On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:38:10AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
On Sunday, August 9 at 09:14 PM, quoth Robert Holtzman:
The problem was that I stupidly modified the list of mail lists to
duplicate the list of mailboxes. When I went back and realized what I
had done I restored both lists from
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:23:59AM -0400, Marc Vaillant wrote:
Hi all,
I've been a happy mutt user for over a decade. Of course there are a
few minor features here and there that I wish mutt had. The one that's
really getting to me lately is that as far as I know, there is no
automatic
ed schrieb:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:23:59AM -0400, Marc Vaillant wrote:
particularly a problem for IMAP because losing your internet connection
(e.g. sleeping your laptop) usually means losing mailbox changes.
Personally, I'd use screen :)
which, however, doesn't solve the problem
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 09:10:49AM +, ed wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:23:59AM -0400, Marc Vaillant wrote:
Hi all,
I've been a happy mutt user for over a decade. Of course there are a
few minor features here and there that I wish mutt had. The one that's
really getting to me
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 07:26:57AM +0200, Rejo Zenger wrote:
++ 10/08/09 16:44 +0200 - Michael Tatge:
there is no automatic way to execute $. i.e. save changes to
mailbox. This is particularly a problem for IMAP because losing your
internet connection (e.g. sleeping your laptop) usually
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 07:26:57AM +0200, Rejo Zenger wrote:
No messages will be auto deleted.
The only thing that happens is that messages you earlier have marked as
to be deleted will be actually deleted. Or better, any changes you
have made to the status of the message is comitted.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 06:41:51PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 07:26:57AM +0200, Rejo Zenger wrote:
No messages will be auto deleted.
The only thing that happens is that messages you earlier have marked as
to be deleted will be actually deleted. Or better, any
On the python-users mailing lists, there are posts from a user who
forges his From: email address to something like:
Joe User http://phr...@nospam.invalid
The result in mutt with index_format set to:
%-30.30n ...
is that the following is displayed in the index:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tuesday, August 11 at 07:41 PM, quoth Patrick Gen Paul:
Does anyone know why this is happening, and how I can work around it?
I think you pretty much hit the nail on the head: his From: header
is invalid. Mutt can see that it's invalid, and so
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Kyle Wheelerkyle-m...@memoryhole.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tuesday, August 11 at 07:41 PM, quoth Patrick Gen Paul:
Does anyone know why this is happening, and how I can work around it?
I think you pretty much hit the nail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tuesday, August 11 at 09:34 PM, quoth Patrick Gen Paul:
Is there a well-respected mail etiquette, or RFC even, that I could
refer him to?
Ah! Why did you say so? I thought you were trying to decide whether or
not mutt was misbehaving (I
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Kyle Wheelerkyle-m...@memoryhole.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tuesday, August 11 at 09:34 PM, quoth Patrick Gen Paul:
Is there a well-respected mail etiquette, or RFC even, that I could
refer him to?
Ah! Why did you say so?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tuesday, August 11 at 11:47 PM, quoth Patrick Gen Paul:
Funny your mentioning T-Bird, btw, since my correspondent (?)
actually appears to use gnus.
Huh.
Since he's not including a route, the thing within the wockas ()
MUST conform to the
On 11Aug2009 19:41, Patrick Gen Paul pgenp...@gmail.com wrote:
| On the python-users mailing lists, there are posts from a user who
| forges his From: email address to something like:
|
| Joe User http://phr...@nospam.invalid
Ah, so I'm not the only person irritated by this guy.
Possibly mutt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tuesday, August 11 at 11:23 PM, quoth Kyle Wheeler:
wockas..?
:) A name for greater-than and less-than symbols, collectively. Hmm...
I don't know where I got it from (Google has no idea either, though I
may be mispelling it). I thought it
On 12Aug2009 14:56, I wrote:
| I'm thinking about getting procmail to rewrite that header
| as you describe. Maybe (untested):
|
| :0whf
| * ^from:.*http://phr...@nospam.invalid
| | formail -i 'From: Joe User phr...@nospam.invalid'
|
| ahead of the other rules.
I'm now running with this:
16 matches
Mail list logo
