On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 10:25:47AM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2018-10-25 13:06, Derek Martin wrote:
>
> > Derek D. Martinhttp://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02
>
> Oh, I feel the itch again. Ow-ow, it's unbearable! I must scratch,
>
> Has anyone tried to verify Derek's
Re-sending this to see if it is a reliable repro case.
On 2018-10-27 16:53, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> > Oh, I feel the itch again. Ow-ow, it's unbearable! I must scratch,
> >
> > Has anyone tried to verify Derek's GPG signature on his message?
>
> Checking, checking, checking gently,
> Why it
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 11:39:37PM +1100, Ben McGinnes wrote:
> >> Well, verifying the identity of an unknown person with some server
> >> over the Inrernet is not very reliable, isn't it?
> >
> > In what way? I think gnupg.net is a pretty secure source to look up
> > keys. There's no other way
On Sat, Oct 27, 2018, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2018-10-27 18:23, Claus Assmann wrote:
> > Just FYI: both test mails passed verification for me.
> RGH!! I am losing my mind!!
Hopefully it's backed up somewhere...
> Here are the intermediate Received headers of the 2nd test mail as it
>
On 2018-10-28 04:19, Claus Assmann wrote:
> > RGH!! I am losing my mind!!
>
> Hopefully it's backed up somewhere...
;-)
> If you kept a copies of the mails which you originally sent
> and which you got back: what's the "diff"?
Indeed I have kept a file copy. The diff confirms my
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 09:54:54PM +0100, David Woodfall wrote:
> On Monday 13 August 2018 20:22,
> Matthias Apitz put forth the proposition:
>> On Monday, 13 August 2018 18:59:38 CEST, David Woodfall >>>
Dave, do you verify gnuPG keys/signs on the fly? Is this secure?
Thx
>>>
>>> Mutt
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 08:55:00AM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> Perhaps there is a little clue here. Some kind of load balancing seems
> to be in effect at osuosl, different hosts (silver, whitealder,
> fraxinus, ash) are involved each time. Possibly different amavis
> configuration on some of
