On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 01:41:55PM +, Martin Orwin wrote:
I understand your concerns about this but I don't think you'll find it a
problem in the long run. I occasionally hit the wrong key and there is
always a way of undoing what I've done (aside from saying 'no' when Mutt
actually
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 01:31:14AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 01:41:55PM +, Martin Orwin wrote:
I understand your concerns about this but I don't think you'll find it a
problem in the long run. I occasionally hit the wrong key and there is
always a way of
* On 25 Nov 2013, Martin Vegter wrote:
I would like to unbind all key bindings, so that I can explicitly define
only those, that I am actually going to use.
While googling, I have discovered that I am not the only one having this
problem. There even seems to be a patch called unbind
will perform some
action without knowing what happened.
I have very simple requirements from my email client. I don't need two
separate key binding for next-entry and next-undeleted, for example.
I would like to unbind all key bindings, so that I can explicitly define
only those, that I am actually
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:09:37AM +0100, Martin Vegter wrote:
I have found the following in the manual:
bindindex j noop
bindindex k noop
the problem with this approach is, that I have to unbind every
single key-binding explicitly.
It makes no
I understand your concerns about this but I don't think you'll find it a
problem in the long run. I occasionally hit the wrong key and there is always
a way of undoing what I've done (aside from saying 'no' when Mutt actually asks
me if I really want to do something, which personally I like).
Whatever you choose to do, once you get used to it, it's the best email
client out there ...
Of the various mail user agents I have investigated, only mutt
and gnus offer good efficiency in the handling of a large volume of
messages. Not coincidentally, neither mutt nor gnus makes use
of the
my email client. I don't need two
separate key binding for next-entry and next-undeleted, for example.
I would like to unbind all key bindings, so that I can explicitly define
only those, that I am actually going to use.
While googling, I have discovered that I am not the only one having
happened.
I have very simple requirements from my email client. I don't need two
separate key binding for next-entry and next-undeleted, for example.
I would like to unbind all key bindings, so that I can explicitly define
only those, that I am actually going to use.
While googling, I
I know this is probably a longshot (I looked through the archives
already and found nothing.)
Is there a way to unbind all keys with one, or a small series, of
commands? I'm trying to set mutt up so that the only commands bound are
ones that I explicitly set. I'm tired of tpyoing a key
On 2001.02.22, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Jay Rossiter / Signe" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to unbind all keys with one, or a small series, of
commands? I'm trying to set mutt up so that the only commands bound are
ones that I explicitly set. I'm tired of tpy
On 02/22, David Champion rearranged the electrons to read:
On 2001.02.22, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Jay Rossiter / Signe" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to unbind all keys with one, or a small series, of
commands? I'm trying to set mutt up so that the only comm
12 matches
Mail list logo
