Re: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter

2002-01-02 Thread Andre Majorel
On 2002-01-01 10:03 +, Benjamin Smith wrote: On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 01:36:03PM +0100, Andre Majorel wrote: On 2001-12-28 18:22 +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: I thought that message-hook ~f joe@blow\.com pipe-message /usr/local/bin/unmangle would do the trick

Re: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter

2002-01-01 Thread Benjamin Smith
(Neat feature: tagged reply) On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 01:36:03PM +0100, Andre Majorel wrote: On 2001-12-28 18:22 +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: I thought that message-hook ~f joe@blow\.com pipe-message /usr/local/bin/unmangle would do the trick but Mutt says pipe-message:

Re: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter

2001-12-31 Thread Andre Majorel
On 2001-12-28 11:19 -0500, Dan Boger wrote: On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 05:09:05PM +0100, Andre Majorel wrote: There is one guy out there who has particular and very annoying writing idiosyncracies (think Prince or B1FF). I wrote a filter to translate his prose to something less obnoxious. Now

Re: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter

2001-12-31 Thread Andre Majorel
On 2001-12-28 18:22 +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: I thought that message-hook ~f joe@blow\.com pipe-message /usr/local/bin/unmangle would do the trick but Mutt says pipe-message: unknown command. It's pipe-message (incl. the angle brackets) isn't it? I've tried that too and

Re: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter

2001-12-31 Thread Andre Majorel
On 2001-12-28 17:15 +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 05:09:05PM +0100, Andre Majorel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought that message-hook ~f joe@blow\.com pipe-message /usr/local/bin/unmangle would do the trick but Mutt says pipe-message: unknown command.

Re: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter

2001-12-30 Thread David T-G
Andre Dan -- ...and then Andre Majorel said... % % There is one guy out there who has particular and very annoying % writing idiosyncracies (think Prince or B1FF). I wrote a filter to ... ...and then Dan Boger said... % % well, not sure how to do it with mutt - I have written a similar

Using message-hook to run messages through a filter

2001-12-28 Thread Andre Majorel
There is one guy out there who has particular and very annoying writing idiosyncracies (think Prince or B1FF). I wrote a filter to translate his prose to something less obnoxious. Now how do I configure Mutt to automatically pipe his messages through the filter when reading or replying to him ?

Re: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter

2001-12-28 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 05:09:05PM +0100, Andre Majorel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought that message-hook ~f joe@blow\.com pipe-message /usr/local/bin/unmangle would do the trick but Mutt says pipe-message: unknown command. I would try message-hook . unset display_filter

Re: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter

2001-12-28 Thread Dan Boger
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 05:09:05PM +0100, Andre Majorel wrote: There is one guy out there who has particular and very annoying writing idiosyncracies (think Prince or B1FF). I wrote a filter to translate his prose to something less obnoxious. Now how do I configure Mutt to automatically pipe

Re: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter

2001-12-28 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 17:09:05 +0100 From: Andre Majorel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter There is one guy out there who has particular and very annoying writing idiosyncracies (think Prince or B1FF). I wrote a filter