Passing parameters to gpg

[tmg]

Is there any way to pass extra parameters to gpg?

Re: next-message command

[tmg]

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,
 
 just wondering if there is a next-message command or something in the
 index, I want to be able to just go to the next message in some instances,
 but if a message has been read once, and is marked for deletion,. then using
 the commands such as, next-new next-unread wont get me there, and if the
 message is not a thread starter, I can't get to it via next-thread,

There might be a better way but you can type the message number in
the index or pager to go to any message.

Re: Email client poll

[tmg]

* Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 It isn't at all.  Mostly we were talking about people using other mailers
 (like Pine) not because they liked the features the most but out of
 inertia.  As I said, *if we care*, there are things we could try to do
 about this.  If we don't care, we ignore it.

It is possible that some people actually like Pine better than
Mutt, as absurd as that seems to us ;) If they really don't like
it, they'll find something else (like I did).

Re: Email client poll

[tmg]

* David Thorburn-Gundlach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 % Why is it so important that Mutt be #1 on a Slashdot poll?
 % Just curious.
 
 BECAUSE MUTT RULZ, d00d!!!

Then it should promote itself, G.

Re: Email client poll

[tmg]

* Tom Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 So we can win 'mindshare', and mutt will continue to work as the 'net
 evolves. See http://www.cryptonomicon.com/beginning.html.

I think we're not giving people enough credit. Just because they
use some other mailer we think it's because they're forced to or
don't know any better. It is possible that they actually like it
better than Mutt.. not everyone has the same noodle in their gord.

FYI, Linus Torvalds himself uses Pine. So it's not just newbies
or morons.

Re: Annoying feature

[tmg]

David DeSimone wrote:

 So don't leave Mutt.
 
 macro index G "shell-escapefetchmailenter"

Sweet.

Re: Annoying feature

[tmg]

Thomas Roessler wrote:

 Me too. Just thought it might be convenient sometimes to not have
 to leave mutt.
 
 So just run fetchmail in daemon mode.

Not very convenient on a dialup connection. Usually when
I want my mail I want it NOW! (yes, I know about demand
dialing) I think the macro suits me perfectly.

Re: Annoying feature

[tmg]

Randall J. Million wrote:

 Write a macro that will call fetchmail. Should work, but I don't use
 fetchmail.

I'll look into that.

Re: Annoying feature

[tmg]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Why not use fetchmail instead? I'm using qmail+fetchmail+procmail+mutt
 over here.

Me too. Just thought it might be convenient sometimes to not have
to leave mutt.