Re: [OT] Vim

2002-08-27 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park


--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Alas! Ken Weingold spake thus:
 On Mon, Aug 26, 2002, Kai Weber wrote:
  + Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 =20
   Yeah, but with procmail I can send them to /dev/null.  With
   Spamassassin they go to my spam folder for review.
 =20
  You can use procmail to filter the spamassasin'ated mails to /dev/null,
  too.
=20
 I would never do that.  Sometimes Spamassassin catches real mail as
 spam.

blacklisting adds 100 to the score. All you really have to do is set
your procmail rules so that mails with a score over 90 are sent to
/dev/null, and mails with less are sent to your spam folder. Then you
get pretty much the best of both worlds.

--=20
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
http://members.shaw.ca/feztaa/
--
All I ask of life is a constant and exaggerated sense of my own importance.

--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9azhwPTh2iSBKeccRAuXhAJ9EcIrhiFouSpuHdCZglHSrcwdQSwCfQ4yf
MwDXfxdUEKUH22GsiZEKWZc=
=dOmP
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ--



Re: [OT] Vim

2002-08-27 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park


--cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Alas! Michael Leone spake thus:
 it's been my experience that the latest SA (v2.31) is much better at=20
 distinguishing real mail from spam than earlier version. And v2.40 is due
 Really Really Soon Now, they say.

I've been using v 2.31 for a couple weeks now and I've seen *NO*
troubles with it. It has caught every spam, and allowed every real
message that I've gotten so far. I only get 50 to 100 emails per day,
unlike some people here, but a 0% failure rate is pretty good, no?

--=20
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
http://members.shaw.ca/feztaa/
--
Unix will self-destruct in five seconds... 4... 3... 2... 1...

--cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9azjrPTh2iSBKeccRAmD5AJ9lyM+dDEvgfhDIK1GwqAoVQjwBTwCfVNw8
a7hYoxjAAtkFIMyYbzvkins=
=jctu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp--



Re: [OT] Vim

2002-08-26 Thread Ken Weingold

On Fri, Aug 23, 2002, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
  add address to procmailrc. ;-)
 
 Get with the times, Sven! Adding an address to a Spamassassin blacklist
 is *so* much easier to maintain than a hairy mess of procmail rules ;)

Yeah, but with procmail I can send them to /dev/null.  With
Spamassassin they go to my spam folder for review.


-Ken




Re: [OT] Vim

2002-08-26 Thread Kai Weber

+ Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Yeah, but with procmail I can send them to /dev/null.  With
 Spamassassin they go to my spam folder for review.

You can use procmail to filter the spamassasin'ated mails to /dev/null,
too.

| :0
| * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
| /dev/null

Kai



Re: [OT] Vim

2002-08-26 Thread Ken Weingold

On Mon, Aug 26, 2002, Kai Weber wrote:
 + Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
  Yeah, but with procmail I can send them to /dev/null.  With
  Spamassassin they go to my spam folder for review.
 
 You can use procmail to filter the spamassasin'ated mails to /dev/null,
 too.

I would never do that.  Sometimes Spamassassin catches real mail as
spam.


-Ken




Re: [OT] Vim

2002-08-26 Thread David Champion

* On 2002.08.26, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
*   Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I would never do that.  Sometimes Spamassassin catches real mail as
 spam.

If I could be so lucky. Sometimes. Heh.

-- 
 -D.We establised a fine coffee. What everybody can say
 Sun Project, APC/UCCO  TASTY! It's fresh, so-mild, with some special coffee's
 University of Chicago  bitter and sourtaste. LET'S HAVE SUCH A COFFEE! NOW!
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Please love CAFE MIAMI. Many thanks.



Re: [OT] Vim

2002-08-26 Thread Michael Leone


David Champion said:
 * On 2002.08.26, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
 * Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I would never do that.  Sometimes Spamassassin catches real mail as
 spam.

 If I could be so lucky. Sometimes. Heh.

it's been my experience that the latest SA (v2.31) is much better at 
distinguishing real mail from spam than earlier version. And v2.40 is due
Really Really Soon Now, they say.

-- 
PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
Member, LEAF Project http://leaf.sourceforge.netAIM: MikeLeone
Public Key - http://www.mike-leone.com/~turgon/turgon-public-key.asc

Some days you're the pigeon; some days you're the statue.




Random Thought:
--