it wouldn't because w/o the question _I_ would forget to send
the return receipt). Something like this can automatically be triggered only by
message
hooks. But as the solution is extern (= a script), how do i call it from within
the message hook? I added a hook like this:
message-hook ~h Return
the question _I_ would forget to send
the return receipt). Something like this can automatically be triggered only
by message
hooks. But as the solution is extern (= a script), how do i call it from
within
the message hook? I added a hook like this:
message-hook ~h Return-Receipt-To: |/home
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 10:47:58AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Patrick Schoenfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-24-07 10:42]:
And even though the specified file is a valid executable script mutt says
(when
I open this mail in the pager):
first *guess* w/b that ~/.mutt/return_receipt script
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:40:33PM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
message-hook ~h Return-Receipt-To: |/home/schoenfeld/.mutt/return_receipt
And even though the specified file is a valid executable script mutt says
(when
I open this mail in the pager):
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:53:23PM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
What information do you expect me to presentate? Eventually my whole mutt
configuration just to ask why one specific message-hook (which I presentated)
is not working?
There is only one information that I see that I really
Hi Christian,
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:56:13PM +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote:
Do you mind formating your message with a width 80 chars?
no, thats no problem.
Depending on what your want try either shell-escape or pipe-message
Hm. That and what Dave Evans wrote works, at least partially.
it wouldn't because w/o the question
_I_ would forget to send the return receipt). Something like this
can automatically be triggered only by message hooks. But as the
solution is extern (= a script), how do i call it from within the
message hook? I added a hook like this:
message-hook ~h Return
Hi Patrick!
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:56:13PM +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote:
Do you mind formating your message with a width 80 chars?
no, thats no problem.
Depending on what your want try either shell-escape or pipe-message
Hm.
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:30:45PM +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote:
If you have used pipe-message I think your stdin has changed to the
messages you piped. And read expects your answer from that filehandle.
So you might try explicitly setting your tty with read yn /dev/tty
Okay, that might be
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:38:55PM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:30:45PM +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote:
If you have used pipe-message I think your stdin has changed to the
messages you piped. And read expects your answer from that filehandle.
So you might try
=- Patrick Schoenfeld wrote on Wed 24.Oct'07 at 17:18:54 +0200 -=
and waits for an input (read yn), but mutt adds its Press any
key to continue So it seems that mutt already answers the
question (what it shouldn't do). Also if I do press return to that
question, it restarts the script and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Patrick Schoenfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-24-07 11:01]:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:53:23PM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
What information do you expect me to presentate? Eventually my whole mutt
configuration just to ask why one specific
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 01:39:17PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
ls -la ~/.mutt/return_receipt
You should work on you ability to _read_ mails others write _properly_.
I told you, that the file _is_ executable. And as you eventually noticed
someone else already pointed the right solution out to
Rob --
...and then Feztaa said...
%
% Alas! Sven Guckes spake thus:
% Sven [mmh.. ye... deeper.. oh, yeah..]
%
% You sure that's a massage you're getting? ;)
No, it's a m-e-ssage, but it's from one of those lists ;-)
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to fight for
Alas! Sven Guckes spake thus:
Sven [mmh.. ye... deeper.. oh, yeah..]
You sure that's a massage you're getting? ;)
--
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Of course there's no reason for it, it's just our policy.
msg26037/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-25 05:33]:
Alas! Sven Guckes spake thus:
Sven [mmh.. ye... deeper.. oh, yeah..]
You sure that's a massage you're getting? ;)
I dunno... but I'm certainly HOOKED. hehe
Sven
I'm trying to do something here, maybe it's not doable - who knows?
what I want is that whenever I write or reply to a certain address, that
message will be automagically BCCed to another address. I tried using
send-hooks, but those do not seem to affect the current message, only
subsequent
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 08:36:55 -0500
From: Dan Boger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mutt Users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: message-hooks
I'm trying to do something here, maybe it's not doable - who knows?
what I want is that whenever I write or reply to a certain address, that
message
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 07:21:28PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
what I want is that whenever I write or reply to a certain address, that
message will be automagically BCCed to another address. I tried using
send-hooks, but those do not seem to affect the current message, only
subsequent
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 01:16:59PM -0500, Dan Boger wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 07:21:28PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
what I want is that whenever I write or reply to a certain address, that
message will be automagically BCCed to another address. I tried using
send-hooks, but
20 matches
Mail list logo
