Re: "User-Agent:" or "X-Mailer:" ??

1999-09-03 Thread Thomas Roessler
In addition, it's pure cosmetics. On 1999-09-03 14:40:36 -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote: > Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 14:40:36 -0500 > From: Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: "User-Agent:" or "X-Mailer:" ?? > Mail-Foll

Re: "User-Agent:" or "X-Mailer:" ??

1999-09-03 Thread Jeremy Blosser
Russell Hoover [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > What determines which of these two headers is displayed automatically? I *believe* at this point it's an unstable vs stable version thing. If you've seen 0.96. with X-Mailer, I would guess it was locally patched. -- Jeremy Blosser | [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: "User-Agent:" or "X-Mailer:" ??

1999-09-03 Thread Russell Hoover
On Fri 09/03/99 at 02:14 PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What are you talking about? > > The sender uses "my_hdr" or "edit_hdrs" to add/edit arbitrary headers. > The recipient can use "ignore" and "unignore" to hide/display the headers. Yes. Of course. I probably shoul

Re: "User-Agent:" or "X-Mailer:" ??

1999-09-03 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 07:55:49AM -0400, Russell Hoover wrote: > What determines which of these two headers is displayed automatically? > > ("automatically" as opposed to being displayed because you've created > one or the other as a user-defined "my_hdr" in the muttrc.) > What are you talkin

"User-Agent:" or "X-Mailer:" ??

1999-09-03 Thread Russell Hoover
What determines which of these two headers is displayed automatically? ("automatically" as opposed to being displayed because you've created one or the other as a user-defined "my_hdr" in the muttrc.)