Re: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter
On 2002-01-01 10:03 +, Benjamin Smith wrote: On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 01:36:03PM +0100, Andre Majorel wrote: On 2001-12-28 18:22 +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: I thought that message-hook ~f joe@blow\.com pipe-message /usr/local/bin/unmangle would do the trick but Mutt says pipe-message: unknown command. It's pipe-message (incl. the angle brackets) isn't it? I've tried that too and Mutt doesn't like it either. If you're trying to call a function you need to push or exec it onto the keyboard buffer ie. message-hook ~f joe@blow\.com push 'pipe-message/usr/local/bin/unmangleReturn' (untested) When hitting [return] on one of joe's messages, Mutt displays the message with more(1) or some other pager, displays press any key to continue and displays it again ad nauseam. or message-hook ~f joe@blow\.com exec pipe-message /usr/local/bin/unmangle (untested) When hitting [return] on one of joe's messages, Mutt pauses for one second and then displays the message normally (*without* filtering it). Obviously, I don't understand pipe-message. Thanks, folks. -- André Majorel URL:http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/ std::disclaimer (Not speaking for my employer);
Re: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter
(Neat feature: tagged reply) On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 01:36:03PM +0100, Andre Majorel wrote: On 2001-12-28 18:22 +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: I thought that message-hook ~f joe@blow\.com pipe-message /usr/local/bin/unmangle would do the trick but Mutt says pipe-message: unknown command. It's pipe-message (incl. the angle brackets) isn't it? I've tried that too and Mutt doesn't like it either. If you're trying to call a function you need to push or exec it onto the keyboard buffer ie. message-hook ~f joe@blow\.com push 'pipe-message/usr/local/bin/unmangleReturn' (untested) or message-hook ~f joe@blow\.com exec pipe-message /usr/local/bin/unmangle (untested) Although the method I use is in the next message as works 100%: On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 01:37:39PM +0100, Andre Majorel wrote: On 2001-12-28 17:15 +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 05:09:05PM +0100, Andre Majorel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought that message-hook ~f joe@blow\.com pipe-message /usr/local/bin/unmangle would do the trick but Mutt says pipe-message: unknown command. I would try message-hook . unset display_filter message-hook ~f joe@blow\.com set display_filter=/usr/local/bin/unmangle but this is untested. Thanks, this works fine, at least for the viewing part of the deal. I guess we need a reply_filter variable. -- Benjamin Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] msg22068/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter
On 2001-12-28 11:19 -0500, Dan Boger wrote: On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 05:09:05PM +0100, Andre Majorel wrote: There is one guy out there who has particular and very annoying writing idiosyncracies (think Prince or B1FF). I wrote a filter to translate his prose to something less obnoxious. Now how do I configure Mutt to automatically pipe his messages through the filter when reading or replying to him ? I thought that message-hook ~f joe@blow\.com pipe-message /usr/local/bin/unmangle would do the trick but Mutt says pipe-message: unknown command. well, not sure how to do it with mutt - I have written a similar filter (for a 40 year old that spells like he's a teenage hacker wannabe), and I just run it via procmail... It is funny to see my replies to him spelled correctly (including the quoted part :) Neat idea, although changing the message that early is a bit radical, even for me. :-) -- André Majorel [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/
Re: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter
On 2001-12-28 18:22 +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: I thought that message-hook ~f joe@blow\.com pipe-message /usr/local/bin/unmangle would do the trick but Mutt says pipe-message: unknown command. It's pipe-message (incl. the angle brackets) isn't it? I've tried that too and Mutt doesn't like it either. -- André Majorel [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/
Re: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter
On 2001-12-28 17:15 +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 05:09:05PM +0100, Andre Majorel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought that message-hook ~f joe@blow\.com pipe-message /usr/local/bin/unmangle would do the trick but Mutt says pipe-message: unknown command. I would try message-hook . unset display_filter message-hook ~f joe@blow\.com set display_filter=/usr/local/bin/unmangle but this is untested. Thanks, this works fine, at least for the viewing part of the deal. I guess we need a reply_filter variable. -- André Majorel [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/
Re: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter
Andre Dan -- ...and then Andre Majorel said... % % There is one guy out there who has particular and very annoying % writing idiosyncracies (think Prince or B1FF). I wrote a filter to ... ...and then Dan Boger said... % % well, not sure how to do it with mutt - I have written a similar filter % (for a 40 year old that spells like he's a teenage hacker wannabe), and ... These sound great. Care to post them? Happy Holidays to all :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg22020/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Using message-hook to run messages through a filter
There is one guy out there who has particular and very annoying writing idiosyncracies (think Prince or B1FF). I wrote a filter to translate his prose to something less obnoxious. Now how do I configure Mutt to automatically pipe his messages through the filter when reading or replying to him ? I thought that message-hook ~f joe@blow\.com pipe-message /usr/local/bin/unmangle would do the trick but Mutt says pipe-message: unknown command. -- André Majorel URL:http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/ std::disclaimer (Not speaking for my employer);
Re: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 05:09:05PM +0100, Andre Majorel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought that message-hook ~f joe@blow\.com pipe-message /usr/local/bin/unmangle would do the trick but Mutt says pipe-message: unknown command. I would try message-hook . unset display_filter message-hook ~f joe@blow\.com set display_filter=/usr/local/bin/unmangle but this is untested. Nicolas
Re: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 05:09:05PM +0100, Andre Majorel wrote: There is one guy out there who has particular and very annoying writing idiosyncracies (think Prince or B1FF). I wrote a filter to translate his prose to something less obnoxious. Now how do I configure Mutt to automatically pipe his messages through the filter when reading or replying to him ? I thought that message-hook ~f joe@blow\.com pipe-message /usr/local/bin/unmangle would do the trick but Mutt says pipe-message: unknown command. well, not sure how to do it with mutt - I have written a similar filter (for a 40 year old that spells like he's a teenage hacker wannabe), and I just run it via procmail... It is funny to see my replies to him spelled correctly (including the quoted part :) HTH Dan -- Dan Boger [EMAIL PROTECTED] msg21980/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 17:09:05 +0100 From: Andre Majorel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter There is one guy out there who has particular and very annoying writing idiosyncracies (think Prince or B1FF). I wrote a filter to translate his prose to something less obnoxious. Now how do I configure Mutt to automatically pipe his messages through the filter when reading or replying to him ? I thought that message-hook ~f joe@blow\.com pipe-message /usr/local/bin/unmangle would do the trick but Mutt says pipe-message: unknown command. It's pipe-message (incl. the angle brackets) isn't it? -- FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE 6:21PM up 2 days, 4:59, 11 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00
