On 1999-10-27 11:32:54 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
On 1999-10-27 08:51:22 +0100, Chris Green wrote:
Since most people on this list presumably use mutt would it be too
much to ask that they use the 'L' command to respond to mail on the
list. Many of the responses to my recent questions
On 1999-10-27 12:20:29 +0100, Chris Green wrote:
I think it should be set to do so, I looked up in the manual and it
says the default for 'followup_to' is 'set'. I have this list set up
as a list in my .muttrc file, so as I understand it, I should already
be setting Mail-Followup-To:
On Wed, Oct 27, 1999 at 01:30:27PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
You're using the unstable branch. That means that, in order to get
mail-followup-to set, you have to add the list to the list of
subscribed lists. See muttrc (5).
Is this something in addition to the 'lists' command in my
. So what now?
But it does... unless you mean somewhere else:
X-From_: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 27 22:42:39 1999
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 13:40:35 +0100
From: Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Please use the 'L' command to send mail
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 13:40:35 +0100
From: Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Please use the 'L' command to send mail
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt
Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 27 Oct 1999:
Oops, yes I've found it, thanks! This message should have the
'Mail-followup-to:', but it *still* hasn't and I do have mutt in the
'subscribe' list in my .muttrc file. So what now?
It did (as was pointed out). I'm only adding the
Chris Green writes:
Since most people on this list presumably use mutt would it be too
much to ask that they use the 'L' command to respond to mail on the
list. Many of the responses to my recent questions and comments have
been sent to both the list and to me. It's no big deal but it would
] wrote:
* Um, it does, you know:
*
* Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 13:40:35 +0100
* From: Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject: Re: Please use the 'L' command to send mail
* Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Mime-Version: 1.0
A quick fix on your end, assuming you're also running procmail (a good
assumption on this mailing list),
Add the following to the front of your .procmailrc file:
:0 Wh: msgid.lock
| formail -D 8192 msgid.cache
This discards duplicate mails based upon the message ID header.
While
Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 27 Oct 1999:
However it didn't show
up when I did an 'E', does that only show my wanted headers as opposed
to all of them, I suppose that must be it.
No, I think you don't see it in "E" is because it's not there yet.
It gets added when the email
Carrie Jamrogowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 27 Oct 1999:
Is there a way to get the message index to show the author's name instead
of the list name?
The default $index_format is "%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15L (%4l) %s"
Change the %-15.15L to %-15.15F (or possibly lower-case f, if you
Lars Hecking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 27 Oct 1999:
While this recipe is on the procmailex man page, a recipe to
save duplicates into a different folder is a lot safer (like
the one further down in procmailex(5)).
There's also some specialised scripts/programs (made with perl) that
12 matches
Mail list logo
