Eugene --
...and then Eugene Lee said...
% Is there a way to change the tag-delete behavior so that when tagged
% messages are marked as deleted, the messages are also untagged? I know
% I can do this by setting up a new key, but I'd rather invent no new
% keystrokes if possible. Or should I
On 2000-02-28 02:48:42 -0800, Eugene Lee wrote:
Is there a way to change the tag-delete behavior so that when
tagged messages are marked as deleted, the messages are also
untagged? I know I can do this by setting up a new key, but I'd
rather invent no new keystrokes if possible. Or should
Eugene Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know I can do this by setting up a new key, but I'd rather invent no
new keystrokes if possible. Or should I just start practicing the
habit of tag-save to /dev/null? :)
Is this really what you do? Waste time writing messages to /dev/null
(it isn't
On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 03:03:19PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
:Eugene Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
: I know I can do this by setting up a new key, but I'd rather invent no
: new keystrokes if possible. Or should I just start practicing the
: habit of tag-save to /dev/null? :)
:
:Is this
Eugene Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Often I will tag lots of messages with certain subjects (usually when
the thread has become a flame fest), then do a ";d". But I'd like
that action to also untag the messages at the same time, which ";s"
does.
I have always considered the 'untag-on-save'
