weird color behaviour with aterm rxvt
Hi, I've just edited my mutt colors to have a white background. (color normal black white etc.) I am using aterm and when I call mutt with the white background setting it looks awful, not white. Have a look at the screenshot [1]. I tried it with rxvt and it looks the same. Am I doing something wrong? Maybe it's not mutt's fault, then just ignore this post and I am going to find help somewhere else. 1. http://che23.de/mutt_aterm.jpg Thanks, max -- Wenn jemand Freude daran hat, bei Musik in Reih' und Glied zu marschieren, dann verachte ich ihn schon deswegen, weil er sein Gehirn nur wegen eines Irrtums bekommen hat; ein Rückenmark hätte gereicht. - Einstein msg28503/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: weird color behaviour with aterm rxvt
Hi dsr, On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 08:05:46AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You told Mutt to use a white background, but you didn't tell aterm (or rxvt). Actually I did, but I didn't tell, sorry. Invoke your term with -bg white and tell us what happens. It is just the same. When I set -bg Black -fg White it is still the same, doesn't matter what color is set in aterm/rxvt. max -- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s: a--- C++ UL+++ P+ L+++ E--- W+ N++ o++ K- w-- O- M-- V- PS+++ PE-- Y+ PGP++ t--- 5-- X+ R- tv+ b++ DI- D++ G++ e h! r y+ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- msg28505/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Shell script help for Mutt and script newbie.
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 08:05:53PM +0700, Brian Durant wrote: Hi again, Hi, I am trying to write two, two line shell scripts in connection with Mutt, iSpell and newsbody, which is part of spellutils-0.7. I would like to place them in /usr/local/bin. Try http://home.tu-clausthal.de/~mwra/vim/Ispell.vim. Add it to your .vimrc file. It works great for me, I think you have to modify it a bit for danish and you would probably want to change the key-bindings ;-) Bye, max -- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s: a--- C++ UL+++ P+ L+++ E--- W+ N++ o++ K- w-- O- M-- V- PS+++ PE-- Y+ PGP++ t--- 5-- X+ R- tv+ b++ DI- D++ G++ e h! r y+ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- msg28009/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: deleting messages and default folders
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 09:34:28AM -0400, Mike Arrison wrote: Hello Mutters, My switch from Pine to Mutt is going pretty well so far. Good, but maybe you should try an editor which supports automatic line wrapping ;-) - Let's say I delete all messages in a folder by pressing 'd'. Then I go to Undelete them. I can't seem to figure out how to go up to select those deleted messages. The cursor only highlights undeleted messages. I can use 'U' to undelete via a pattern, but I'd rather not have to do that. Am I missing something? You have to (re-)bind your key settings. I have bind index left previous-entry bind index right next-entry in my .muttrc. There is probably a default binding for that, but I don't know it, sorry. max -- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s: a--- C++ UL+++ P+ L+++ E--- W+ N++ o++ K- w-- O- M-- V- PS+++ PE-- Y+ PGP++ t--- 5-- X+ R- tv+ b++ DI- D++ G++ e h! r y+ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- msg27950/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: deleting messages and default folders
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 11:30:21AM -0400, Mike Arrison wrote: please wrap your lines at 72 chars. Thx. I'd very much like to. How would I do that automatically in vi? Is there something like set editor=vim set wrap 72 or something? set editor=vim -c 'set tw=72 et ft=mail' max -- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s: a--- C++ UL+++ P+ L+++ E--- W+ N++ o++ K- w-- O- M-- V- PS+++ PE-- Y+ PGP++ t--- 5-- X+ R- tv+ b++ DI- D++ G++ e h! r y+ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- msg27959/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: about spam
Hi ML :-) I read about spamassassin here and decided to install it myself. Since I am running debian I apt-get install'ed it and did not change any config files. I just added the needed rules to my procmailrc. Well, it works, but I was wondering how a mail in this mailinglist could get a score of 4.4 and a real spam message gets 3.6. That is not very useful, because I want the spam to be filtered to +spam and therefor I have to set the filter-level to ~3.5 or something. But then the regular mailinglist-mails get filtered, too. If this is too OT let me now. We can discuss this elsewhere, but I am very interested to know how I can manage that. Bye, max -- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s: a--- C++ UL+++ P+ L+++ E--- W+ N++ o++ K- w-- O- M-- V- PS+++ PE-- Y+ PGP++ t--- 5-- X+ R- tv+ b++ DI- D++ G++ e h! r y+ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- msg27930/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: about spam
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 02:42:07PM -0400, Rob Reid wrote: It's not too offtopic since it involves this list (and just about every other list ;) Fine :-) I can't answer your question, because I filter all my list mail before the spamassassin check in my .procmailrc. i.e. put something like :0: * ^TOmutt muttin above the spamassassin part. Other people have fancy recipes that attempt to catch all mailing lists in one recipe, but that's OT. Well, I actually filter my list mail before filter with SA, too. But that, indeed, does not answer my question ;-). List filing before spam checking doesn't catch spam in the lists, but the lists I read don't pass on spam to the general membership. Yes, you're *almost* right. OT: 3.6 seems low for a spam. Maybe it's just a fluke, or maybe you should customize the scores on the various spamassassin tests. I think I should customize the scores, yes. I was just wondering how come that spam gets 3.6 and regular mail gets 4.4. I think it is because the default SA scores are set to 4.3 when it detects an empty reply-to field, which is a bit high imo. I'll check that. Bye, max -- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s: a--- C++ UL+++ P+ L+++ E--- W+ N++ o++ K- w-- O- M-- V- PS+++ PE-- Y+ PGP++ t--- 5-- X+ R- tv+ b++ DI- D++ G++ e h! r y+ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- msg27934/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Apostrophe
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 01:34:20PM +0100, Dean Richard Benson wrote: Is there any way to make the \222 be displayed correctly? Maybe you can use charset-hook in your muttrc, for example: # aliases for broken MUAs charset-hook windows-1250 CP1250 charset-hook windows-1251 CP1251 charset-hook windows-1252 CP1252 charset-hook windows-1253 CP1253 charset-hook windows-1254 CP1254 charset-hook windows-1255 CP1255 charset-hook windows-1256 CP1256 charset-hook windows-1257 CP1257 charset-hook windows-1258 CP1258 Bye, max -- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s: a--- C++ UL+++ P+ L+++ E--- W+ N++ o++ K- w-- O- M-- V- PS+++ PE-- Y+ PGP++ t--- 5-- X+ R- tv+ b++ DI- D++ G++ e h! r y+ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- msg27886/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Apostrophe
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 03:10:20PM +0100, Dean Richard Benson wrote: Hi Dean, This seemed like a great idea, but unfortunately still didn't work. Is there any more I can tell you about the source emails that might help? (sorry still a bit of a mutt-newbie) I am mutt-newbie, as well :-). I just found that somewhere in the example rc's on the net. I thought it may help, but see the follow-up by Mark. He explains that problem very well. Bye, max -- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s: a--- C++ UL+++ P+ L+++ E--- W+ N++ o++ K- w-- O- M-- V- PS+++ PE-- Y+ PGP++ t--- 5-- X+ R- tv+ b++ DI- D++ G++ e h! r y+ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- msg27892/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
