On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 01:05:13PM -0500, José María Mateos wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 06:15:14PM +0100, Dennis Preiser wrote:
>>
>> folder-hook . 'set my_record=$record; \
>> set record=^; \
>> macro index,pager G "echo $record"; \
>> set record=$my_record'
>
> Thanks for your suggestion.
On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 07:30:13PM +0100, Dennis Preiser wrote:
When I use the following macro inside the folder-hook (I don't have
offlineimap)
macro index,pager G "!/bin/echo $record\n"; \
Ok, found the issue. The problem is that the folder name contains '='
(as in =INBOX) and for folders
On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 06:15:14PM +0100, Dennis Preiser wrote:
folder-hook . 'set my_record=$record; \
set record=^; \
macro index,pager G "echo $record"; \
set record=$my_record'
Thanks for your suggestion. I tried this:
folder-hook . 'set
On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 09:19:22AM -0500, José María Mateos wrote:
> I have this macro:
>
> macro index,pager G "!offlineimap -o -l /tmp/offlineimap.log\n" "Retrieve new
> IMAP messages"
>
> It works well, but I typically use only for =INBOX, so checking all the
> folders (the default
On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 07:30:13PM +0100, Dennis Preiser wrote:
> Just to be sure: You don't have another macro "macro index,pager G ..."
> behind the folder-hook?
This question is nonsense, the folder hook would overwrite it.
Dennis
Hi everybody,
I have this macro:
macro index,pager G "!offlineimap -o -l /tmp/offlineimap.log\n" "Retrieve new IMAP
messages"
It works well, but I typically use only for =INBOX, so checking all the
folders (the default behaviour) is a waste. I've been trying to find if
there's any way to
