On 23May2014 19:08, Guy Gold wrote:
===CONFIDENTIAL===
Confidential? Really?
[...]
When it happens, though, sometimes I do see irregular
behaviour. e.g : right in this current thread, when I opened the
mutt mailbox, your messages, from 4:14PM, was right above
Cameron
===CONFIDENTIAL===
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:14:20PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> > I'm trying to understand if it's 'normal' (wink: Derek
> > Martin, if you copy) to have most of my threads sorted
> > not-really-through-date-received.
> Why are you winking at me?
This i
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:05:13PM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> > Thu, May 22, 2014 at 05:19:42PM EDT To mutt-users@mutt.o Display of
> > threads, order in question
> > Thu, May 22, 2014 at 07:22:07PM EDT Cameron Simpson └─>
> > Thu, May 22, 2014 at 08:54:23PM EDT To mutt-users@mutt
Hi Guy,
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 05:19:42PM -0400, Guy Gold wrote:
> I'm trying to understand if it's 'normal' (wink: Derek
> Martin, if you copy) to have most of my threads sorted
> not-really-through-date-received.
Why are you winking at me?
As for your question:
> Sat,May 17 12:19:PM K
* On 23 May 2014, Guy Gold wrote:
>
> That is all true.
> But, I cannot explain some of the behaviour I'm getting.
> Notice the two threads here:
> The first one, is sorted very well according to what I expect.
>
> The second one has some flaws with regards to the sort.
> It looks like, once
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:22:54AM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> * On 23 May 2014, Guy Gold wrote:
> >
> > That, pretty much, is what I'm trying to get to, only reversed,
> > with the newest message, on the bottom. I wonder if other parts
> > of my .muttrc breaking it.
>
> Sort_aux=last-date-
* On 23 May 2014, Guy Gold wrote:
>
> That, pretty much, is what I'm trying to get to, only reversed,
> with the newest message, on the bottom. I wonder if other parts
> of my .muttrc breaking it.
For threading, you need sort=threads. Sort_aux is the only variable.
Reverse- and last- are modu
On Fri,May 23 11:37:AM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> >>I have no idea if it is normal. Besides, that should be irrelevant. Does it
> >>work for you? If so, why? When not, why not?
> >
> >>>
> >>>Sat,May 17 12:19:PM Karl VoitWriting a wrapper for the
> >>> editor: mutt aborts in-betw
