This one time, at band camp, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
Not for list-reply. The important thing to make this command work is
letting mutt know which mails are from lists, using the 'subscribe' and
'lists' commands.
Bleargh. What a pain in the ass. Most of my mailing lists identify
themselves
Shawn --
...and then Shawn McMahon said...
%
% This one time, at band camp, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
%
% Not for list-reply. The important thing to make this command work is
% letting mutt know which mails are from lists, using the 'subscribe' and
% 'lists' commands.
%
% Bleargh. What a
This one time, at band camp, David T-G wrote:
So, since lists are so easy to recognize, have a script that generates
mailing list names from your directories and put something like
Mailing lists aren't easy to recognize, at least when they don't
put in a header, but you're forgetting that
On Mar 15, Shawn McMahon [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
Not for list-reply. The important thing to make this command work is
letting mutt know which mails are from lists, using the 'subscribe' and
'lists' commands.
Bleargh. What a pain
* Shawn McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-15 09:41:11 -0500]:
Mailing lists aren't easy to recognize, at least when they don't put in a
header, but you're forgetting that this will only come up if the user hits
the list-reply key, thereby TELLING mutt that the email was from a list.
Perhaps
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 02:57:36PM +, Dave Pearson wrote:
* Shawn McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-15 09:41:11 -0500]:
Mailing lists aren't easy to recognize, at least when they don't put in a
header, but you're forgetting that this will only come up if the user hits
the list-reply
This one time, at band camp, Dave Pearson wrote:
Perhaps I'm missing something here but I don't use list-reply to tell mutt
that an email is from a mailing list, I use list-reply to tell mutt that I
want to respond to the list it was from (instead of to the author of the
email, or
Shawn --
...and then Shawn McMahon said...
%
% This one time, at band camp, Dave Pearson wrote:
%
% Perhaps I'm missing something here but I don't use list-reply to tell mutt
% that an email is from a mailing list, I use list-reply to tell mutt that I
% want to respond to the list it was
On Mar 15, Shawn McMahon [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Dave Pearson wrote:
Perhaps I'm missing something here but I don't use list-reply to tell mutt
that an email is from a mailing list, I use list-reply to tell mutt that I
want to respond to the list it was
* Shawn McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-15 10:17:37 -0500]:
This one time, at band camp, Dave Pearson wrote:
Perhaps I'm missing something here but I don't use list-reply to tell
mutt that an email is from a mailing list, I use list-reply to tell
mutt that I want to respond to the
This one time, at band camp, David T-G wrote:
BTW, subscribe is a superset of lists; you'll only need one for lists on
which you are and then one for lists on which you aren't.
Yeah, figured that one out after I posted. :-)
Great. Start coding. Post the result. TIA HAND
Trust me, you
This one time, at band camp, David Champion wrote:
Personally, I don't like the idea of hard-coding mutt to recognize
mailing lists according to commonly-observed trends that aren't
specified by a reasonably standard standard. There are many ways
to identify a mailing list. Mutt shouldn't
* On 2002.03.15, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Shawn McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This one time, at band camp, David Champion wrote:
Personally, I don't like the idea of hard-coding mutt to recognize
mailing lists according to commonly-observed trends that aren't
specified by a
* Simon White [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 12:51]:
14-Mar-02 at 12:39, Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote / schreibt :
now, if crontab does all this then you probably have to use /dir/mutt.
You telepathic fiend you. (idiomatic word order, for your English notes Sven)
*grin*
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 13:55:59 +0100]:
* Simon White [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 12:51]:
Don't follow... what am I doing wrong?
well, you have to be subscribed to the list to be able to send to it. so I
know that when I reply to the list you'll get a copy. So this
* Dave Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 14:14]:
So this Mail-Followup-To seems redundant [on a closed list]
Could it not be the case that the personal entry in
Mail-Followup-To might be pointing to an address with which
the author isn't subscribed to the list? This might be an
address
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 15:26:01 +0100]:
oh - you mean, this Mail-Followup-To is for extra notification?
Please actually read what I write. I mean it could be one use for someone.
You asked a question, I provided one possible answer. Once again it seems
that such a question
This one time, at band camp, Simon White wrote:
Ahh yes there is. L (list-reply). Or whatever you map it to in your muttrcs.
Cool.
Except it doesn't work with any mailing list I've tried.
Including, for example, this one...
msg25508/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 12:20:06PM -0500, Shawn McMahon wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Simon White wrote:
Ahh yes there is. L (list-reply). Or whatever you map it to in your muttrcs.
Cool.
Except it doesn't work with any mailing list I've tried.
Including, for example, this
14-Mar-02 at 12:20, Shawn McMahon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
This one time, at band camp, Simon White wrote:
Ahh yes there is. L (list-reply). Or whatever you map it to in your muttrcs.
Cool.
Except it doesn't work with any mailing list I've tried.
I just hit SHIFT-L and this
20 matches
Mail list logo
