[OT] sendmail query to relay but suppress rejection messages

Hello, My query is not related to mutt as such but sendmail, so please excuse me if it bothers you. I need to tweak sendmail in such a way that it does not sends back rejection messages back to one of the sending machine. The mails are all for local domain but the sending software is proprietary

Re: New mail to list.

. They just respect all of God's creation lock, stock barrel. Kinda OT but couldn't resist -- Vikram Goyal [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Mutt+Vim: ugly block cursor when editing

it at the top of your vimrc. -- Vikram Goyal [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: location of signature.

was taught some lessons by the guardians. :-) Thank you. Bo Also remember some people have taught their editors to remove sigs automatically while replying. Just imagine what would happen to the message with a top signature. -- Vikram Goyal [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: hook-list menu

and can see what they are supplying to mutt and what its getting. Sven - just think about it. -- Vikram Goyal [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: how to view -hook list -- show-hook-list

On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 09:50:20PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: to write these to a file so he can monitor them. a menu would be nicer, of course, but... bloat? Sven of-course not but an added functionality. -- Vikram Goyal [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: filename completion in the source command

On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 07:35:43AM -0500, Patrick wrote: * Vikram Goyal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [07-21-02 07:33]: On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 05:17:58PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: people who hide their name on purpose usually are a pita. they do not deserve too much

Re: folder-hook push not responding as expected.

On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 04:23:31PM +0200, Cedric Duval wrote: Hello Cedric, Also I think that it should be the default of tag-prefix i.e if the tag-pattern isn't there tag-prefix should abort Yes, I also think this would be better, at least for all these automatic operations dealing

Re: folder-hook push not responding as expected.

On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 08:17:29PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: Please do NOT reply to random messages, create a new thread instead. Sorry for the goof up. try folder-hook !Trash push 'enter-commandunset maildir_trashenter' This problem is solved. But now I am having a problem further

folder-hook push not responding as expected.

Hello Dear Mutters, I am using version 1.3.28i. I have defined a folder-hook as: folder-hook !Trash push enter-commandunset maildir_trashenter But the error coming is 'push too many arguments' How can I resolve this. Please point me where I am wrong. Thanks in advance. vikram... --