern! i am sure we can find the problem more easily then... -- Real programmers use cat a.out *yawn* Sven -- $ cat food litter
Re: Listing Mailboxes problem
* Rory Campbell-Lange [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-23 11:38]:
I just updated my mailbox listing in my muttrc file and now I'm not
getting the old '2 to go' and automatic selection of unread mailboxes.
an old one, eh? so - how was it solved then?
do you mind giving a more detailed description?
I'm obviously doing something wrong - I'd be grateful for help.
reinstall windows
lists debian-boot debian-user debian-powerpc vim ..
s/lists/subscribe/ ?!
send-hook . set signature=~/.sig/.signature
no other send-hooks?
then you drop the hook
and simply use the set.
fcc-hook pippa|[Kk]ezia =family
[Kk] - k
set attribution=On %{%d/%m/%y}, %n (%a) wrote:
see sig
--
Rory Campbell-Lange
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.campbell-lange.net
Rory Campbell-Lange
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.campbell-lange.net
be properly aligned!
Sven
--
Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LEARN TO http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/faq/attribution.html
ATTRIBUTE! http://learn.to/attribute
Summary: Name+Address of the author; short date+time optional.
Re: folder-hook and push conflicts with imap?
* Dan Boger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-22 15:58]: is there a way to do what I want to happen (automagically delete dups in each folder) without using push? procmail - message id cache - nuff said. Sven -- # Block duplicate messages that you receive when someone CCs you # on a reply to a mailing list that you are subscribed to. :0: Wh: msgid.lock | formail -D 8192 msgid.cache
Re: Internet Mail Service - RIP!
* Eduardo Gargiulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-20 18:16]: I've verified that all messages that 'breaks' my threads have the following header X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) so, you are right, it's a M$ problem. This header is added by Microsoft Outlook working on a M$ Exchange Server environment. so - what else is new? I'd ban this mailer from all the mailing lists for this very reason. it's time for M$ to *fix* this shit. zero tolerance for such broken stuff! Sven -- Intolerant people should be shot.
Re: mutt colors with X
* VB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-12 05:03]: I have mutt color settings that work just fine in console mode. But when I use mutt from X/gnome, it's all just green on black background. How can I make the color settings work in X? this does not sem to be a mutt problem, right? it's probably your terminal. so don't fix mutt - fix the terminal! use rxvt or xterm-color - and dont reverse bg with fg color! PS: go get a real name and fix that localdomain in your MID! and get a hair cut, too! ;-) Sven
Re: Internet Mail Service - RIP!
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-24-02 18:49]: * Eduardo Gargiulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-20 18:16]: I've verified that all messages that 'breaks' my threads have the following header X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) so, you are right, it's a M$ problem. This header is added by Microsoft Outlook working on a M$ Exchange Server environment. so - what else is new? I'd ban this mailer from all the mailing lists for this very reason. it's time for M$ to *fix* this shit. zero tolerance for such broken stuff! Sven -- Intolerant people should be shot. Sven, hope you get a GOOD nite of sleep. Have a VERY strong cup of coffee in the morning, PLEASE. -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org
Re: vi :s vs sed
* Joel Hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-12 13:46]: If you are good at sed, you can use sed to filter your files while in vi: :1,$ ! sed s/Find/Replace/ this is *so* much better than :%s/Find/Replace/ *snort* If you mess up, u undoes any number of edits. [Cntrl]R undoes the undos. will work for elvis and vim only. won't work when vi is nvi. If you don't use vi, you are missing 1/2 the benefit of linux! get the spelling right: elvis or vim. not vi! Sven -- Sven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: folder-hook and push conflicts with imap?
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 01:41:03AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: * Dan Boger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-22 15:58]: is there a way to do what I want to happen (automagically delete dups in each folder) without using push? procmail - message id cache - nuff said. Sven -- # Block duplicate messages that you receive when someone CCs you # on a reply to a mailing list that you are subscribed to. :0: Wh: msgid.lock | formail -D 8192 msgid.cache actually, I already have that. however, that won't solve my problem, since what I have is an IMAP mailbox that many users can save messages too... often, the same message. while I think some magic with formail can remove dups, I like the idea of it happening when I look at the mailbox... -- Dan Boger [EMAIL PROTECTED] msg28331/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
