Thus spake Rocco Rutte [05/21/08 @ 09.18.56 +0200]:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thus spake Rocco Rutte [05/15/08 @ 16.16.10 +0200]:
http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/2978
I just downloaded the source and built. I don't use macports at all.
BerkeleyDB compiles flawlessly on Panther and
Hi,
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thus spake Rocco Rutte [05/15/08 @ 16.16.10 +0200]:
http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/2978
I just downloaded the source and built. I don't use macports at all.
BerkeleyDB compiles flawlessly on Panther and Tiger for me.
Good, thanks for the feedback.
Thus spake Rocco Rutte [05/15/08 @ 16.16.10 +0200]:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW: I built using the BerkeleyDB libraries, since the other choices
refuse to work with OSX. (Actually, I finally got mutt to build with gdb,
but mutt behaved *really* weird with screen-drawing, so gdb is a
Hi,
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW: I built using the BerkeleyDB libraries, since the other choices
refuse to work with OSX. (Actually, I finally got mutt to build with
gdb, but mutt behaved *really* weird with screen-drawing, so gdb is a
no-go on OSX).
How do you do that exactly? qdbm
[...]
That's why they recently added $time_inc (it's not in a released
version of mutt yet; just in the current development tree). Here's the
description from the development manual:
Sweet. My INBOX opens nearly instantaneously now. And I thought that
it's the hcache being slow.
Thank you
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Saturday, May 10, 2008 at 18:07:04 -0400
1.5.17 with header caching enabled. I've got read_inc and
write_inc set to 1000. Nevertheless, I've noticed that the
process of evaluating the cache (when I switch into a big
folder) is significantly slower when I use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, May 10 at 06:07 PM, quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
1.5.17 with header caching enabled. I've got read_inc and write_inc
set to 1000. Nevertheless, I've noticed that the process of
evaluating the cache (when I switch into a big folder) is
Hello,
1.5.17 with header caching enabled. I've got read_inc and write_inc set to
1000. Nevertheless, I've noticed that the process of evaluating the cache
(when I switch into a big folder) is significantly slower when I use
Terminal.app than if I use xterm/rxvt over Apple's X11.
This is
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-10-2008]:
1.5.17 with header caching enabled. I've got read_inc and write_inc
set to 1000. Nevertheless, I've noticed that the process of
evaluating the cache (when I switch into a big folder) is
significantly slower when I use Terminal.app
