Re: textwidth/linewrap

2021-01-07 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 06:40:35PM +0100, Jens John wrote: > On Thu, 7 Jan 2021, at 18:25, tech-lists wrote: > > > > I guess lots of people would use mutt with vim-console. > > > > Can anyone tell me please what setting they use for line > > wrapping? I thought in .vimrc it'd be > > > > set

Re: textwidth/linewrap

2021-01-07 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 07Jan2021 19:15, Matthias Apitz wrote: >El día jueves, enero 07, 2021 a las 06:40:35p. m. +0100, Jens John escribió: >> On Thu, 7 Jan 2021, at 18:25, tech-lists wrote: >> > I guess lots of people would use mutt with vim-console. >> > Can anyone tell me please what setting they use for line >>

Re: textwidth/linewrap

2021-01-07 Thread Christian Brabandt
On Do, 07 Jan 2021, Matthias Apitz wrote: > I do use in ~/.muttrc > > set editor="vim \'+set textwidth=72\' \'+syntax match WarningMsg > /\\%>70v.*/\' -i NONE" If Vim is setup with filetype detection logic, it automatically knows you are editing a mail filetype, because it recognizes the

Re: textwidth/linewrap

2021-01-07 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día jueves, enero 07, 2021 a las 06:40:35p. m. +0100, Jens John escribió: > On Thu, 7 Jan 2021, at 18:25, tech-lists wrote: > > > > I guess lots of people would use mutt with vim-console. > > > > Can anyone tell me please what setting they use for line > > wrapping? I thought in .vimrc it'd

Re: textwidth/linewrap

2021-01-07 Thread Jens John
On Thu, 7 Jan 2021, at 18:25, tech-lists wrote: > > I guess lots of people would use mutt with vim-console. > > Can anyone tell me please what setting they use for line > wrapping? I thought in .vimrc it'd be > > set textwidth=72 > > but that doesn't seem to work. Is it a setting in .muttrc >

textwidth/linewrap

2021-01-07 Thread tech-lists
Hi, I guess lots of people would use mutt with vim-console. Can anyone tell me please what setting they use for line wrapping? I thought in .vimrc it'd be set textwidth=72 but that doesn't seem to work. Is it a setting in .muttrc or in .vimrc? Or an additional setting? thanks, -- J.