Re: A few mutt questions

2008-01-28 Thread Dan H.
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 11:10:59AM +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: folder-hook . unmy_hdr To folder-hook foo my_hdr To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Works like a charm. Since I have a small Python script which, given a list of subscribed mailing list addresses and their folders, autogenerates the

Re: A few mutt questions

2008-01-28 Thread Dan H.
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 02:53:09PM +, Michael Kjorling wrote: Try something like this: set recall=no folder-hook . 'bind index m mail' folder-hook '+mutt-users/?$' 'macro index m mailkill-linemutt-users@mutt.org' Actually I now went with Nicholas' my_hdr approach which works very

Re: A few mutt questions

2008-01-28 Thread Dan H.
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 04:05:10PM -0600, David Champion wrote: It certainly supports this, but it depends on the mail source itself to say what's read. Mutt can alter these flags, but so can other tools. Well, long story short, I see neither 'N' or 'O' flags. My mail comes from three IMAP

Re: Leopard Migration Hammered Mutt

2008-01-28 Thread Eugene
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 09:31:17PM CST, Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since I would like to add /sw/bin to my /etc/profile I opened it, but only discovered: ___ # System-wide .profile for sh(1) if [ -x /usr/libexec/path_helper

buffy-size

2008-01-28 Thread lists
Hello, i'm using mutt 1.5.17 on FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE-20070808. Because my maildir is on nfs i use the buffy_size patch. This generally works i see new mails in my folders which is okay. I also see new mails in folders which are very old, but maybe this is normal for the first run. Don't konw

How to identify unread (new/old) mail -- another bit of info

2008-01-28 Thread Dan H.
Hello, mutt still refuses to identify mail that hasn't been read. Even if new mail comes in during a session while the inbox is open. But here's the thing: 1. No MUA is running, mail comes into inbox. 2. I open mutt. All mail shows up as read. 3. I quit mutt. 4. I start Claws-Mail. Inbox

Another mutt and gpg question

2008-01-28 Thread Dan H.
Hello, encrypting, signing, checking signatures: all works. Sort of. Two hassles: 1. I can't access encrypted mail that I send. When I try to read it, I get Could not copy message. 2. when I receive an encrypted mail, I see a text block of gibberish that I have to manually pipe through

Re: Another mutt and gpg question

2008-01-28 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky
* Dan H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-28 14:28 +0100]: Content-Description: kjlkj ??? 1. I can't access encrypted mail that I send. When I try to read it, I get Could not copy message. See the thread starting with [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nicolas -- http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas

Re: Another mutt and gpg question

2008-01-28 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, January 28 at 02:28 PM, quoth Dan H.: 1. I can't access encrypted mail that I send. When I try to read it, I get Could not copy message. That's by design (but it's a rather uninformative error message). Encrypted email can only be read

Re: automatically check for new mail

2008-01-28 Thread Steve S
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 06:19:59PM +, Raffi Khatchadourian wrote: On Mon 28.Jan'08 at 18:33:17 +0100, Steve S wrote: I'm new to mutt, so this question my have been asked before (I found nothing on the web/in the wiki etc.). In my muttrc I have bind browser n check-new which works ok.

Re: automatically check for new mail

2008-01-28 Thread Raffi Khatchadourian
On Mon 28.Jan'08 at 18:33:17 +0100, Steve S wrote: I'm new to mutt, so this question my have been asked before (I found nothing on the web/in the wiki etc.). In my muttrc I have bind browser n check-new which works ok. I hit `n` manually from time to time to see if there is new mail. Is it

Re: automatically check for new mail

2008-01-28 Thread Steve S
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 07:50:11PM +0100, Steve S wrote: On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 06:19:59PM +, Raffi Khatchadourian wrote: On Mon 28.Jan'08 at 18:33:17 +0100, Steve S wrote: I'm new to mutt, so this question my have been asked before (I found nothing on the web/in the wiki etc.). In

automatically check for new mail

2008-01-28 Thread Steve S
Hi I'm new to mutt, so this question my have been asked before (I found nothing on the web/in the wiki etc.). In my muttrc I have bind browser n check-new which works ok. I hit `n` manually from time to time to see if there is new mail. Is it possible to do that automatically in the

Re: automatically check for new mail

2008-01-28 Thread Steve S
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 10:03:40PM +, Raffi Khatchadourian wrote: On Mon 28.Jan'08 at 19:50:11 +0100, Steve S wrote: My MRA is gets mail controled by a cronjob, but in mutt's folder browser, I see folders makred with 'N' only when I (a) hit `n` or (b) close mutt and restart it. What are

Re: automatically check for new mail

2008-01-28 Thread Raffi Khatchadourian
On Mon 28.Jan'08 at 19:50:11 +0100, Steve S wrote: My MRA is gets mail controled by a cronjob, but in mutt's folder browser, I see folders makred with 'N' only when I (a) hit `n` or (b) close mutt and restart it. What are you using to get new mail? Also, what version of mutt do you have?

Re: A few mutt questions

2008-01-28 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, January 28 at 09:28 AM, quoth Dan H.: On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 04:05:10PM -0600, David Champion wrote: It certainly supports this, but it depends on the mail source itself to say what's read. Mutt can alter these flags, but so can other

Re: Multiple IMAP accounts

2008-01-28 Thread Alain Bench
Hello Florian, On Sunday, January 27, 2008 at 12:41:52 +0100, Florian Unglaub wrote: I set up accounthooks for each account to define spoolfiles, mbox, records etc. You misuse account-hooks; Setup folder-hooks instead. checks on new mail in account B won't work until I manually open

Re: automatically check for new mail

2008-01-28 Thread Leonardo Caldas
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 06:33:17PM +0100, Steve S wrote: Hi I'm new to mutt, so this question my have been asked before (I found nothing on the web/in the wiki etc.). In my muttrc I have bind browser n check-new which works ok. I hit `n` manually from time to time to see if there is