Here is a script to use formail to remove dups:
rm id-cache
formail -q- -D 12000 id-cache mutt-l -s mutt-lx
ls -l mutt-l mutt-lx
Just remember to copy the user id/gid before:
mv mutt-lx mutt-l
--
Later ...
Rich Roth --- On-the-Net
Direct: Box 927,
On Sat, Jul 17, 1999 at 02:41:17PM +1100, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
I have played with a Win'95 server program that could be address from a Mutt
mailcap, called 'doc server'. It's on one of the mutt resource pages - I
I was intending to play with this further too, but I was under the
On Sat, Jul 17, 1999 at 05:06:02PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also think we could expand this base a lot if pre-compiled DOS and/or
W32 binaries were easily available.
I think people using binaries aren't very likely to contribute.
Maybe in raw percent, but the actual use would go
You might check out my slang language extensions, which allows adding an
arbitrty headers and doing whatever you want with them (display, sort, tag,
etc). I built a whole project/tag manager with them.
It's all at:
http://www.katn.com/opensw/#mutt
The last version I did was 0.95
You might check out aspell - much better spell checking logic, very BAD
interface -- but it might be a solution and they keep improving the interface:
http://metalab.unc.edu/kevina/aspell
--
Later ...
Rich Roth --- On-the-Net
Direct: Box 927, Northampton, MA 01061, Voice:
On Sun, Jun 13, 1999 at 10:52:51PM -0600, Tkil wrote:
| Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 21:10:28 +875400
| X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88e
Thanks BUT VERY old news - this was (heavily) discussed (and fixed) right
after the first (of Jan, 1999).
--
Later ...
Rich Roth --- On-the-Net
Direct: Box 927,
I think John answered it a few weeks ago - there is also a new development
release see www.slang.org and the new release in:
From John (Jun-06-1999)
Yesterday, I released version 1.3.7 of the slang library (and version
0.99-6 of jed). The library is available from:
On Mon, Jun 07, 1999 at 02:50:47PM -0400, rfi from Rich Roth wrote:
release see www.slang.org and the new release in:
Sorry - that's http://www.s-lang.org
--
Later ...
Rich Roth --- On-the-Net
Direct: Box 927, Northampton, MA 01061, Voice: 413-586-9668
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, Jun 01, 1999 at 11:13:07AM +0800, Duncan Sargeant wrote:
I'm looking for a way to put empty headers in an email messages so that
when I compose a new message, the header fields are there for me.
...
So that I can just fill in the header field when I edit my messages.
As I recall,
On Wed, Jun 02, 1999 at 08:33:11PM +0800, Duncan Sargeant wrote:
solution. I was after builtin support, and the dummy letter will mean
I have to strip the headers manually if I don't want to use them.
What I should have asked is: is there any reason why my_hdr doesn't
accept empty
On Wed, Jun 02, 1999 at 07:24:41AM -0400, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
I have a large mailbox of work mail, and I often move old messages out
to a corresponding compressed mailbox. There ought to be an easy way
I have a similiar setup and solve it by rolling all my large mailboxes,
inbox
On Thu, May 20, 1999 at 11:45:33PM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
from OE) to netscape mailbox, which I presume is mbox. I haven't tried
it myself.
Unfortunately netscape mailbox is nowhere near mbox :(
Sure looks like it to me, the first line is a bit weird though, no host name
From -
On Tue, May 11, 1999 at 10:28:22AM -0500, Kenny Elliott wrote:
My /usr/include/unistd.h simply does an "#include asm/unistd.h" and my
/usr/include/asm/unistd.h which is a link to
/usr/src/linux/include/asm-i386/unistd.h has no mention of R_OK.
Mine is a full file with the version comment of:
On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 10:59:04AM -0500, Kenny Elliott wrote:
Not enough information. Which version of Linux? On my Linux systems,
R_OK is defined in fcntl.h.
You actually supplied enough information above for me to fix the problem.
Thanks! I had to and and include for fcntl.h in
On Mon, May 03, 1999 at 07:52:45AM -0500, Jim Graham wrote:
problem Let's say there's an incoming message with that has spaces
in the filename (yeah, I know...but some people seem to think it's a
good thing). In other words, something like this:
begin 600 99 Travel Expense Report
On Tue, Apr 20, 1999 at 10:27:06AM +0300, Petri Kaukasoina wrote:
I have mutt with slang-1.2.2 in rxvt-2.19 and don't get any extra spaces
even when I copy and paste several lines at the same time. In xterm (from
XFree86 3.3.3.1) I do get the extra spaces.
I forwarded this to the author of
On Sat, Apr 10, 1999 at 01:58:04PM +0200, Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote:
P.S.: this is becoming an faq, do we have an active faq maintainer ?
Which brings up the question of what happened to the expected web site
enhancements ?? (www.mutt.org is still listing 0.95.1)
--
Later ...
Rich Roth ---
On Wed, Apr 07, 1999 at 12:34:47PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
On 1999-04-06 16:54:36 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I use `v' I can only see garbage there ... how can I deal with
these signatures? is there anyway they can be checked as pgp/mime
sigs are?
Not yet. I'm playing
On Thu, Apr 08, 1999 at 03:38:15PM +0200, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
My understanding is that you'd have to start from scratch - the tool
kit is US/Gov developed and blocked from export.
Thomas doesn't need to do so, because someone else did:
That's what I was hoping - I have a probably
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 03:36:35PM -0500, David Shaw wrote:
Actually, there is some sort of POP magic that can be used to send mail
via the POP daemon. I don't know how widely supported it is. I suppose
Never heard of it - Sounds like some nifty idea the spec writer threw in
that no one has
On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 11:48:02PM +0200, Christian R Molls wrote:
does mutt's internal pop-support forward mail via sendmail or via port 25?
I think you have a mis-understanding of POP - pop has nothing to do with
forwarding or, for that matter, sending email - and Mutt, does use a MTA
(like
On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 11:37:11AM -0800, Brandon Long wrote:
text/enriched; /home/binde/bin/rtfreader %s; copiousoutput
...
rtfreader program I know about actually reads application/ms-rtf or the
Do you have a location for this program ??
--
Later ...
Rich Roth --- On-the-Net
On Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 08:29:58AM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
On 1999-03-09 21:12:55 -0600, Josh Hildebrand wrote:
The times when I get just the first word of the filename saved is
when I do a '| uudecode' (without -o and the filename).
This is obviously a problem with the version of
On Tue, Mar 09, 1999 at 12:54:50AM -0600, Josh Hildebrand wrote:
Certainly there is either a way to tell mutt to handle the spaces properly,
or to create a macro that grabs the file name with
| head -1 | cut -d ' ' -f 3-
and then runs uudecode -o on it.. I'm not sure how to do that in
On Sat, Mar 06, 1999 at 12:01:29PM +, John Poltorak wrote:
Which editor do mutt users generally recommend for creating emails?
I would prefer something which works fairly intuitively using a PC
keyboard - ie uses cursor keys, PgUp, PgDn, Home, End etc...,
and use of colour would be
On Thu, Feb 18, 1999 at 03:04:57PM -0800, Brandon Long wrote:
You can also use text/enriched messages instead of text/plain. To each
their own. With text/enriched, at least, most modern mailers have a
chance of handling it.
Are you saying that Mutt will display text/enriched with color
On Fri, Feb 05, 1999 at 11:25:56PM -0800, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
This whole mailing list situation is really silly. When Michael Elkins
ran the lists at Harvey Mudd College, they were open, and there was
practically no spam. The new maintainer has admitted that the reason
The world is not
27 matches
Mail list logo
