Re: New mail folder list

2008-09-24 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2008-09-04 13:10:02, schrieb Rado S: It is so even when you don't read _any_ (not even new) mail in that folder. Merely opening the folder sets a flag. I don't know whether that's a mutt or IMAP feature, but it's a feature rather than a bug. It seems, that the programs are reading

Re: New mail folder list

2008-09-24 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Michelle Konzack wrote: Am 2008-09-04 13:10:02, schrieb Rado S: It is so even when you don't read _any_ (not even new) mail in that folder. Merely opening the folder sets a flag. I don't know whether that's a mutt or IMAP feature, but it's a feature rather than a bug. It seems, that

Re: New mail folder list

2008-09-24 Thread Mark Harrison
It seems, that the programs are reading /folder/new/ and if you access a Maildirfolder over IMAP, the server (in my case courier) move the messages to /folder/cur/ which let buffy thinking, they are now read. This is definitively a BUG in the biff/buffy apps or they can handel

Re: New mail folder list

2008-09-15 Thread Vladimir Marek
I'm attaching another way to fix this. It makes mark_old option work also for IMAP. IMAP mark_old patch [...] Have you created a ticket for that patch at dev.mutt.org/trac? No. Brendan had his doubts about this being correct thing to do. I vaguely remember he wanted me to try

Re: New mail folder list

2008-09-15 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Vladimir Marek wrote: No. Brendan had his doubts about this being correct thing to do. I vaguely remember he wanted me to try mark_old with pop type mailboxes also. With POP3 and hcache plus bcache, mutt has limited support for simulating message flags, see the comments in the code:

Re: New mail folder list

2008-09-14 Thread Christian Brabandt
Hi Vladimir! On Sat, 13 Sep 2008, Vladimir Marek wrote: I'm attaching another way to fix this. It makes mark_old option work also for IMAP. IMAP mark_old patch [...] Have you created a ticket for that patch at dev.mutt.org/trac? regards, Christian -- Citizens are not allowed to

Re: New mail folder list

2008-09-13 Thread Vladimir Marek
Hi, I'm sorry I noticed this thread after you walked through the code ... Index: mutt-1.5.18/imap/command.c === --- mutt-1.5.18.orig/imap/command.c 2008-09-09 00:17:25.0 -0400 +++ mutt-1.5.18/imap/command.c

Re: New mail folder list

2008-09-13 Thread Mark Harrison
I'm attaching another way to fix this. It makes mark_old option work also for IMAP. Thank you. That patch works perfectly, and removes the need for yet another option to be created (which was what I was going to try to do next). Mark -- Mark Harrison Systems Administrator OmniTI Computer

Re: New mail folder list

2008-09-12 Thread Mark Harrison
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 01:11:24PM -0400, Mark Harrison wrote: It is so even when you don't read _any_ (not even new) mail in that folder. Merely opening the folder sets a flag. I don't know whether that's a mutt or IMAP feature, but it's a feature rather than a bug. I looked at this

Re: New mail folder list

2008-09-04 Thread Rado S
=- Mark Harrison wrote on Wed 3.Sep'08 at 22:45:13 -0400 -= I have mail being delivered to several folders in an imap account, {...} However, when I change to a folder with new mail, that folder is removed from the buffy list, and remains that way even if I leave the folder without reading

New mail folder list

2008-09-03 Thread Mark Harrison
Hi all, I have mail being delivered to several folders in an imap account, and each folder included as part of a mailbox command. I am notified of new mail in the folders, the buffy-list command shows all folders with new mail, and the folders cycle through when I press c, then space. However,