les.
> >
> > But, I had discovered that the "From: " line was incomplete. It was:
> >
> > brown@mrvideo
>
> On Solaris, the hostname(1) command (and maybe even the uname(2)
> syscall, I do not remember anymore) return the FQDN, unlike Linux, where
>
On 2018-01-14 01:27, Mike Brown wrote:
> I was running exim and mutt on an old Solaris system. I finally moved
> over to my new Linux box, which is now at Fedora 27. I copied over
> the config files.
>
> But, I had discovered that the "From: " line was incomplete.
Mutt version: Mutt 1.9.1
Exim version: 4.89 #1 built 01-Dec-2017 12:50:23
I was running exim and mutt on an old Solaris system. I finally moved over
to my new Linux box, which is now at Fedora 27. I copied over the config
files.
But, I had discovered that the "From: " line was
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 19:21, Prahlad Vaidyanathan wrote:
Why do these lines starting with From keep turning up in the body.
All lines beginning with the word From seem to end up like this. Some
MTA/MDA along the way seems to be doing this. It isn't my procmail (at
least nothing I've
* Steffen Evers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 19:21, Prahlad Vaidyanathan wrote:
Why do these lines starting with From keep turning up in the body.
All lines beginning with the word From seem to end up like this. Some
MTA/MDA along the way seems to be doing this. It
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 09:05:37AM -0800, Carl B. Constantine wrote:
Wrong. It's actually part of one of the internet RFC's. MUTT is not the
only client that does this. All E-mail programs place a quoted symbol
'' for most people by the word From if it's the first word in a
paragraph.
Going
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 09:05, Carl B. Constantine wrote:
* Steffen Evers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
It IS caused by procmail in combination with your MTA normally. It is
the default behavior for procmail to do this, so you do not need to set
this explicitly. Have a look at this:
Philip, et al --
...and then Philip Mak said...
%
% On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 09:05:37AM -0800, Carl B. Constantine wrote:
% Wrong. It's actually part of one of the internet RFC's. MUTT is not the
% only client that does this. All E-mail programs place a quoted symbol
% '' for most people by
Carl == Carl B Constantine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Carl Wrong. It's actually part of one of the internet RFC's.
*sigh* No, it isn't. RFCs define on-the-wire protocols to be used when
communicating on the Internet. Appending a '' to a 'From ' header is
something done to a local file
Hi,
Why do these lines starting with From keep turning up in the body.
All lines beginning with the word From seem to end up like this. Some
MTA/MDA along the way seems to be doing this. It isn't my procmail (at
least nothing I've defined), so what does this ?
More importantly, how do I get rid
Prahlad == Prahlad Vaidyanathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Prahlad Hi, Why do these lines starting with From keep turning
Prahlad up in the body. All lines beginning with the word From
Prahlad seem to end up like this. Some MTA/MDA along the way seems
Prahlad to be doing this.
Cliff, et al --
...and then Cliff Sarginson said...
%
% On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 10:53:39PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
%
% ...and then Philip Mak said...
% %
% % Is it possible to see the SMTP MAIL FROM line of a message in my
...
% If you mean the ^From_ line that looks about like
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, David T-G wrote:
But it's used for message information, no? It becomes the ^From: line,
or at least so it appears. That's why it's so easy to fake and so on,
too, but it looks like whatever is put there would show up in the header.
It's not the ^From: line. For example
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 05:24:57AM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
I think he means the MAIL FROM that is part of the SMTP dialog that
goes on between MTA's.
If so my mail server puts it as part of the Received header like so:
Received: from ns.gbnet.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [194.70.126.10])
Ben, et al --
...and then Ben Reser said...
%
% On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 05:24:57AM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
% I think he means the MAIL FROM that is part of the SMTP dialog that
% goes on between MTA's.
%
% If so my mail server puts it as part of the Received header like so:
% Received:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 07:16:10AM -0500, Philip Mak wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, David T-G wrote:
But it's used for message information, no? It becomes the ^From: line,
or at least so it appears. That's why it's so easy to fake and so on,
too, but it looks like whatever is put
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 07:47:14AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
Are you sure that's not the RCPT TO: part?
Your right. This is what happens when I post late at night. :)
--
Ben Reser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ben.reser.org
I wish it need not have happened in my time, said Frodo.
So do I, said
Is it possible to see the SMTP MAIL FROM line of a message in my
mailbox, or does Maildir format strip that information out before storing
it?
Philip --
Hey, what are you doing still using PINE??!
...and then Philip Mak said...
%
% Is it possible to see the SMTP MAIL FROM line of a message in my
% mailbox, or does Maildir format strip that information out before storing
% it?
If you mean the ^From_ line that looks about like
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 10:53:39PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
Philip --
Hey, what are you doing still using PINE??!
...and then Philip Mak said...
%
% Is it possible to see the SMTP MAIL FROM line of a message in my
% mailbox, or does Maildir format strip that information out before
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 05:29:03PM -0700, Nathan Saper wrote:
Is it possible to use the "subscribe" command, but still have the author's
name appear in the message index, instead of the name of the mailing list?
You just need to change your index_format appropriately, either
permanently, or
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 10:55:04PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 01:25:23AM -0600, Timothy Legant wrote:
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 05:29:03PM -0700, Nathan Saper wrote:
Is it possible to use the "subscribe" command, but still have the author's
name appear in the
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 05:29:03PM -0700, Nathan Saper wrote:
Is it possible to use the "subscribe" command, but still have the author's
name appear in the message index, instead of the name of the mailing list?
I use %F to accomplish this in all my "subscribe"d mailboxes.
-thl
PGP
David Alban [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 08 Nov 2000:
Sure does. Interesting. I didn't think the "^From " line *was* a
header. :-)
Technically it isn't, it's part of the mbox folder format... But I
guess Mutt does treat it that way, if it's present.
The "^From "
h you seem to be using).
Sure does. Interesting. I didn't think the "^From " line *was* a
header. :-)
I think having envelope addresses in the mail headers is not what you
want since you would also see the Bcc: information etc?
I though the "From " is filled in by the out
that this matching is based on the "From: " header, not the
"^From " line that indicates a new message in the mbox mail folder
format.
Someone set up a majordomo list so that none of the headers identify
the list. So *only* the "^From " line identifies the list to w
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 10:40:28AM -0800, David Alban
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
[snip]
The mutt manual says:
~B EXPR messages which contain EXPR in the whole message
If you use the mbox format, there should be one and only one "^From "
line in any messag
At 2000/11/08/20:18 -0500 Jim Toth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
save-hook '~h "^From some-list-owner@"' =some-list
(where ~h is in the headers somewhere) should also work, although I
don't know if it works on 0.95 (which you seem to be using).
Sure does. Interesting. I didn't think
Hi,
This is probably answered somewhere but I can't seem to
find it in Mutt's documentation. A simple situation, I
have continuum.cm.nu which accepts mail for cm.nu. Thus my
email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mutt will send this fine but
the From header says:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
From:
Shane Wegner proclaimed on mutt-users that:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I seem to be able to set how Mutt handles the `From:'
header but not the `From' header. Is setting this
set envelope_from
in older mutts, set sendmail=/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -oem -f [EMAIL
Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Shane Wegner proclaimed on mutt-users that:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I seem to be able to set how Mutt handles the `From:'
header but not the `From' header. Is setting this
set envelope_from
or
set hostname
the time too.
Let me explain. My From: line shows Kai Blin [EMAIL PROTECTED],
but my local address is my_username@my_hostname. That works, too, but my
mail is beeing delivered to a central mail server un the campus. So I have
this From: line to point to another mail account.
Btw, how come some
ers domain name. I am subscribed to several mailing
lists, and I have never seen this happen when looking at messages that
I have sent. I also tried sending an e-mail to my account at my
university, and that message had the correct From: line. Who is to
blame here? Is my setup incorrect, or w
*[André Dahlqvist on Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 04:41:53PM +0200]:
what was wrong? When composing a message in Mutt I can see that the
from line just has "andre" there, and not my domain name. Changing
use_domain to yes also changes this, but I don't know if that's how it
my_hdr Fr
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 08:40:59PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andre' Dahlqvist)
set envelope_from
But in what cases should one have to use that? I mean what I'm using
now seams to work almost all the time too.
Btw, how come some people prefer to
*[André Dahlqvist on Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 06:55:05PM +0200]:
my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andre' Dahlqvist)
set envelope_from
But in what cases should one have to use that? I mean what I'm using
now seams to work almost all the time too.
You'd set the envelope sender when you were
*[André Dahlqvist on Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 06:55:05PM +0200]:
Btw, how come some people prefer to write the name inside parenthesis
like that, and some prefer to have the address inside and the name
before it?
Oh, and another thing
Received: from 1cust62.tnt12.stk3.da.uu.net (HELO
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 10:40:31PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
You seem to be posting directly from your debian box on a uunet
dialup - I suggest you check out http://www.mail-abuse.org/dul for
why this is A Bad Thing (tm). Set Exim to relay all mails through
uunet's mailserver
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 10:34:32PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
What you were doing is more like mail from: foo - some servers
tolerate that and append their own domain name to it - others bounce
the mail.
But when I have tried sending mails to other accounts the From: line
has been
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 10:34:32PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
What you were doing is more like mail from: foo - some servers tolerate that
and append their own domain name to it - others bounce the mail.
I forgot to ask you, should I have use_domain set? I'm on dialup.
--
// André
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 10:40:31PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
You seem to be posting directly from your debian box on a uunet dialup - I
suggest you check out http://www.mail-abuse.org/dul for why this is A Bad Thing
(tm). Set Exim to relay all mails through uunet's mailserver
*[André Dahlqvist on Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 07:26:44PM +0200]:
I forgot to ask you, should I have use_domain set? I'm on dialup.
set hostname="beta.telenordia.se"
I don't use use_domain - just set envelope_from
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
mallet @ cluestick.org
*[Daniel J Peng on Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 11:53:39PM -0400]:
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 10:40:31PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
You seem to be posting directly from your debian box on a uunet dialup - I
suggest you check out http://www.mail-abuse.org/dul for why this is A Bad
I have
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 11:53:39PM -0400, Daniel J Peng wrote:
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 10:40:31PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
You seem to be posting directly from your debian box on a uunet dialup - I
suggest you check out http://www.mail-abuse.org/dul for why this is A Bad Thing
On 1999-11-26 19:45:37 +, Andreas Wessel wrote:
But how can I change the default user in front of the @?
I can't work with something like
send-hook . unmy_hdr From:
send-hook . my_hdr From: Andreas Wessel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
because this way I can't use my reverse_name setting
John Poltorak [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Where does mutt get information to format the From: line?
Is it the environment or .muttrc?
Yes. It comes from several places... the hostname comes from
/etc/resolv.conf, unless overridden by $hostname. $hidden_host comes into
play, as do $alternates
On Wed, Oct 20, 1999 at 01:37:29PM +0100, John Poltorak wrote:
Where does mutt get information to format the From: line?
Is it the environment or .muttrc?
.muttrc
I'd like to change it so that it puts jpolt@ instead of john@
in that line, but I don't know how.
my_hdr From: John Poltorak
On Sat, Jun 19, 1999 at 05:29:50AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
set reply_to=ask-yes (or something)
[snip]
group-reply will go to everyone in the To: and Cc: fields unless there is
On a somewhat related subject (well, related to these two bits, anyways),
is there a feature in Mutt (that I've
Hello!
I use procmail to sort a mailingliste I´m subscribed to into a special
folder.
This mailinglist is the only one I´m subscribed to that uses a
Reply-To: mailinglist-address header.
So far I could just press "r" to answer to this group, but I don´t
want this, because "r" should be a
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=4f28nU6agdXSinmL; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
On Sat, Jun 19, 1999 at 11:51:35AM +0200, Alexander Langer wrote:
Pressing "g" should use the reply-to header, but *not* CC: other
adresses, e.g. the author´s one.
People on this list ask me twice a month not to double-send emails :)
Actually mutt has some special features for handling
51 matches
Mail list logo
