Re: folder-hook for sending to lists

2014-02-07 Thread glphvgacs
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 04:23:31PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
 On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:03:36AM -0500, glphvgacs wrote:
  and so i get:
  To: mutt-users@mutt.org, ycm-us...@googlegroups.com
  
  i don't know if there is a way to un-hook a hook when one leaves a folder,
  or rather when a pattern for a hook stops to evaluate TRUE.
  
  another guess, this might have something to do with the fact that
  there is no List-id: in mutt-users's headers (wonder why?)
 
 I have an idea that it uses the List-Post: tag.

true, but why? i mean can i set list-reply to look for List-Post in the
header then?


Re: folder-hook for sending to lists

2014-02-07 Thread Chris Bannister
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 05:08:17PM -0500, glphvgacs wrote:
 On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 04:23:31PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
  On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:03:36AM -0500, glphvgacs wrote:
   and so i get:
   To: mutt-users@mutt.org, ycm-us...@googlegroups.com
   
   i don't know if there is a way to un-hook a hook when one leaves a folder,
   or rather when a pattern for a hook stops to evaluate TRUE.
   
   another guess, this might have something to do with the fact that
   there is no List-id: in mutt-users's headers (wonder why?)
  
  I have an idea that it uses the List-Post: tag.
 
 true, but why? i mean can i set list-reply to look for List-Post in the
 header then?

Not sure what you mean here. I was meaning that if the List-id: tag is
there but the List-Post: tag is missing then list-reply doesn't work.

This is from memory, I don't know what the current situation is.

-- 
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the 
oppressing. --- Malcolm X