Re: Why sign every message? (was Re: Sending attachments without crypt_autosign
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:37:46AM -0600, Dale Raby wrote: I sign most of my messages, even though I only know a few people who actively use GnuPG/PGP. As I see it, this is one way of promoting encryption. I.e.: What is that block of gibberish you have at the end of your emails? That, my friend is my public key. If you have the right software you can verify that I sent you that message, and we can even send encrypted emails that nobody else can read but us. Really?! Tell me more! Is it true that if you want to correspond with people on windoze who use outhouse then it becomes tricky? -- If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. --- Malcolm X
Re: Why sign every message? (was Re: Sending attachments without crypt_autosign
Incoming from Chris Bannister:
Is it true that if you want to correspond with people on windoze who
use outhouse then it becomes tricky?
I. Don't. Care. [about them].
However, it might present a good opportunity to mention Firefox (or
Opera) and Cygwin. Yes, I am (seriously!) biased. Rediculously so
(at times).
Fneh.
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*) :(){ :|: };:
- -
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Why does some list software not honor the headers? (was ... Re: People want ...)
Hei hei, On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 03:47:14PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote: I know not about button[s] as I work with text from the keyboard. But I believe we are saying/mean the same thing, mailing list software should not insert or alter Reply-To: header! Of course not, I know we are on the mutt mailing list here. ;-) But we were talking about other mailing lists used by other users with other MUAs. I heard some of them use buttons and those are exposed to the user while mail headers are usually not. Some more preaching to the choir. Alex P.S.: and I have to get my mutt macros fixed, some hook changed my from address here after I replied on another mailing list … m( *lol* -- »With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably.« (Jean-Luc Picard, quoting Judge Aaron Satie) *** GnuPG-FP: 02C8 A590 7FE5 CA5F 3601 D1D5 8FBA 7744 CC87 10D0 *** pgp7rYCouOQEd.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Why does some list software not honor the headers? (was ... Re: People want ...)
Incoming from Alexander Dahl:
But we were talking about other mailing lists used by other users with
other MUAs. I heard some of them use buttons and those are exposed to
the user while mail headers are usually not.
Blasphemy! :-|
P.S.: and I have to get my mutt macros fixed, some hook changed my
from address here after I replied on another mailing list … m( *lol*
FWIW:
send-hook . set from=your@emailaddy
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*) :(){ :|: };:
- -
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Why does some list software not honor the headers? (was ... Re: People want ...)
Hei hei, On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 10:33:03AM -0700, s. keeling wrote: P.S.: and I have to get my mutt macros fixed, some hook changed my from address here after I replied on another mailing list … m( *lol* FWIW: send-hook . set from=your@emailaddy I have this line in my send hooks: send-hook ~C ^netz39.*@lists\\.netz39\\.de$ my_hdr From: Alexander Dahl a...@netz39.de Where do I put the one above, before or after? What does it actually do and why does it not affect my send hook itself? Greets Alex -- »With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably.« (Jean-Luc Picard, quoting Judge Aaron Satie) *** GnuPG-FP: 02C8 A590 7FE5 CA5F 3601 D1D5 8FBA 7744 CC87 10D0 *** pgp75qFNiVj04.pgp Description: PGP signature
