On 2019-07-07 10:03, José María Mateos wrote:
Mmmh... I don't understand. Aren't those the same two lines? I don't see
any difference between them.
Whoops. The second one should have been:
“This is ”
“one line.”
Becomes:
“This is one line.”
On 2019-07-08 21:12, José María Mateos wrote:
On Sun, Jul 07, 2019 at 06:14:15PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
There actually may be an issue with Mutt here. I think the
space-stuffing is not working, but I haven't had enough time yet to
look into the problem and possible solutions more de
On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 07:39:22PM -0400, sunnycemet...@gmail.com wrote:
> Whoops. The second one should have been:
>
> >“This is ”
> >“one line.”
> >
> >Becomes:
> >
> >“This is one line.”
Ah, I understand now, thanks :-)
--
José María (Chema) Mateos || https://rinzewind.org/
On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 07:56:24PM -0400, sunnycemet...@gmail.com wrote:
> I concur. Hanging indents lie beyond the scope of RFC 3676.
Indeed, that is the problem.
> They also don't align necessarily when proportionately spaced fonts
> are used, but José probably already knows this. As an altern