Adrian Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 24 Oct 2000:
> > send-hook . 'unmy_hdr From:'
>
>Is this classified as a bug, or a feature? :)
It's a feature, a design desicision. Since you can use any muttrc
command in send-hooks, it would be unworkably complex to try to limit
the scope to
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 05:32:15PM -0400, Adrian Chung wrote:
> > exactly. when you set the sig, or a header, it's not only for that message.
> > so you need to do something like:
> >
> > send-hook . 'unmy_hdr From:'
> > send-hook . 'unset signature'
>
>Cool, so it's not just me...
>
>
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 05:22:30PM -0400, Dan Boger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 04:53:25PM -0400, Adrian Chung wrote:
> > set from="Adrian Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> > alternates="(support|achung)@mycompany\.(com|net|org)"
> >
> > send-hook '~f support@mycompany' 'my_hd
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 04:53:25PM -0400, Adrian Chung wrote:
> set from="Adrian Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> alternates="(support|achung)@mycompany\.(com|net|org)"
>
> send-hook '~f support@mycompany' 'my_hdr From: company support
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
> send-hook '~f support@mycompany' 'set si
Hi! I figured out how to set things up so that now I can properly reply to
different people based on the original inbound email address.
But I ran into a strange occurrence, which I'm not sure is my fault.
I've set up mutt so that:
set reverse_name
set from="Adrian Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
a
