Re: integrated gpg
Hi, On Thu, 12.05.16, at 14:28, Bob Holtzman wrote: > In my plain vanilla setup "p" in the compose window prints out "set > pgp_encrypt = yes" in the headers although that's not set in ~/.muttrc. > No gpg/pgp menu appears at the bottom of the window. No idea what's wrong there. > Mutt -v shows "--enable-gpgme" but adding "set crypt_use_gpgme = yes" to > the ~/.muttrc file has no effect. > > Thanks for the effort. Any other ideas? No, not really. And libgpgme11 is installed? At the moment I've only got the "set crypt_use_gpgme = yes" setting in my .muttrc (I'm experimenting GnuPG with settings) but everything seems to work. Maybe it's your .gnupg/gnu.conf configuration thats needs to be reconfigured? All the best Wim. -- |\ _,,,---,,_ ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-. ;-;;,_ |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' '---''(_/--' `-'\_)
Re: Very annoying quirk in mutt 1.5.24 on xubuntu 16.04
> > ...Why would you ever exit Mutt anyway? =8^) > > > :-) > > On my desktop machine I *don't* often exit from mutt as it tends to > have a dedicated terminal window. However I ssh into my dekstop > machine from all sorts of remote locations using various different > means and then multiple terminals with one dedicated to mutt aren't > really possible. I guess that if you were to run mutt under tmux (or screen) in your desktop, you could ssh to it from your other locations, attach to your tmux session running your mutt window and when finished detach from tmux instead of closing mutt. Regards, Luis -- o W. Luis Mochán, | tel:(52)(777)329-1734 /<(*) Instituto de Ciencias Físicas, UNAM | fax:(52)(777)317-5388 `>/ /\ Apdo. Postal 48-3, 62251 | (*)/\/ \ Cuernavaca, Morelos, México | moc...@fis.unam.mx /\_/\__/ GPG: 791EB9EB, C949 3F81 6D9B 1191 9A16 C2DF 5F0A C52B 791E B9EB
Re: Very annoying quirk in mutt 1.5.24 on xubuntu 16.04
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 08:42:25PM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > > > > I have 'light on dark' terminal windows and mutt seems to want it to > > > > be the other way round. > > > > Have you tried compiling it from source? Or filing a bug report with > > Ubuntu? > > > Yes, I have done that now, hence the recent questions about > differences between 1.5.24 and 1.6.1. My self built 1.6.1 doesn't > exhibit the (reverse video) problem. I assumed as much. I've seen behavior something like this on Ubuntu before (maybe around the 12.x era). I generally self-compile anyway, but was pleased to see that the bug went away when I did. -- Derek D. Martinhttp://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience. pgpwC_rHAk9bT.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Very annoying quirk in mutt 1.5.24 on xubuntu 16.04
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 01:43:10PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 08:53:21AM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 06:36:56PM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > > > I have just upgraded my system to xubuntu 16.04 (from 15.10). It all > > > went very smoothly. > > > > > > However the new (presumably) mutt which is 1.5.24 has a very annoying > > > quirk. It switches the terminal to reverse video when it exits. > > > > > > It appears to be the 'Mailbox is unchanged' (or whatever else is > > > output when I leave) that does the change. > > > > > > I have 'light on dark' terminal windows and mutt seems to want it to > > > be the other way round. > > > > > Anyone? Any ideas? > > Have you tried compiling it from source? Or filing a bug report with > Ubuntu? > Yes, I have done that now, hence the recent questions about differences between 1.5.24 and 1.6.1. My self built 1.6.1 doesn't exhibit the (reverse video) problem. > Why would you ever exit Mutt anyway? =8^) > :-) On my desktop machine I *don't* often exit from mutt as it tends to have a dedicated terminal window. However I ssh into my dekstop machine from all sorts of remote locations using various different means and then multiple terminals with one dedicated to mutt aren't really possible. -- Chris Green
Re: From: oddity
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 10:49:09AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:36:09PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote: > > > > I received an email sent to a group of about 10 family and friends. > > Their addresses are all in the "To:" list, no "Cc:" list. When I > > reply to the message, with either "g" to reply to the group or "r" to > > reply to just the sender, the From: line of the message is set to > > someone other than me. The replyer set to one of the other addresses > > in the list (happens to be the 3rd one, I'm 6th). > > Do you have $reverse_name set, and how is $alternates configured? > $reverse_name is set to yes For alternates I have these 2 lines alternates ".*@labadie\.us" ".*@jgcomp\.org" ".*@jgcomp\.com" unalternates "logwatch@*\.jgcomp\.*" "logcheck@*\.jgcomp\.*" That's it. The email address being selected (my wife) is in the same domain as my address so it is simply matching on the ".*@jgcomp.com". If I remove that from the alternates line the correct address is selected. Thanks, now to ponder how I want to change alternates. Jon -- Jon H. LaBadie j...@jgcomp.com 11226 South Shore Rd. (703) 787-0688 (H) Reston, VA 20190 (703) 935-6720 (C)
Re: Very annoying quirk in mutt 1.5.24 on xubuntu 16.04
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 08:53:21AM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 06:36:56PM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > > I have just upgraded my system to xubuntu 16.04 (from 15.10). It all > > went very smoothly. > > > > However the new (presumably) mutt which is 1.5.24 has a very annoying > > quirk. It switches the terminal to reverse video when it exits. > > > > It appears to be the 'Mailbox is unchanged' (or whatever else is > > output when I leave) that does the change. > > > > I have 'light on dark' terminal windows and mutt seems to want it to > > be the other way round. > > > Anyone? Any ideas? Have you tried compiling it from source? Or filing a bug report with Ubuntu? Why would you ever exit Mutt anyway? =8^) -- Derek D. Martinhttp://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience. pgp7A8r2ZWWHe.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: From: oddity
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:36:09PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote: > > I received an email sent to a group of about 10 family and friends. > Their addresses are all in the "To:" list, no "Cc:" list. When I > reply to the message, with either "g" to reply to the group or "r" to > reply to just the sender, the From: line of the message is set to > someone other than me. The replyer set to one of the other addresses > in the list (happens to be the 3rd one, I'm 6th). Do you have $reverse_name set, and how is $alternates configured? w
From: oddity
This is only happening on one message, but I can't figure out why. I received an email sent to a group of about 10 family and friends. Their addresses are all in the "To:" list, no "Cc:" list. When I reply to the message, with either "g" to reply to the group or "r" to reply to just the sender, the From: line of the message is set to someone other than me. The replyer set to one of the other addresses in the list (happens to be the 3rd one, I'm 6th). I have no "hooks" in my .muttrc that involve the email address selected as the From address. Any guesses as to what could cause this behavior? mutt version 1.6.0 from Fedora 22 repo. Jon -- Jon H. LaBadie j...@jgcomp.com 11226 South Shore Rd. (703) 787-0688 (H) Reston, VA 20190 (703) 935-6720 (C)
Re: Another 1.5.24 to 1.6.1 migration question
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 09:13:22AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 02:57:03PM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > > I have another question regarding 1.6.1 differences from 1.5.24. In > > my index replies to message don't show their subject line correctly, > > for example:- > > > > 18 r + 10-May-16 Jane Chevous( 83) Reshapers > > 19 + 10-May-16 Jane Chevous( 179) M-b~T~TM-b~T~@> > > > > That M-b~T~TM-b~T~@> should be the ASCII graphics 'tree' to the next > > message in the thread. > > > > I guess this is some sort of build configuration issue but I'd be > > pleased for any pointers. > > It might be you didn't compile against a curses version with wide > character support (libncursesw). > > https://dev.mutt.org/trac/wiki/MuttFaq/Charset has some info about this > under "UTF-8 chars are displayed fine, but the screen is garbled". > That's almost certainly the problem:- chris$ ldd `which mutt` | grep curses libncurses.so.5 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libncurses.so.5 (0x7fd857668000) Yes, it is! Thanks very much. It took a while to work out that I had to uninstall libncurses5-dev and install libncursesw5-dev, then rebuild mutt. -- Chris Green
Re: 1.6.1 doesn't seem to use mailcap in the same way as 1.5.23 did - how to fix?
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 09:39:18AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 05:10:59PM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 08:58:45AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 02:53:03PM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > > > > Version 1.6.1 doesn't call /home/chris/bin/muttfox (a script which > > > > handles getting the HTML mail to firefox), version 1.5.24 did. So > > > > what do I need to change to get 1.6.1 to work the way that 1.5.24 used > > > > to? With 1.5.24 the first line of .mailcap was used when you hit 'v' > > > > in mutt. > > > > > > Try hitting m (by default bound to ) in the attachment > > > viewer. > > > > Ah! Thank you, that works. Did the default get changed or what? > > Yes, it did, but earlier than I was involved, so I don't know the > history of it. > OK, I guess I can change it back or learn to hit 'm' instead of return. Now all I need to do is fix the graphics characters problem. -- Chris Green
Re: 1.6.1 doesn't seem to use mailcap in the same way as 1.5.23 did - how to fix?
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 05:10:59PM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 08:58:45AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 02:53:03PM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > > > Version 1.6.1 doesn't call /home/chris/bin/muttfox (a script which > > > handles getting the HTML mail to firefox), version 1.5.24 did. So > > > what do I need to change to get 1.6.1 to work the way that 1.5.24 used > > > to? With 1.5.24 the first line of .mailcap was used when you hit 'v' > > > in mutt. > > > > Try hitting m (by default bound to ) in the attachment viewer. > > Ah! Thank you, that works. Did the default get changed or what? Yes, it did, but earlier than I was involved, so I don't know the history of it. -- Kevin J. McCarthy GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Another 1.5.24 to 1.6.1 migration question
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 02:57:03PM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > I have another question regarding 1.6.1 differences from 1.5.24. In > my index replies to message don't show their subject line correctly, > for example:- > > 18 r + 10-May-16 Jane Chevous( 83) Reshapers > 19 + 10-May-16 Jane Chevous( 179) M-b~T~TM-b~T~@> > > That M-b~T~TM-b~T~@> should be the ASCII graphics 'tree' to the next > message in the thread. > > I guess this is some sort of build configuration issue but I'd be > pleased for any pointers. It might be you didn't compile against a curses version with wide character support (libncursesw). https://dev.mutt.org/trac/wiki/MuttFaq/Charset has some info about this under "UTF-8 chars are displayed fine, but the screen is garbled". -- Kevin J. McCarthy GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: 1.6.1 doesn't seem to use mailcap in the same way as 1.5.23 did - how to fix?
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 08:58:45AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 02:53:03PM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > > Version 1.6.1 doesn't call /home/chris/bin/muttfox (a script which > > handles getting the HTML mail to firefox), version 1.5.24 did. So > > what do I need to change to get 1.6.1 to work the way that 1.5.24 used > > to? With 1.5.24 the first line of .mailcap was used when you hit 'v' > > in mutt. > > Try hitting m (by default bound to ) in the attachment viewer. Ah! Thank you, that works. Did the default get changed or what? -- Chris Green
Re: 1.6.1 doesn't seem to use mailcap in the same way as 1.5.23 did - how to fix?
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 02:53:03PM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > Version 1.6.1 doesn't call /home/chris/bin/muttfox (a script which > handles getting the HTML mail to firefox), version 1.5.24 did. So > what do I need to change to get 1.6.1 to work the way that 1.5.24 used > to? With 1.5.24 the first line of .mailcap was used when you hit 'v' > in mutt. Try hitting m (by default bound to ) in the attachment viewer. -- Kevin J. McCarthy GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: 1.6.1 doesn't seem to use mailcap in the same way as 1.5.23 did - how to fix?
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 05:33:26PM +0300, Alex Poslavsky wrote: > On 05/13, Chris Green wrote: > > I have just locally built mutt 1.6.1 on my xubuntu 16.04 system to use > > instead of the 1.5.24 that xubuntu provides (because of the reverse > > video on exit bug I reported). > > > > It works OK but doesn't seem to use my .mailcap entries in the same > > was as 1.5.24 did. My .mailcap is:- > > Dit you set mailcap? I use 1.6.1 as well, and have: > > set mailcap_path = ~/.mutt/mailcap > I've never set it before, the mailcap I'm using is in the default location ~/.mailcap. I tried adding a 'set mailcap_path' to my muttrc but it made no difference. > About the previous issue, what terminal do you use (or did the problem > go away)? > No, I still have that problem as well. -- Chris Green
Re: Another 1.5.24 to 1.6.1 migration question
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 05:39:04PM +0300, Alex Poslavsky wrote: > On 05/13, Chris Green wrote: > > I have another question regarding 1.6.1 differences from 1.5.24. In > > my index replies to message don't show their subject line correctly, > > for example:- > > > >18 r + 10-May-16 Jane Chevous( 83) Reshapers > >19 + 10-May-16 Jane Chevous( 179) M-b~T~TM-b~T~@> > > > > That M-b~T~TM-b~T~@> should be the ASCII graphics 'tree' to the next > > message in the thread. > > > > I guess this is some sort of build configuration issue but I'd be > > pleased for any pointers. > > Maybe an utf8 issue? Does this look ok? > > Yes and no! :-) When viewed in the mutt pager it's rubbish, when I reply it all shows perfectly in my editor. Yes, it's a UTF-8/graphics issue, the mutt pager isn't displaying characters correctly whereas everything else on my system is. -- Chris Green
1.6.1 doesn't seem to use mailcap in the same way as 1.5.23 did - how to fix?
I have just locally built mutt 1.6.1 on my xubuntu 16.04 system to use instead of the 1.5.24 that xubuntu provides (because of the reverse video on exit bug I reported). It works OK but doesn't seem to use my .mailcap entries in the same was as 1.5.24 did. My .mailcap is:- text/html; /home/chris/bin/muttfox %s text/html; lynx -dump %s; copiousoutput; nametemplate=%s.html application/pdf; /usr/bin/evince %s image/jpeg; ristretto %s %i ; test=test -n "$DISPLAY" Version 1.6.1 doesn't call /home/chris/bin/muttfox (a script which handles getting the HTML mail to firefox), version 1.5.24 did. So what do I need to change to get 1.6.1 to work the way that 1.5.24 used to? With 1.5.24 the first line of .mailcap was used when you hit 'v' in mutt. -- Chris Green
Another 1.5.24 to 1.6.1 migration question
I have another question regarding 1.6.1 differences from 1.5.24. In my index replies to message don't show their subject line correctly, for example:- 18 r + 10-May-16 Jane Chevous( 83) Reshapers 19 + 10-May-16 Jane Chevous( 179) M-b~T~TM-b~T~@> That M-b~T~TM-b~T~@> should be the ASCII graphics 'tree' to the next message in the thread. I guess this is some sort of build configuration issue but I'd be pleased for any pointers. -- Chris Green
Re: Very annoying quirk in mutt 1.5.24 on xubuntu 16.04
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 06:36:56PM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > I have just upgraded my system to xubuntu 16.04 (from 15.10). It all > went very smoothly. > > However the new (presumably) mutt which is 1.5.24 has a very annoying > quirk. It switches the terminal to reverse video when it exits. > > It appears to be the 'Mailbox is unchanged' (or whatever else is > output when I leave) that does the change. > > I have 'light on dark' terminal windows and mutt seems to want it to > be the other way round. > Anyone? Any ideas? -- Chris Green
