Re: Q: Why no replies to my post??

2000-09-27 Thread David Champion
On 2000.09.27, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Byrial Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 09:08:23 -0500, David Champion wrote: > > Me, too. I take a different approach: I have a short wrapper script > > that I use for invoking mutt. It sets LANG, then returns LC_COLLAT

Re: Q: Why no replies to my post??

2000-09-27 Thread Byrial Jensen
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 09:08:23 -0500, David Champion wrote: > Me, too. I take a different approach: I have a short wrapper script > that I use for invoking mutt. It sets LANG, then returns LC_COLLATE to > C so that sorting works correctly. :) Mutt disregards the setting of LC_COLLATE and alwa

Re: Q: Why no replies to my post??

2000-09-26 Thread Anton Graham
Submitted 26-Sep-00 by Dave Ewart: > Can you post a "mutt -v" of both a working and a non-working build? Or > are they definitely the same? I no longer have the broken 1.3.7 rpm, but I haven't changed any configuration options in my spec file since 1.3.5. This is mutt -v on my 1.3.8 build: Mut

Re: Q: Why no replies to my post??

2000-09-26 Thread David Champion
On 2000.09.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Lars Hecking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Example: in general, I prefer a C locale, but occasionally I do need > certain non-ascii characters. So here's what I am using: > > $ grep LC_ ~/.muttrc > set editor="LC_CTYPE=en_IE.ISO8859-15 vi" > se

Re: Q: Why no replies to my post??

2000-09-26 Thread Benjamin Korvemaker
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 09:38:49AM +0100, Dave Ewart wrote: [..] > I'd appreciate any insights as to why my posting got no response! [..] I seem to recall I grumbled about a similar thing awhile back (also development series), and nothing anyone suggested worked for me. So I suffer through it whe

Re: Q: Why no replies to my post??

2000-09-26 Thread Dave Ewart
On Tuesday, 26.09.2000 at 16:11 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: > On 2000-09-26 14:48:35 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote: > > > I think my problem is with the Mutt internal pager not displaying stuff > > right, since all other aspects involve using the editor Vim, and > > characters display correctly. Yo

Re: Q: Why no replies to my post??

2000-09-26 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2000-09-26 14:48:35 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote: > I think my problem is with the Mutt internal pager not displaying stuff > right, since all other aspects involve using the editor Vim, and > characters display correctly. Your external pager will mean that the > internal pager is never used. > G

Re: Q: Why no replies to my post??

2000-09-26 Thread Dave Pearson
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 02:46:21PM +0100, Dave Ewart wrote: > My feeling is that quite a large > number of people _are_ using the development versions, though ... Just because many people use a development version it doesn't follow that they don't report

Re: Q: Why no replies to my post??

2000-09-26 Thread Dave Ewart
On Tuesday, 26.09.2000 at 11:34 +0100, Lars Hecking wrote: > Dave Ewart writes: > > On Tuesday, 26.09.2000 at 11:01 +0100, Lars Hecking wrote: > > > > > > e.g. the UK pound sign, £ (don't know how that'll appear for > > > > most of you) appears as \243 (that's backslash, 2, 4, 3). > > > > > >

Re: Q: Why no replies to my post??

2000-09-26 Thread Dave Ewart
On Tuesday, 26.09.2000 at 13:08 +0200, Byrial Jensen wrote: > On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 09:38:49 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote: > > I'd appreciate any insights as to why my posting got no response! > > Well, one of the reasons could be that you post about problems with > Mutt 1.3.x here at the mutt-user

Re: Q: Why no replies to my post??

2000-09-26 Thread Byrial Jensen
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 09:38:49 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote: > I'd appreciate any insights as to why my posting got no response! Well, one of the reasons could be that you post about problems with Mutt 1.3.x here at the mutt-users list. The 1.3.x series are development versions which are not conside

Re: Q: Why no replies to my post??

2000-09-26 Thread Lars Hecking
Dave Ewart writes: > On Tuesday, 26.09.2000 at 11:01 +0100, Lars Hecking wrote: > > > > e.g. the UK pound sign, £ (don't know how that'll appear for most of > > > you) appears as \243 (that's backslash, 2, 4, 3). > > > > Set your locale properly. If that doesn't help, compile with > > --enable

Re: Q: Why no replies to my post??

2000-09-26 Thread Dave Ewart
On Tuesday, 26.09.2000 at 11:01 +0100, Lars Hecking wrote: > > e.g. the UK pound sign, £ (don't know how that'll appear for most of > > you) appears as \243 (that's backslash, 2, 4, 3). > > Set your locale properly. If that doesn't help, compile with > --enable-locales-fix. Thanks for the sug

Re: Q: Why no replies to my post??

2000-09-26 Thread Lars Hecking
> e.g. the UK pound sign, £ (don't know how that'll appear for most of > you) appears as \243 (that's backslash, 2, 4, 3). Set your locale properly. If that doesn't help, compile with --enable-locales-fix.

Re: Q: Why no replies to my post??

2000-09-26 Thread Dave Ewart
On Tuesday, 26.09.2000 at 02:31 -0700, Anton Graham wrote: > Submitted 26-Sep-00 by Dave Ewart: > > I find it hard to believe that either of those explanations is true. > > It hits me intermittently, yes on some builds, not on others. So I > don't have a guaranteed fix. I can't even tell you w

Re: Q: Why no replies to my post??

2000-09-26 Thread Anton Graham
Submitted 26-Sep-00 by Dave Ewart: > I find it hard to believe that either of those explanations is true. It hits me intermittently, yes on some builds, not on others. So I don't have a guaranteed fix. I can't even tell you what makes it happen, since I use the same options for every build (I b

Re: Q: Why no replies to my post??

2000-09-26 Thread Dave Ewart
On Tuesday, 26.09.2000 at 20:13 +1100, raf wrote: > Dave Ewart wrote: > > > I posted this question yesterday and have had no replies or > > follow-ups. Does that mean that no-one else has this problem? Or > > that loads of people have the problem and they can't solve it > > either?? I find it

Re: Q: Why no replies to my post??

2000-09-26 Thread raf
Dave Ewart wrote: > I posted this question yesterday and have had no replies or follow-ups. > Does that mean that no-one else has this problem? Or that loads of > people have the problem and they can't solve it either?? I find it hard > to believe that either of those explanations is true. > >

Q: Why no replies to my post??

2000-09-26 Thread Dave Ewart
I posted this question yesterday and have had no replies or follow-ups. Does that mean that no-one else has this problem? Or that loads of people have the problem and they can't solve it either?? I find it hard to believe that either of those explanations is true. I'd appreciate any insights as