-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Jussi Ekholm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
When one does get through, I've been submitting it by hitting S in
the index, which pipes it to spamassassin -d.
Why _on earth_ do you want to run SA with -d switch
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 11:37:26AM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote..
Yes, I'm aware of this. But still, somehow I feel, that the original
author didn't have this in his mind (correct me if I'm wrong, of
course). Although, maybe I'm trying to be too besserwisser here and
speculating things
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 06:00:11PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote..
I press 'S' on a spam, which adds the From-header to this file formail
goes through everytime mail comes in, and if the address can be found
from this file, the mail gets /dev/nulled. It also adds a
blacklist_from foo@bar
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 06:23:02PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
the distinction between bloat and feature
are usually subjective to one's preferences.
i doubt that many users will use such a menu.
besides - what shall this menu offer?
Vikram - can you answer these questions for me?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin Coyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 06:00:11PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote..
#!/bin/sh
#
# $Id: addspam.sh,v 1.5 2002/08/11 07:48:09 ekhowl Exp $
This looks like a pretty nifty solution.
Well, dunno about nifty,
having seen NO traffic for 3 days, have to wonder, ?? Is the list down?
--
Patrick Shanahan
Registered Linux User #207535
http://counter.li.org
Please DO NOT carbon me on replies to list, unless you are requesting
duplicate responces.
It's been a long, hard road, but we're here again.
Recap of the problem:
Mutt would work fine, except when trying to compose a new message, it
would hang after entering subject.
Cause of problem:
set signature='~/.sig'
Now, for the $1000 prize, what could be wrong with that that would cause
I have just started to use mutt but I have one problem I am hoping I can get some help
with. I do send quite a lot of e-mails in Swedish and I am not able to read the extra
letters that the Swedish alphabet has. They show up as question marks. I have emacs
as my editor and when I send mail
* Bytor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have just started to use mutt but I have one problem I am hoping I can get some
help with. I do send quite a lot of e-mails in Swedish and I am not able to read the
extra letters that the Swedish alphabet has. They show up as question marks. I have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
having seen NO traffic for 3 days, have to wonder, ?? Is the list down?
Seems to be working fine here... anyone else?
- --
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://erppimaa.ihku.org/ | 0x1410081E
-BEGIN PGP
An off-topic query concerning spamassassin:
Can it be set to delete spam automatically (I'm not so interested in
just *marking* spam, because if it only marks spam I still have to
sift through it), without getting too many false positives?
I'm thinking of doing something about the 20+ spam
Philip Mak said:
An off-topic query concerning spamassassin:
Can it be set to delete spam automatically (I'm not so interested in
just *marking* spam, because if it only marks spam I still have to sift
through it), without getting too many false positives?
No. The next version of SA - due
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 09:32:03PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
having seen NO traffic for 3 days, have to wonder, ?? Is the list down?
Seems to be working fine here... anyone else?
No problem here.
- --
Sven Guckes wrote:
* Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-18 08:44]:
What would make mutt not report that there is new mail when there is?
Sometimes I will find that it indicates that there is
no new mail, yet when I change to some folders, there is.
i recall some problems about
Michael Leone wrote:
Philip Mak said:
An off-topic query concerning spamassassin:
Can it be set to delete spam automatically (I'm not so interested in
just *marking* spam, because if it only marks spam I still have to
sift through it), without getting too many false positives?
No. The
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002, Michael Elkins wrote:
The only known issue (afaik) about Mutt *not* reporting new mail is
when the user has unset mark_old in their configuration. In this
case a message that would ordinarily be marked as old is still new,
but won't be detected with the file
Will Yardley wrote:
I prefer not to delete anything - but I also receive spam reports and
stuff to my address occasionally, so I can't run the risk of
accidentally deleting one of those.
I have the same experience. It's also useful to save your spam so that
you can contribute back the
I was wondering if something can't be done to fix the interaction
between PGP/MIME and Outlook et al that refuse to show signed messages.
They apparently know enough MIME to recognize that they can't handle
multipart/signed and don't look inside for the text/plain part. I
wonder if a separate
* Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-19 15:05]:
having seen NO traffic for 3 days,
have to wonder, ?? Is the list down?
nope - looks fine. there are 31
mails within the last two days.
Sven
=== --verbose:
Mutt 1.4i: =IN/MUTT (threads) [31/45741] [NEW=39643] [~d 2d]
45368 N L 020818 Jussi
* On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Michael Elkins wrote:
The only known issue (afaik) about Mutt *not* reporting new
mail is when the user has unset mark_old in their
configuration. In this case a message that would ordinarily be
marked as old is still new, but won't be detected with the file
* John Iverson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 08 19, 02 at 16:43:
* On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Michael Elkins wrote:
The only known issue (afaik) about Mutt *not* reporting new
mail is when the user has unset mark_old in their
configuration. In this case a message that would ordinarily be
* Vikram Goyal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-19 13:11]:
The reason I am saying that this thing to be an added
functionality is that hooks and macros are quite a uniq features
of mutt and make it a highly customisable app. It would be
really a boon for people who experiment with these features
* Alan Batie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-19 20:12]:
I was wondering if something can't be done to fix the interaction
between PGP/MIME and Outlook et al that refuse to show signed messages.
yes - someone ought to tell the creators or outlook about RFC2015..
They apparently know enough MIME to
23 matches
Mail list logo
