On Mon, Aug 09, 1999 at 10:34:30PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
On 1999-08-09 12:43:07 -0700, rex wrote:
I don't mind -- too much -- having to spend a couple of hours
reading enough about procmail
A couple of hours? In doc/pgp-notes.txt, there is a recipe readily
available for cut
On 1999-08-09 12:43:07 -0700, rex wrote:
I don't mind -- too much -- having to spend a couple of hours
reading enough about procmail
A couple of hours? In doc/pgp-notes.txt, there is a recipe readily
available for cut paste.
to get it working, because it's a useful program for other
On 1999-08-09 15:22:07 -0700, rex wrote:
- When your mail user agent doesn't support PGP, it has no decent
access to the signed text. Not very nice.
But I don't understand this. The signature is just part of the
message and doesn't interfere with reading the signed part of the
message
rex [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
On Sun, Aug 08, 1999 at 10:42:36PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
Shao Zhang [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
But, what about outgoing messages? If I pgp sign a mail to a friend
who is using pine as his MUA. When he views the attachment, pine will
complain it is an
On 1999-08-09 02:34:31 -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
IMO, Mutt is following an elitist path on this issue
which is hurting Mutt and the PGP user community. Let's face it, PGP
is far more important to freedom than Mutt, and intentionally making
PGP harder to use is a serious mistake.
Who
On Sun, Aug 08, 1999 at 11:38:32PM -0700, rex wrote:
On Sun, Aug 08, 1999 at 10:42:36PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
This is technically a bug in pine. If Mutt repeats this bug, we don't make
any progress. People using pine should bug the developers to fix it if
they care about it.
On 1999-08-08 23:38:32 -0700, rex wrote:
Why do you call a convention that was in use worldwide for several
years and perfectly functional, a bug?
While it's not an actual bug, it's _not_ perfectly functional.
There are several issues with traditional cleartext PGP signatures:
- When your
On Mon, Aug 09, 1999 at 12:18:17PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
On 1999-08-08 23:38:32 -0700, rex wrote:
Why do you call a convention that was in use worldwide for several
years and perfectly functional, a bug?
While it's not an actual bug, it's _not_ perfectly functional.
There are
Shao Zhang [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Jeremy Blosser [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
The best way to handle this is to educate people as to why the old way is
bad and push them to push the people who make their MUA to fix it.
Agreed.
This guy's problem sounds like not realizing that he can
On Sun, Aug 08, 1999 at 10:42:36PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
Shao Zhang [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
But, what about outgoing messages? If I pgp sign a mail to a friend
who is using pine as his MUA. When he views the attachment, pine will
complain it is an unknown attachment and will ask
10 matches
Mail list logo
