Hi Patrick,
Thanks to your advise. Do you expect that sending to 1000 recipients
on one SMTP session be less than invoking sendmail for 20 time?
-- afshin
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Patrick Ben Koetter p...@state-of-mind.de
wrote:
* afshin afzali a.afzali2...@gmail.com:
I'm using
Hi everybody,
since I couldn't find any CardDAV program for use with mutt, I have
hacked together a small (and ugly) python program for accessing a
CardDAV resource. I have only tested it with davical so far and it has
some more deficiencies (check out the website), but I hope it will still
be
* afshin afzali a.afzali2...@gmail.com:
Thanks to your advise. Do you expect that sending to 1000 recipients
on one SMTP session be less than invoking sendmail for 20 time?
Invoking the sendmail command is much slower, compared to a SMTP Session.
p@rick
-- afshin
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011
* Christian Geier ge...@lostpackets.de:
since I couldn't find any CardDAV program for use with mutt, I have
hacked together a small (and ugly) python program for accessing a
CardDAV resource. I have only tested it with davical so far and it has
some more deficiencies (check out the website),
Mutt have a search function, / , the is very simple. But, it do search
only in the to: and subject: fields.
Are ther a way to do search in all field (to:, subject:, body, etc) of
messages?
How coul I improve mutt search function?
--
Marcelo
Brazil
Linux user number 487797
Hello,
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 12:24:49PM -0300, Marcelo Luiz de Laia wrote:
Mutt have a search function, / , the is very simple. But, it do search
only in the to: and subject: fields.
Are ther a way to do search in all field (to:, subject:, body, etc) of
messages?
How coul I improve
On 14.08.11,12:24, Marcelo Luiz de Laia wrote:
Mutt have a search function, / , the is very simple. But, it do search
only in the to: and subject: fields.
Are ther a way to do search in all field (to:, subject:, body, etc) of
messages?
How coul I improve mutt search function?
You can
The SMTP support is implemented in 1.5.x versions. As stated in
mutt.org the stable version still is 1.4.2.3!
Do you recommend use of 1.5.x in production enviroments?
Thanks,
-- afshin
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter p...@state-of-mind.de
wrote:
* afshin afzali
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 12:24:49PM -0300, Marcelo Luiz de Laia wrote:
Mutt have a search function, / , the is very simple. But, it do search
only in the to: and subject: fields.
Are ther a way to do search in all field (to:, subject:, body, etc) of
messages?
Yes, there's a set of ~
* afshin afzali a.afzali2...@gmail.com:
The SMTP support is implemented in 1.5.x versions. As stated in
mutt.org the stable version still is 1.4.2.3!
Do you recommend use of 1.5.x in production enviroments?
Yes, I recommend using the production version. I use it myself everyday:
p@x220:~$
The last thing,
I could not find last release RPM package for EL5. Would you address
me where I would find it or mutt.spec to build it by myself?
-- afshin
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 9:16 PM, afshin afzali a.afzali2...@gmail.com wrote:
The SMTP support is implemented in 1.5.x versions. As stated
* afshin afzali a.afzali2...@gmail.com:
The last thing,
I could not find last release RPM package for EL5. Would you address
me where I would find it or mutt.spec to build it by myself?
Can't help with that. I switched to Debian/Ubuntu a few years ago.
p@rick
-- afshin
On Sun, Aug
Thanks for your help :)
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter
p...@state-of-mind.de wrote:
* afshin afzali a.afzali2...@gmail.com:
The last thing,
I could not find last release RPM package for EL5. Would you address
me where I would find it or mutt.spec to build it by myself?
13 matches
Mail list logo
