Re: hcache and display options

2019-10-07 Thread kevin shell
In article <20191007084346.gc24...@bastion.zyxst.net> you wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 03:07:16PM +0100, tech-lists wrote: > [...] > > thanks for the pointers. Does slang have any advantages over ncurses though? I > have both, and use slang in slrn. There is ncurses in the OS and a later >

Re: hcache and display options

2019-10-07 Thread tech-lists
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 03:07:16PM +0100, tech-lists wrote: [...] thanks for the pointers. Does slang have any advantages over ncurses though? I have both, and use slang in slrn. There is ncurses in the OS and a later version is in ports (FreeBSD) -- J. signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: hcache and display options

2019-10-05 Thread kevin shell
In article <20191002140743.ga24...@bastion.zyxst.net> you wrote: > > Hi, > > When compiling mutt, I have several options for the header cache: > > 1. HCACHE_TOKYOCABINET > 2. HCACHE_KYOTOCABINET > 3. HCACHE_NONE > 4. HCACHE_BDB > > Which is "best"? I use mutt with imap directly. The machine

hcache and display options

2019-10-02 Thread tech-lists
Hi, When compiling mutt, I have several options for the header cache: 1. HCACHE_TOKYOCABINET 2. HCACHE_KYOTOCABINET 3. HCACHE_NONE 4. HCACHE_BDB Which is "best"? I use mutt with imap directly. The machine it's on has an old sse2/sse3 cpu, but 8GB RAM. The drive is SSD (230GB) I also have