Re: question/suggestion

2021-10-26 Thread Derek Martin
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 08:13:15PM -0400, John Hawkinson wrote: > Derek Martin wrote on Mon, 25 Oct 2021 > at 19:00:12 EDT in <20211025230012.gc9...@bladeshadow.org>: > > > Cost? I see no cost, other than the time needed to physically check > > My Oct. 7 email, to which you replied, enumerated

Re: question/suggestion

2021-10-25 Thread John Hawkinson
Derek Martin wrote on Mon, 25 Oct 2021 at 19:00:12 EDT in <20211025230012.gc9...@bladeshadow.org>: > Cost? I see no cost, other than the time needed to physically check My Oct. 7 email, to which you replied, enumerated several costs that I perceived. That you go on to state that you perceive

Re: question/suggestion

2021-10-25 Thread Derek Martin
On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 11:52:02PM -0400, John Hawkinson wrote: > ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ wrote on Thu, 7 Oct 2021 > at 23:32:00 EDT in : > > > Any email client (including mobile email clients) worth its salt is > > going to wrap the subject line (at least in the email view, if not > > in the index

Re: question/suggestion

2021-10-08 Thread raf
On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 06:50:24PM +1100, raf wrote: > My advice is, don't worry about the default. > If you don't like it, just change it. > > "man muttrc" and look for "forward_format". > > I think you want something like this in your ~/.muttrc: > > set forward_format = "Fwd: %s" > > or:

Re: question/suggestion

2021-10-08 Thread raf
My advice is, don't worry about the default. If you don't like it, just change it. "man muttrc" and look for "forward_format". I think you want something like this in your ~/.muttrc: set forward_format = "Fwd: %s" or: set forward_format = "FW: %s" They are both common patterns. And they

Re: question/suggestion

2021-10-07 Thread Globe Trotter via Mutt-users
So, in my opinion, communication is most effective if the recipient easily comprehends what is conveyed to him/her. I suspect most recipients of our e-mails do not know much about mutt except that you likely get it from a place other than a breeder. So, [mutt-users@mutt.org: Email Subject]

Re: question/suggestion

2021-10-07 Thread ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್
12021/06/39 09:94.47 ನಲ್ಲಿ, John Hawkinson ಬರೆದರು: > ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ wrote on Thu, 7 Oct 2021 > at 23:32:00 EDT in : > > > Any email client (including mobile email clients) worth its salt is > > going to wrap the subject line (at least in the email view, if not > > in the index view), so that

Re: question/suggestion

2021-10-07 Thread John Hawkinson
ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ wrote on Thu, 7 Oct 2021 at 23:32:00 EDT in : > Any email client (including mobile email clients) worth its salt is > going to wrap the subject line (at least in the email view, if not > in the index view), so that shouldn't really be an issue, right? My principal concern is with

Re: question/suggestion

2021-10-07 Thread ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್
12021/06/39 09:52.97 ನಲ್ಲಿ, John Hawkinson ಬರೆದರು: > I'd object to the proposal to add the "FW: " characters to the default. Space > is at a premium in modern Subject lines, especially with the prevalence of > mobile devices that have limited screen real estate, and cutting out 3 > characters

Re: question/suggestion

2021-10-07 Thread John Hawkinson
I'd object to the proposal to add the "FW: " characters to the default. Space is at a premium in modern Subject lines, especially with the prevalence of mobile devices that have limited screen real estate, and cutting out 3 characters is very undesirable. I think it's pretty clear from context

Re: question/suggestion

2021-10-07 Thread ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್
12021/06/39 09:27.23 ನಲ್ಲಿ, Globe Trotter via Mutt-users ಬರೆದರು: > When I foward my mutt-composed email, I have something like the following, > which I believe is the default behaviour: > > [mutt-users@mutt.org: Email subject] > > which I think is very nice because it gives the recipient an

question/suggestion

2021-10-07 Thread Globe Trotter via Mutt-users
When I foward my mutt-composed email, I have something like the following, which I believe is the default behaviour: [mutt-users@mutt.org: Email subject] which I think is very nice because it gives the recipient an idea of whether the originator of this email is someone s/he should even bother