Hi,
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 01:24:44PM -0600, Will Fiveash wrote:
I have a couple of comments about this:
- Why sign most messages? Unless the information is important for
others to verify that it came from a particular person why add the
bloat of a signature. Beyond this I find it
Incoming from Florian Lohoff:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 01:24:44PM -0600, Will Fiveash wrote:
I have a couple of comments about this:
- Why sign most messages? Unless the information is important for
others to verify that it came from a particular person why add the
bloat of a
2013/3/6 Andre Klärner kan...@ak-online.be:
Hi Kunszt,
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 09:05:06AM +0100, Kunszt Árpád wrote:
When I'm using the interactive user-interface everything works fine,
but from the command line it doesn't work. I tried a lot of things,
googled half of the day, but I didn't
I sign most of my messages, even though I only know a few people who
actively use GnuPG/PGP. As I see it, this is one way of promoting
encryption. I.e.: What is that block of gibberish you have at the end
of your emails? That, my friend is my public key. If you have the
right software you can
* Dale Raby daler...@gmail.com [03-06-13 10:39]:
[...]
I see no problem in signing list posts. For those who want to verify
them, its easy to set up, those who don't can ignore them just as
easily. Its not like you are printing them out and reading them from
paper, after all.
Which is the
Incoming from Dale Raby:
encryption. I.e.: What is that block of gibberish you have at the end
of your emails? That, my friend is my public key. If you have the
right software you can verify that I sent you that message, and we can
even send encrypted emails that nobody else can read but
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:37:46AM -0600, Dale Raby wrote:
I sign most of my messages, even though I only know a few people who
actively use GnuPG/PGP. As I see it, this is one way of promoting
encryption. I.e.: What is that block of gibberish you have at the end
of your emails? That, my
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 03:22:47PM -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:37:46AM -0600, Dale Raby wrote:
I sign most of my messages, even though I only know a few people who
actively use GnuPG/PGP. As I see it, this is one way of promoting
encryption. I.e.: What is that
Incoming from Robert Holtzman:
Your dreaming. In my experience 99.9% of the replies are why would I
want to?
That's when you get a chance to explain it. Wouldn't it be neat if
you could order weed from your dealer via email? :-O As opposed to
over the phone with ATT forwarding all your
Incoming from Will Fiveash:
As a side note, I wonder if a pgp/gpg signature as proof of authorship
has ever been tested in court? My guess is no.
The legal community considers fax to be cutting edge reliable tech.
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 04:35:07PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from Robert Holtzman:
Your dreaming. In my experience 99.9% of the replies are why would I
want to?
That's when you get a chance to explain it. Wouldn't it be neat if
you could order weed from your dealer via email?
11 matches
Mail list logo
