Trash folder
I am trying to use some folder hooks to create a move-to-trash setup with mutt (1.5.15). However, I only want two of my many folders to work with this. Here is what I have tried: folder-hook =INBOX 'macro index d save-message=INBOX.Trashenter' folder-hook =INBOX.Work 'macro index d save-message=INBOX.Trashenter' folder-hook =INBOX.Trash 'macro index d delete-message' It works, but too well. It seems to ignore that I only want it to copy when in INBOX and INBOX.Work. However, it is using the setup in ALL folders. Any suggestions? -- Matthew Daubenspeck http://oddprocess.org Gentoo Linux x86_64 Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 165 09:42:49 up 70 days, 23:30, 1 user, load average: 0.05, 0.02, 0.00
Re: no fcc with command-line sending
Moin Greg Novack, if you recall, we had some discussion about -i and '' or '|' cmd-line sending behave differently with regard to fcc. I just noticed that even though using script | mutt the mails _are_ fcc'ed normally. But I'm not using fcc to IMAP, so there might be a difference. Did you observe your behaviour with local fcc folders, too? Do you use fcc-hooks or just record+copy? Have you upgraded to the latest mutt (1.5.15)? -- © Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal! EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude. You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
Re: Trash folder
* Matthew Daubenspeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-14 09:48 -0400]: folder-hook =INBOX 'macro index d save-message=INBOX.Trashenter' This hook is applied to all folders that contain =INBOX. when in INBOX and INBOX.Work. However, it is using the setup in ALL folders. Any suggestions? Add $ at the end of the mailboxname. Nicolas -- http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas
Re: Trash folder
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 04:22:11PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: * Matthew Daubenspeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-14 09:48 -0400]: folder-hook =INBOX 'macro index d save-message=INBOX.Trashenter' This hook is applied to all folders that contain =INBOX. when in INBOX and INBOX.Work. However, it is using the setup in ALL folders. Any suggestions? Add $ at the end of the mailboxname. I must have the syntax wrong, as I tried that and it makes no difference: folder-hook =INBOX.$ 'macro index d save-message=INBOX.Trashenter' folder-hook =INBOX.Work$ 'macro index d save-message=INBOX.Trashenter' folder-hook =INBOX.Trash$ 'macro index d delete-message' And I have tried: folder-hook =INBOX$ 'macro index d save-message=INBOX.Trashenter' folder-hook =INBOX.Work$ 'macro index d save-message=INBOX.Trashenter' folder-hook =INBOX.Trash$ 'macro index d delete-message' -- Matthew Daubenspeck http://oddprocess.org Gentoo Linux x86_64 Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 165 10:53:57 up 71 days, 41 min, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
folder-hooks applying too often
=- Matthew Daubenspeck wrote on Sat 14.Apr'07 at 10:55:49 -0400 -= * Matthew Daubenspeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-14 09:48 -0400]: folder-hook =INBOX 'macro index d save-message=INBOX.Trashenter' This hook is applied to all folders that contain =INBOX. when in INBOX and INBOX.Work. However, it is using the setup in ALL folders. Any suggestions? Add $ at the end of the mailboxname. I must have the syntax wrong, as I tried that and it makes no difference: Please re-check how folder-hooks work, maybe http://WIKI.mutt.org/?DebugConfig can help you. catch-all default is what you miss. -- © Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal! EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude. You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
Mutt and GPG: how to manually verify the signature of a message?
Hi to all mutters, and sorry for the likely dumb question I'm posting. I'm testing mutt and gnupg, I can verify with no problem messages signatures, but it fails when I do it manually, saving in distinct files the message and the signature. For example if I save the (clear) message in message, and the signature in signature.asc, then the command: gpg --verify signature.asc message issues a bad signature message. I have setted: set pgp_verify_command=gpg --no-verbose --batch --output - --verify %s %f in the configuration. With no doubt there is on my a part a big misunderstanding of how gpg works, and after much thinkering I'm definitively puzzled. So, which is the correct way to verify by hand the signature of a message? Many thanks in advance. Cheers -- Stefano Sabatini Linux user number 337176 (see http://counter.li.org)
Re: no fcc with command-line sending
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 16:13:07 +0200 Rado S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Moin Greg Novack, if you recall, we had some discussion about -i and '' or '|' cmd-line sending behave differently with regard to fcc. I just noticed that even though using script | mutt the mails _are_ fcc'ed normally. But I'm not using fcc to IMAP, so there might be a difference. Did you observe your behaviour with local fcc folders, too? Do you use fcc-hooks or just record+copy? Have you upgraded to the latest mutt (1.5.15)? How are you getting 1.5.15cvs? CVS still appears to provide me with 1.5.14 from February :-( Thanks.
Re: no fcc with command-line sending
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 08:31:54PM -0400, Trey Sizemore wrote: How are you getting 1.5.15cvs? CVS still appears to provide me with 1.5.14 from February :-( There are nightly snapshots from the mercurial repository at http://dev.mutt.org/nightlies/ me
