Hi,
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 12:57:23:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
Alas! Rocco Rutte spake thus:
A lot of people on this list and others have creative X- headers that I
enjoy reading. It's just as much a part of the email as the body of the
message is.
As your X-Uptime header
Rob --
...and then Feztaa said...
%
% Alright, I wasn't exactly thinking when I said all gpl, but you know
% what I mean. Everything on my system is compiled from source, it's all
% one free license or another.
We figured out what you meant when you made such a broad and fairly
unsupportable
Rob --
...and then Feztaa said...
%
% Alas! Will Yardley spake thus:
% Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
% I don't use ps. Or any replacements.
%
% why ever not?
%
% Because I don't really know what it is, what it does, or why I'd ever
% want to use it.
ps is process status or something like
27-Mar-02 at 08:09, David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
% Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
% I don't use ps. Or any replacements.
%
% why ever not?
%
% Because I don't really know what it is, what it does, or why I'd ever
% want to use it.
ps is process status or something like that,
--zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Rocco Rutte spake thus:
As your X-Uptime header which could be - at least - at bit more
specific? ;-)
=20
What are you getting at? ;)
=20
Sorry, I
Rob --
...and then Feztaa said...
%
% Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus:
% You can have it both ways; use Procmail to prepend X-Nuke at the
% beginning of all the bad lines, then ignore X-Nuke.
%
% That brings us back to the first problem though: How do I ignore X-Nuke
% without ignoring the
Rob --
...and then Feztaa said...
%
% Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus:
% That brings us back to the first problem though: How do I ignore X-Nuke
% without ignoring the other X- headers? (without using the huge mess
% david posted).
%
% ignore received x-nuke
%
% There are other headers
Alas! Rocco Rutte spake thus:
A lot of people on this list and others have creative X- headers that I
enjoy reading. It's just as much a part of the email as the body of the
message is.
As your X-Uptime header which could be - at least - at bit more
specific? ;-)
What are you getting
--vJguvTgX93MxBIIe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
David, it's wakie-wakie time!
Alas! David T-G spake thus:
% That brings us back to the first problem though: How do I ignore X-Nuke
% without ignoring the
--xHbokkKX1kTiQeDC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! David T-G spake thus:
Just working isn't enough. It has to be elegant and clever with a dash
of magic. *mutter* Kids these days...
How is my solution
Rob --
...and then Feztaa said...
%
% Alas! David T-G spake thus:
% Just working isn't enough. It has to be elegant and clever with a dash
% of magic. *mutter* Kids these days...
%
% How is my solution not elegant? It's a simple 3 lines that trashes a
% bunch of headers that I don't want
Rob --
...and then Feztaa said...
%
% David, it's wakie-wakie time!
What? 42! The battle of the bulge!
%
% Alas! David T-G spake thus:
% % That brings us back to the first problem though: How do I ignore X-Nuke
% % without ignoring the other X- headers? (without using the huge mess
% %
Alas! David T-G spake thus:
% Lets see you work out an x-nuke solution and we'll see how many lines it
% is... :P
No, that's left as an exercise for the student. Really :-)
This student is not interested in wasting time on procmail/formail
silliness.
I've just recompiled my kernel with
begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 02:59:37PM -0700:
[0] This officially means that every single binary on my entire system
is GPL'd ;)
You don't have ps? What are you using instead?
msg26222/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus:
begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 02:59:=
37PM -0700:
[0] This officially means that every
begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 07:29:08PM -0700:
I don't use ps. Or any replacements.
Ok. Do you use vim?
msg26224/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 02:59:37PM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
Alas! David T-G spake thus:
% Lets see you work out an x-nuke solution and we'll see how many lines it
% is... :P
[0] This officially means that every single binary on my entire system
is GPL'd ;)
SSH, openssl? I
Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
I don't use ps. Or any replacements.
why ever not? what license does the version of 'ps' you're talking about
use?
for that matter, i'm almost certain there's a GNU version of ps for all
you freakin' GNazis.
ladd% apt-get source procps
Reading Package Lists... Done
--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Will Yardley spake thus:
Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
I don't use ps. Or any replacements.
=20
why ever not?
Because I don't really know what it is, what
begin quoting what Will Yardley said on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 07:02:10PM -0800:
/home/william/procps-2.0.7/ps
ladd% head COPYING
GNU LIBRARY GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
You quoted it right there; it's not GPL, it's LGPL.
I was yanking Rob's chain, because he's an evil
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-25 14:05:45 -0700]:
Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus:
You can have it both ways; use Procmail to prepend X-Nuke at the
beginning of all the bad lines, then ignore X-Nuke.
That brings us back to the first problem though: How do I ignore X-Nuke
Rob, et al --
...and then Feztaa said...
%
% Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus:
%
% Or list all of the obnoxious ones, and then set up procmail to strip
% them out; that will work as a general solution in case somebody else
% uses Incredimail.
%
% Hey, that's a good idea. But how do I strip
--2FkSFaIQeDFoAt0B
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! David T-G spake thus:
Rather than using procmail, which will *gasp* change the mail as it comes
in, just have mutt ignore those headers that you don't
Rob --
...and then Feztaa said...
%
% Alas! David T-G spake thus:
% Rather than using procmail, which will *gasp* change the mail as it comes
% in, just have mutt ignore those headers that you don't want to see and
% update your list as you see new ones. To wit:
...
%
% Oh yuck! You don't
--cPi+lWm09sJ+d57q
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! David T-G spake thus:
% Oh yuck! You don't honestly believe that that mess is a better solution
% than a 3-line procmail recepie, do you?
=20
Sure I
begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 12:44:26PM -0700:
Besides, I'm only doing it to Incredimail users. I mean, if they want to
accost me with tons of useless X- headers, I shouldn't have to put up with
them (the headers, not the people) :P
If you want elegant:
Shawn, et al --
...and then Shawn McMahon said...
%
% If you want elegant:
%
% ignore *
% unignore date from: reply-to to cc subject list user-agent x-mailer
%
% I mean, who really cares about all that other crapola?
Well, yeah. If you want to go that far, ...
%
% Most people could go
begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 01:25:23PM -0700:
I'd rather just rip off all the useless headers with an elegant 3-line
procmail recipie than have to hide them all with 10 or 20 lines of
ignore statements.
You can have it both ways; use Procmail to
--CNfT9TXqV7nd4cfk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus:
I mean, who really cares about all that other crapola?
A lot of people on this list and others have creative X- headers that I
--MFZs98Tklfu0WsCO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus:
You can have it both ways; use Procmail to prepend X-Nuke at the
beginning of all the bad lines, then ignore X-Nuke.
That
begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 02:05:45PM -0700:
That brings us back to the first problem though: How do I ignore X-Nuke
without ignoring the other X- headers? (without using the huge mess
david posted).
ignore received x-nuke
msg26096/pgp0.pgp
--yklP1rR72f9kjNtc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus:
That brings us back to the first problem though: How do I ignore X-Nuke
without ignoring the other X- headers? (without using
begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 02:34:48PM -0700:
ignore received x-nuke
There are other headers I want to hide though.
When I said have procmail prepend all the bad headers, I meant every
header you'd like to hide.
The only headers that I _want_ to see
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 02:02:17:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
A lot of people on this list and others have creative X- headers that I
enjoy reading. It's just as much a part of the email as the body of the
message is.
As your X-Uptime header which could be - at least - at bit more
This is really weird. I have the following lines in my muttrc:
ignore *
unignore date from: reply-to to cc subject x- list user-agent
ignore x-status x-uid x-keywords x-accept-language x-imagebase x-fid
ignore x-mailer x-priority x-fid x-fver x-fit x-fcol x-fcat x-fdis
ignore x-extensions x-bg
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-24 11.15 -0700]:
This is really weird. I have the following lines in my muttrc:
ignore *
unignore date from: reply-to to cc subject x- list user-agent
ignore x-status x-uid x-keywords x-accept-language x-imagebase x-fid
ignore x-mailer
* Martin Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-24 19.26 +0100]:
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-24 11.15 -0700]:
This is really weird. I have the following lines in my muttrc:
ignore *
unignore date from: reply-to to cc subject x- list user-agent
--9amGYk9869ThD9tj
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Martin Karlsson spake thus:
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-24 11.15 -0700]:
This is really weird. I have the following lines in my
begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 01:42:09PM -0700:
Maybe I could set up a hook of some kind that hides X- headers for my
grandmother and nobody else?
Or list all of the obnoxious ones, and then set up procmail to strip them
out; that will work as a general
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-24 13.42 -0700]:
[...snip...]
Then one day my grandmother started using IncrediMail (I think) and
now all her emails have 3 screenfuls of useless X- headers that I
want to hide, without hiding the X- headers of *nix-using people
who have creative
--L6iaP+gRLNZHKoI4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus:
begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at
01:42:09PM -0700:
Maybe I could set up a hook of some kind
begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 02:02:55PM -0700:
Hey, that's a good idea. But how do I strip headers in procmail?
Run stuff through sed, I suppose. I've never tried, but it should work.
msg26006/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Okay, did som testing (nothing thorough, mind you), and this seems
to be one of many(?) ways of doing it in Mutt.
message-hook '~f [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 'ignore x-'
message-hook '~f @' 'unignore the headers I want to see'
I guess these'll take precedence over the original values in your
.muttrc.
* Shawn McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-24 16:06:29 -0500]:
begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 02:02:55PM -0700:
Hey, that's a good idea. But how do I strip headers in procmail?
Run stuff through sed, I suppose. I've never tried, but it should work.
Hi,
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-03-24 22:02]:
Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus:
begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at
01:42:09PM -0700:
Maybe I could set up a hook of some kind that hides X- headers for
my grandmother and nobody else?
Or list all of
--doKZ0ri6bHmN2Q5y
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Nicolas Rachinsky spake thus:
Run stuff through sed, I suppose. I've never tried, but it should work.
=20
formail with -I
You mean something like this
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-24 15:09:38 -0700]:
Alas! Nicolas Rachinsky spake thus:
Run stuff through sed, I suppose. I've never tried, but it should work.
formail with -I
You mean something like this at the beginning of my procmailrc:
:0 Whf:
* X-Mailer:
--7iMSBzlTiPOCCT2k
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Rob 'Feztaa' Park spake thus:
:0 Whf:
* X-Mailer: IncrediMail.*
|formail -I X-
I'm not sure if it makes much difference, but I ended up using this:
:0
48 matches
Mail list logo