Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-27 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 12:57:23:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: Alas! Rocco Rutte spake thus: A lot of people on this list and others have creative X- headers that I enjoy reading. It's just as much a part of the email as the body of the message is. As your X-Uptime header

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-27 Thread David T-G
Rob -- ...and then Feztaa said... % % Alright, I wasn't exactly thinking when I said all gpl, but you know % what I mean. Everything on my system is compiled from source, it's all % one free license or another. We figured out what you meant when you made such a broad and fairly unsupportable

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-27 Thread David T-G
Rob -- ...and then Feztaa said... % % Alas! Will Yardley spake thus: % Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: % I don't use ps. Or any replacements. % % why ever not? % % Because I don't really know what it is, what it does, or why I'd ever % want to use it. ps is process status or something like

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-27 Thread Simon White
27-Mar-02 at 08:09, David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : % Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: % I don't use ps. Or any replacements. % % why ever not? % % Because I don't really know what it is, what it does, or why I'd ever % want to use it. ps is process status or something like that,

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-27 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
--zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! Rocco Rutte spake thus: As your X-Uptime header which could be - at least - at bit more specific? ;-) =20 What are you getting at? ;) =20 Sorry, I

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread David T-G
Rob -- ...and then Feztaa said... % % Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus: % You can have it both ways; use Procmail to prepend X-Nuke at the % beginning of all the bad lines, then ignore X-Nuke. % % That brings us back to the first problem though: How do I ignore X-Nuke % without ignoring the

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread David T-G
Rob -- ...and then Feztaa said... % % Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus: % That brings us back to the first problem though: How do I ignore X-Nuke % without ignoring the other X- headers? (without using the huge mess % david posted). % % ignore received x-nuke % % There are other headers

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
Alas! Rocco Rutte spake thus: A lot of people on this list and others have creative X- headers that I enjoy reading. It's just as much a part of the email as the body of the message is. As your X-Uptime header which could be - at least - at bit more specific? ;-) What are you getting

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
--vJguvTgX93MxBIIe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable David, it's wakie-wakie time! Alas! David T-G spake thus: % That brings us back to the first problem though: How do I ignore X-Nuke % without ignoring the

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
--xHbokkKX1kTiQeDC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! David T-G spake thus: Just working isn't enough. It has to be elegant and clever with a dash of magic. *mutter* Kids these days... How is my solution

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread David T-G
Rob -- ...and then Feztaa said... % % Alas! David T-G spake thus: % Just working isn't enough. It has to be elegant and clever with a dash % of magic. *mutter* Kids these days... % % How is my solution not elegant? It's a simple 3 lines that trashes a % bunch of headers that I don't want

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread David T-G
Rob -- ...and then Feztaa said... % % David, it's wakie-wakie time! What? 42! The battle of the bulge! % % Alas! David T-G spake thus: % % That brings us back to the first problem though: How do I ignore X-Nuke % % without ignoring the other X- headers? (without using the huge mess % %

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
Alas! David T-G spake thus: % Lets see you work out an x-nuke solution and we'll see how many lines it % is... :P No, that's left as an exercise for the student. Really :-) This student is not interested in wasting time on procmail/formail silliness. I've just recompiled my kernel with

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 02:59:37PM -0700: [0] This officially means that every single binary on my entire system is GPL'd ;) You don't have ps? What are you using instead? msg26222/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
--bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus: begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 02:59:= 37PM -0700: [0] This officially means that every

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 07:29:08PM -0700: I don't use ps. Or any replacements. Ok. Do you use vim? msg26224/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread Michael Maibaum
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 02:59:37PM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: Alas! David T-G spake thus: % Lets see you work out an x-nuke solution and we'll see how many lines it % is... :P [0] This officially means that every single binary on my entire system is GPL'd ;) SSH, openssl? I

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread Will Yardley
Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: I don't use ps. Or any replacements. why ever not? what license does the version of 'ps' you're talking about use? for that matter, i'm almost certain there's a GNU version of ps for all you freakin' GNazis. ladd% apt-get source procps Reading Package Lists... Done

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! Will Yardley spake thus: Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: I don't use ps. Or any replacements. =20 why ever not? Because I don't really know what it is, what

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what Will Yardley said on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 07:02:10PM -0800: /home/william/procps-2.0.7/ps ladd% head COPYING GNU LIBRARY GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE You quoted it right there; it's not GPL, it's LGPL. I was yanking Rob's chain, because he's an evil

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread John Buttery
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-25 14:05:45 -0700]: Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus: You can have it both ways; use Procmail to prepend X-Nuke at the beginning of all the bad lines, then ignore X-Nuke. That brings us back to the first problem though: How do I ignore X-Nuke

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-25 Thread David T-G
Rob, et al -- ...and then Feztaa said... % % Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus: % % Or list all of the obnoxious ones, and then set up procmail to strip % them out; that will work as a general solution in case somebody else % uses Incredimail. % % Hey, that's a good idea. But how do I strip

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-25 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
--2FkSFaIQeDFoAt0B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! David T-G spake thus: Rather than using procmail, which will *gasp* change the mail as it comes in, just have mutt ignore those headers that you don't

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-25 Thread David T-G
Rob -- ...and then Feztaa said... % % Alas! David T-G spake thus: % Rather than using procmail, which will *gasp* change the mail as it comes % in, just have mutt ignore those headers that you don't want to see and % update your list as you see new ones. To wit: ... % % Oh yuck! You don't

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-25 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
--cPi+lWm09sJ+d57q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! David T-G spake thus: % Oh yuck! You don't honestly believe that that mess is a better solution % than a 3-line procmail recepie, do you? =20 Sure I

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-25 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 12:44:26PM -0700: Besides, I'm only doing it to Incredimail users. I mean, if they want to accost me with tons of useless X- headers, I shouldn't have to put up with them (the headers, not the people) :P If you want elegant:

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-25 Thread David T-G
Shawn, et al -- ...and then Shawn McMahon said... % % If you want elegant: % % ignore * % unignore date from: reply-to to cc subject list user-agent x-mailer % % I mean, who really cares about all that other crapola? Well, yeah. If you want to go that far, ... % % Most people could go

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-25 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 01:25:23PM -0700: I'd rather just rip off all the useless headers with an elegant 3-line procmail recipie than have to hide them all with 10 or 20 lines of ignore statements. You can have it both ways; use Procmail to

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-25 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
--CNfT9TXqV7nd4cfk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus: I mean, who really cares about all that other crapola? A lot of people on this list and others have creative X- headers that I

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-25 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
--MFZs98Tklfu0WsCO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus: You can have it both ways; use Procmail to prepend X-Nuke at the beginning of all the bad lines, then ignore X-Nuke. That

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-25 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 02:05:45PM -0700: That brings us back to the first problem though: How do I ignore X-Nuke without ignoring the other X- headers? (without using the huge mess david posted). ignore received x-nuke msg26096/pgp0.pgp

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-25 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
--yklP1rR72f9kjNtc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus: That brings us back to the first problem though: How do I ignore X-Nuke without ignoring the other X- headers? (without using

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-25 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 02:34:48PM -0700: ignore received x-nuke There are other headers I want to hide though. When I said have procmail prepend all the bad headers, I meant every header you'd like to hide. The only headers that I _want_ to see

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-25 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 02:02:17:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: A lot of people on this list and others have creative X- headers that I enjoy reading. It's just as much a part of the email as the body of the message is. As your X-Uptime header which could be - at least - at bit more

ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-24 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
This is really weird. I have the following lines in my muttrc: ignore * unignore date from: reply-to to cc subject x- list user-agent ignore x-status x-uid x-keywords x-accept-language x-imagebase x-fid ignore x-mailer x-priority x-fid x-fver x-fit x-fcol x-fcat x-fdis ignore x-extensions x-bg

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-24 Thread Martin Karlsson
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-24 11.15 -0700]: This is really weird. I have the following lines in my muttrc: ignore * unignore date from: reply-to to cc subject x- list user-agent ignore x-status x-uid x-keywords x-accept-language x-imagebase x-fid ignore x-mailer

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-24 Thread Martin Karlsson
* Martin Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-24 19.26 +0100]: * Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-24 11.15 -0700]: This is really weird. I have the following lines in my muttrc: ignore * unignore date from: reply-to to cc subject x- list user-agent

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-24 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
--9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! Martin Karlsson spake thus: * Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-24 11.15 -0700]: This is really weird. I have the following lines in my

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-24 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 01:42:09PM -0700: Maybe I could set up a hook of some kind that hides X- headers for my grandmother and nobody else? Or list all of the obnoxious ones, and then set up procmail to strip them out; that will work as a general

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-24 Thread Martin Karlsson
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-24 13.42 -0700]: [...snip...] Then one day my grandmother started using IncrediMail (I think) and now all her emails have 3 screenfuls of useless X- headers that I want to hide, without hiding the X- headers of *nix-using people who have creative

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-24 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
--L6iaP+gRLNZHKoI4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus: begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 01:42:09PM -0700: Maybe I could set up a hook of some kind

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-24 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 02:02:55PM -0700: Hey, that's a good idea. But how do I strip headers in procmail? Run stuff through sed, I suppose. I've never tried, but it should work. msg26006/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-24 Thread Martin Karlsson
Okay, did som testing (nothing thorough, mind you), and this seems to be one of many(?) ways of doing it in Mutt. message-hook '~f [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 'ignore x-' message-hook '~f @' 'unignore the headers I want to see' I guess these'll take precedence over the original values in your .muttrc.

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-24 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky
* Shawn McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-24 16:06:29 -0500]: begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 02:02:55PM -0700: Hey, that's a good idea. But how do I strip headers in procmail? Run stuff through sed, I suppose. I've never tried, but it should work.

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-24 Thread Thorsten Haude
Hi, * Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-03-24 22:02]: Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus: begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 01:42:09PM -0700: Maybe I could set up a hook of some kind that hides X- headers for my grandmother and nobody else? Or list all of

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-24 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
--doKZ0ri6bHmN2Q5y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! Nicolas Rachinsky spake thus: Run stuff through sed, I suppose. I've never tried, but it should work. =20 formail with -I You mean something like this

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-24 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-24 15:09:38 -0700]: Alas! Nicolas Rachinsky spake thus: Run stuff through sed, I suppose. I've never tried, but it should work. formail with -I You mean something like this at the beginning of my procmailrc: :0 Whf: * X-Mailer:

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-24 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
--7iMSBzlTiPOCCT2k Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! Rob 'Feztaa' Park spake thus: :0 Whf: * X-Mailer: IncrediMail.* |formail -I X- I'm not sure if it makes much difference, but I ended up using this: :0