Re: build problems on Solaris 8

2013-02-09 Thread John Long
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 04:46:28PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote: On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 05:30:03PM -0700, s. keeling wrote: Incoming from Michael Elkins: FYI, there are nightly snapshots here http://dev.mutt.org/nightlies/ which avoid the need to have the developer toolchain installed.

build problems on Solaris 8

2013-02-08 Thread Will Yardley
I'm trying to build mutt with gcc 3.2.3 on an old Solaris 8 box. I'm building with: --with-libiconv-prefix=/software/stow/libiconv-1.14 (I tried with libiconv 1.9.1 first, but got the same error, so tried upgrading) ./configure gives me: checking whether iconv.h defines iconv_t... yes checking

Re: build problems on Solaris 8

2013-02-08 Thread Will Yardley
Also, if it matters, mutt 1.5.11 definitely built successfully (with iconv), though since I didn't install it and don't have the config.status from the old install, I don't know exactly how it was built. w

Re: build problems on Solaris 8

2013-02-08 Thread Will Yardley
On another system, I can get past the iconv errors in configure. But both with ncurses 5.2 and the builtin Solaris ncurses, I'm getting: gcc -Wall -pedantic -Wno-long-long -g -O2 -L/software/stow/openssl-0.9.7d/lib -L/software/stow/libiconv-1.9.1/lib -o mutt addrbook.o alias.o attach.o

Re: build problems on Solaris 8

2013-02-08 Thread Will Yardley
Found some stuff in: http://compgroups.net/comp.unix.solaris/mutt-1.5-compile-help-solaris-9/439938 and got a little further Now bailing on: Undefined first referenced symbol in file key_defined keymap.o Which I think has

Re: build problems on Solaris 8

2013-02-08 Thread Will Yardley
I was able to get it to build, after upgrading ncurses. Install failed until I upgraded autoconf (which in turn required a newer m4). w

Re: build problems on Solaris 8

2013-02-08 Thread Michael Elkins
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 02:39:46PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote: I was able to get it to build, after upgrading ncurses. Install failed until I upgraded autoconf (which in turn required a newer m4). Glad you figured that out. FYI, there are nightly snapshots here http://dev.mutt.org/nightlies/

Re: build problems on Solaris 8

2013-02-08 Thread Will Yardley
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:46:45PM +, Michael Elkins wrote: On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 02:39:46PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote: I was able to get it to build, after upgrading ncurses. Install failed until I upgraded autoconf (which in turn required a newer m4). Glad you figured that out.

Re: build problems on Solaris 8

2013-02-08 Thread Michael Elkins
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 03:48:33PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote: I noticed some discussion about that. Somehow, though, I had assumed that the nighlies would still need those tools compared to the current official dev snapshot. In any event, seems to be working now. They are built using the same

Re: build problems on Solaris 8

2013-02-08 Thread s. keeling
Incoming from Michael Elkins: FYI, there are nightly snapshots here http://dev.mutt.org/nightlies/ which avoid the need to have the developer toolchain installed. Michael, kind of off topic, I know, but why would you want to discourage people from learning the developer toolchain? Rolling

Re: build problems on Solaris 8

2013-02-08 Thread Will Yardley
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 05:30:03PM -0700, s. keeling wrote: Incoming from Michael Elkins: FYI, there are nightly snapshots here http://dev.mutt.org/nightlies/ which avoid the need to have the developer toolchain installed. Michael, kind of off topic, I know, but why would you want to

Re: build problems on Solaris 8

2013-02-08 Thread Michael Elkins
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 04:46:28PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote: I think the point is that minimizing the build dependencies for people who aren't developers should reduce build problems quite a bit. In this case it was a practical matter where the user wanted to build Mutt itself, but had auto*