Re: gpg-key probs
--uh9ZiVrAOUUm9fzH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! Rocco Rutte spake thus: On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 04:18:29:PM -0500 Shawn McMahon wrote: begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 11:02:23PM +0200: On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:07:58:PM -0500 ShRen McMahon wrote: ^ Is that a stylistic choice, or is your config broken? Config broken... I'll try to figure out what exactly is going wrong since it's working now without any change... Well, isn't Aw the German equivalent of Re? Looks like something is going through and making all your Aw's are actually Re's, but only on that one message... --=20 Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- For certain people, after fifty, litigation takes the place of sex. -- Gore Vidal --uh9ZiVrAOUUm9fzH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8qOlOPTh2iSBKeccRAr+8AJ9WH9PKxTKT/5a8nR/ir1Mh6QfL1QCfRbSD ZIhhrdozZMBwLNDy5ox8mDQ= =Nlx4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --uh9ZiVrAOUUm9fzH--
Re: gpg-key probs
Hi, * Rob 'Feztaa' Park [04/02/02 01:12:14] wrote: Alas! Rocco Rutte spake thus: On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 04:18:29:PM -0500 Shawn McMahon wrote: begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 11:02:23PM +0200: On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:07:58:PM -0500 ShRen McMahon wrote: ^ Is that a stylistic choice, or is your config broken? Config broken... I'll try to figure out what exactly is going wrong since it's working now without any change... Well, isn't Aw the German equivalent of Re? It's a term that some German versions of broken pieces of software use as default. Looks like something is going through and making all your Aw's are actually Re's, but only on that one message... Yeah, that was the reason. I just changed the right pattern to a wrong one allthough I wanted to change a wrong to a right one. That's why I thought I didn't change anything. But it should do now. Cheers, Rocco. msg26531/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: gpg-key probs
Hi, On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 04:14:23:PM -0500 David T-G wrote: ...and then Shawn McMahon said... % There's more than one keyserver network. So it seems. Are there just one or two, or are there a bunch, or does anyone really know? Do the servers in a given network synchronize with each other, or do even they have problems? There are a few, I guess. It would not make sence to not share the key database as much as possible. Imagine, a keyserver with a non-shared database is suddenly not available anymore. ... but it doesn't help at all if people don't submit their key because of paranoia. Rocco msg26484/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: gpg-key probs
begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 11:25:20PM +0100: ... but it doesn't help at all if people don't submit their key because of paranoia. What's most annoying are the folks who not only don't submit their key, but they also don't put it on their web page, or they don't put a link in their sigline. I know one person who has a demonstrated abundance of clue, but his sigline says finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for my public key, but foo.bar doesn't accept finger... msg26493/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: gpg-key probs
Hi, On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:07:58:PM -0500 ShRen McMahon wrote: begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 11:25:20PM +0100: ... but it doesn't help at all if people don't submit their key because of paranoia. What's most annoying are the folks who not only don't submit their key, but they also don't put it on their web page, or they don't put a link in their sigline. I don't care about that unless they don't sign anything. I always got the keys upon request. If they were absolutely consequent they would have to stop using their own key because it may be stored on a much more untrusted server than a keyserver, IMHO. The most secure way is to carry a disc with the keys from A to B to have absolute control of the carrier... Cheers, Rocco. msg26500/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: gpg-key probs
begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 11:02:23PM +0200: Hi, On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:07:58:PM -0500 ShRen McMahon wrote: ^ Is that a stylistic choice, or is your config broken? msg26501/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: gpg-key probs
Hi, On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 04:18:29:PM -0500 Shawn McMahon wrote: begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 11:02:23PM +0200: Hi, On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:07:58:PM -0500 ShRen McMahon wrote: ^ Is that a stylistic choice, or is your config broken? Config broken... I'll try to figure out what exactly is going wrong since it's working now without any change... Cheers, Rocco. msg26508/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: gpg-key probs
Hi, On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 04:14:23:PM -0500 David T-G wrote: Are there just one or two, or are there a bunch, or does anyone really know? Do the servers in a given network synchronize with each other, or do even they have problems? ,[ /home/pdmef/.gnupg/options ]- | | # Options for GnuPG | # Copyright 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc. | # | [...] | # GnuPG can import a key from a HKP keyerver if one is missing | # for certain operations. Is you set this option to a keyserver | # you will be asked in such a case whether GnuPG should try to | # import the key from that server (server do syncronize with each | # other and DNS Round-Robin may give you a random server each time). | # Use host -l pgp.net | grep www to figure out a keyserver. | # | # If you do not want to use the default port 11371, you can give the | # name of the keyserver like this: | # x-hkp://keyserver.example.net:22742 | # If you have problems connecting through a buggy proxy, you can use this: | # x-broken-hkp://keyserver.example.net:11371 | # But first you should make sure that you have read the man page regarding | # proxies (--honor-http-proxy) | # Most users just set the name of the preferred keyserver. | keyserver blackhole.pca.dfn.de | `- Cheers, Rocco. msg26406/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
gpg-key probs (Was: Re: Tag or delete...)
* John Buttery [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-28 04.07 GMT -0600]: [...snip...] That's odd, I get the same thing as Shawn: gpg: Signature made Wed 27 Mar 2002 02:29:20 PM CST using DSA key ID 57C3430B gpg: requesting key 57C3430B from wwwkeys.us.pgp.net ... gpg: key 57C3430B: invalid subkey binding gpg: key 57C3430B: no valid user IDs And I get the same as David. I use 'keyserver pgp.mit.edu'. But you should only have to upload to _one_ keyserver, right? As you said, John: odd. regards, -- Martin Karlsson msg26349/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: gpg-key probs (Was: Re: Tag or delete...)
begin quoting what Martin Karlsson said on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 12:36:32PM +0100: And I get the same as David. I use 'keyserver pgp.mit.edu'. But you should only have to upload to _one_ keyserver, right? There's more than one keyserver network. However, it's easier to ask somebody what server they use, and then figure out what network it's on, than to ask them what network it's on. They can get the answer to the one question from their options file; the other requires clue. Not saying anyone involved in this discussion doesn't have clue, just saying the general case. msg26368/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: gpg-key probs (Was: Re: Tag or delete...)
Shawn, et al -- ...and then Shawn McMahon said... % % begin quoting what Martin Karlsson said on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 12:36:32PM +0100: % % And I get the same as David. I use 'keyserver pgp.mit.edu'. % But you should only have to upload to _one_ keyserver, right? % % There's more than one keyserver network. So it seems. Are there just one or two, or are there a bunch, or does anyone really know? Do the servers in a given network synchronize with each other, or do even they have problems? I have this huge list of keyservers in my options file and it would be nice to *know* that I could prune it down to one per network and go from there, assuming I know which machines are in which networks. Since gpg doesn't offer any simple way to rotate or fall through key servers, the list I have is hardly helpful, either. TIA HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg26370/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: gpg-key probs (Was: Re: Tag or delete...)
begin quoting what David T-G said on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 04:14:23PM -0500: Are there just one or two, or are there a bunch, or does anyone really know? Do the servers in a given network synchronize with each other, or do even they have problems? I think there are a few, and some of them synchronize with others. Beyond that, I dunno. Generally they're clustered around a given piece of keyserver software, so you can probably track them somewhat that way. msg26372/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
