Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.8 is out

2000-03-21 Thread Stephan Seitz
Hi! On Son, Mär 12, 2000 at 10:54:45 -0500, David T-G wrote > it into the standard distribution. While mutt *does* do pretty > darned much everything, and well, and fast, and so on, there is a > constant battle against code bloat and creeping featurism. Since Hm, you think so? Some patches are

Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.8 is out

2000-03-12 Thread David T-G
Stephan -- ...and then Stephan Seitz said... % Hi! % % On Sam, Mär 04, 2000 at 02:19:36 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote % > Mutt-1.1.8 is out. This is another BETA version. Changes % % I would like to know, which patches for 1.0 are part of the new % version. % I am using the save_alias-patch an

Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.8 is out

2000-03-10 Thread Stephan Seitz
Hi! On Sam, Mär 04, 2000 at 02:19:36 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote > Mutt-1.1.8 is out. This is another BETA version. Changes I would like to know, which patches for 1.0 are part of the new version. I am using the save_alias-patch and the compressed_folder-patch. The manual for 1.1.8 doesn't m

Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.8 is out

2000-03-09 Thread David T-G
Mrinal -- ...and then Mrinal Kalakrishnan said... % Hi, Hi! % % Gero Treuner typed: % > Not exactly. There are development-only (non-BETA) versions, as % > 1.1 through 1.1.5 are. % % OK, I didn't know that. I just labelled all versions that are not the % stable release as `beta'. Not a bad

Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.8 is out

2000-03-09 Thread Mrinal Kalakrishnan
Hi, Gero Treuner typed: > > No, the minor version is what shows whether it's beta or not. So in > > 1.1.8, second `1' shows that it's a beta version. The stable release > > will be 1.2.x. > Not exactly. There are development-only (non-BETA) versions, as > 1.1 through 1.1.5 are. OK, I didn't know

Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.8 is out

2000-03-09 Thread Mrinal Kalakrishnan
Hi, Eugene Lee typed: > Besides, when releasing software that is still in beta testing, how do > you count versions according to the Linux kernel way? For example, the > previous Mutt beta was 1.1.7. Since the current release is still beta, > shouldn't it be numbered as 1.1.9 ? No, the minor v

Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.8 is out

2000-03-09 Thread Gero Treuner
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 04:18:20PM +0530, Mrinal Kalakrishnan wrote: > No, the minor version is what shows whether it's beta or not. So in > 1.1.8, second `1' shows that it's a beta version. The stable release > will be 1.2.x. Not exactly. There are development-only (non-BETA) versions, as 1.1 th

Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.8 is out

2000-03-09 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2000-03-09 01:56:21 -0800, Eugene Lee wrote: > Besides, when releasing software that is still in beta > testing, how do you count versions according to the > Linux kernel way? For example, the previous Mutt beta > was 1.1.7. Since the current release is still beta, > shouldn't it be numbered

Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.8 is out

2000-03-09 Thread Eugene Lee
On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 11:13:14AM +0100, Thomas Mueller wrote: : :> :Mutt-1.1.8 is out. This is another BETA version. Changes :> :against 1.1.7 include fixes for one recent and one :> :long-standing, but mostly unnoticed bug. :> :> Just a quick observation. Mutt is one of the few pieces of so

Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.8 is out

2000-03-07 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Eugene! > :Mutt-1.1.8 is out. This is another BETA version. Changes > :against 1.1.7 include fixes for one recent and one > :long-standing, but mostly unnoticed bug. > > Just a quick observation. Mutt is one of the few pieces of software > that gets full version numbers for betas, versus m

Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.8 is out

2000-03-05 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
On Sun, Mar 05, 2000 at 03:53:48AM -0800, Eugene Lee wrote: > Just a quick observation. Mutt is one of the few pieces of software Few -- like the Linux Kernel? > that gets full version numbers for betas, versus most conventions that > use a next-version-number + "b" + beta-version-number. I j

Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.8 is out

2000-03-05 Thread Eugene Lee
On Sat, Mar 04, 2000 at 02:19:36PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote: :Mutt-1.1.8 is out. This is another BETA version. Changes :against 1.1.7 include fixes for one recent and one :long-standing, but mostly unnoticed bug. Just a quick observation. Mutt is one of the few pieces of software that get

Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.8 is out

2000-03-04 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
On Sat, Mar 04, 2000 at 03:36:34PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > I thought it was about time that I give it a spin on HP-UX 10.20. > Works flawlessly. > The only problem I have is that I had to comment out these (which worked in > 1.0.1i): > > # set pgp_default_version=pgp5 > # set pgp_encr

Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.8 is out

2000-03-04 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
On Sat, Mar 04, 2000 at 02:19:36PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote: > Mutt-1.1.8 is out. This is another BETA version. Changes > against 1.1.7 include fixes for one recent and one > long-standing, but mostly unnoticed bug. I thought it was about time that I give it a spin on HP-UX 10.20. Works fla

[Announce] mutt-1.1.8 is out

2000-03-04 Thread Thomas Roessler
Mutt-1.1.8 is out. This is another BETA version. Changes against 1.1.7 include fixes for one recent and one long-standing, but mostly unnoticed bug. You can download the code from . Additionally, it should be propagated to the usual mirror sites listed at