Re: The etiquette of RTFM (Re: I have forgotten ...)

2013-06-25 Thread Chris Bannister
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 09:03:32PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote: On 21.06.13 10:13, Rado Q wrote: But not to make one side happy and reject the other, how about this: we get 2 lists, one for the basicsimple stuff (mutt-users), the other for advanced (mutt-adventures). Have some moderators

Re: Mutt slow to respond?

2013-06-25 Thread Chris Bannister
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 06:43:25AM +0100, Nigel Green wrote: Hi all, I've used Mutt for a while now and never had any issues with performance, but my latest install feels really laggy. On an index screen there's a gap of half a second or so between hitting a key and the cursor moving, which

Re: The etiquette of RTFM (Re: I have forgotten ...)

2013-06-25 Thread John Niendorf
I've been watching this thread for a while and thinking Good grief, give me a break. This is only my point of view. 1. RTFM is rude. It is usually written by people who seem to feel the need to show that they know more than someone else. 2. Having to put up with people who ask basic

Re: The etiquette of RTFM (Re: I have forgotten ...)

2013-06-25 Thread Mark Filipak
On 2013/6/25 11:47 PM, John Niendorf wrote: I've been watching this thread for a while and thinking Good grief, give me a break. This is only my point of view. 1. RTFM is rude. It is usually written by people who seem to feel the need to show that they know more than someone else. 2. Having to