On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 07:26:42PM -0800, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 06:14:26PM -0800, Joe Rhett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I realize that most of you have filters which keep you from seeing doubles,
but this doesn't mean that the problem shouldn't be resolved. Is there
On Mon, Feb 15, 1999 at 11:55:35AM -0500, Michael Sanders wrote:
Since the on-line manual at http://www.mutt.org/manual.html is still an old
one, I have put the html version of the 0.95.3 manual up at
http://tms.physics.lsa.umich.edu/mutt/
If the manual is up to date, if someone sends me a
On Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 10:25:19PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
David Thorburn-Gundlach schrieb am Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 02:20:47PM -0500:
[...] and noticed that the mutt home page is still listed at
hmc.edu.
... and when doing a "mutt -v", the last line says: "To contact the
developers,
On Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 03:33:11PM -0700, Franklin R. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 09:56:48PM +, Steve Kennedy wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 02:54:51PM -0700, Franklin R. Jones wrote:
while on the subject of mailing addresses and such. It would
also be useful to change
Sorry, the lists may have broken last night.
I added an account to allow the web pages to be modified
by a new maintainer, and unfortunately changed ownership
on the
On Sat, Feb 27, 1999 at 05:33:32PM -0500, Randall J. Million wrote:
I keep subscribing and then suddenly after a few emails everything
dries up... Do I get get dropped automatically after a couple of days
if I don't pick up mail?
No. Your mail address bounced some mail and you were
On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 05:08:54PM -0500, Ken W wrote:
Hi, I am trying to patch mutt on a new system witht he same patches I
have always used on BSD systems, but this system is Solaris. When I
run 'patch patchfile' I get the following:
The next patch looks like a unified context diff.
Can people who follow-up to messages on this list and
include the previous messages (generally tagged on at the
end), remove the headers (or the irrelevant ones at least).
Due to previous mail loops problems, some of the received
lines cause the loop detection to kick in, thus the messages
get
On Sun, Nov 07, 1999 at 07:40:15PM -0800, Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
Hi. I am trying to get to the mutt website, http://www.mutt.org/.
The primary nameserver for mutt.org, ns.calyx.net, resolves www.mutt.org
to 194.70.126.33; however when I try to go to http://www.mutt.org/,
I get the web
On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 05:16:03PM -0800, Russell Van Tassell wrote:
Well, quite honestly, I've "disappeared" from the list because of an
overloaded mail server or mis-behaving/looping upstream relay (there's
been a couple of weird ones that, all told, lasted an hour or two)...
so I think
Due to some unforeseen work on the site where the servers hosting
the website and mailing lists for mutt.org, power is being turned
off from Sat 2am (GMT) through probably 6am.
This means there will be no access to the website or lists during
this time.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Steve
--
On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 09:28:29AM -0400, Ray Crane wrote:
I'm running Mutt 1.2.5i with IMAP support, in the unfortunate
condition of needing to use MS Exchange as the IMAP server.
(Corporate email, really tired of Outlook)
Something somewhere is clearly buggy, to the point of just
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 11:11:02AM -0600, Kelly Scroggins wrote:
I'm having a problem sending mail *OUT* of my Linux box. Recieving
mail works very well.
This problem just 'suddenly' appeared a month or two ago. Everything
worked very well for several months.
The Linux box is Red Hat 6.1,
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 11:21:41AM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
Steve Kennedy writes:
I dont know whether it's mutt or the mta, however someone
on the lists here was using mutt and generating a header
of the form
Message-ID: whatever.whatever@
Which was being rejected by lots of MTA's
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 11:32:07AM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
Not me, a list-user ... I just get the crap bounces ...
Oops, sorry, I misread your message. You are refering to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Still, what I posted applies. The problem can be remedied by setting
hostname explicitly in
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 07:02:04PM +, Glyn Millington wrote:
Hello! How do I get off this list? Can't find instructions anwhere!
send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
unsubscribe
in the body of the message
Steve
--
NetTek Ltd tel +44-(0)20 7483 1169 fax +44-(0)20 7483 2455
Flat 2,
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 09:10:01PM +, Glyn Millington wrote:
I recevie the mutt-users list in digest form- and it has been a
terrific help. But now I wish to unsubscribe. Steve Kennedy
helped me out with the suggestion that I mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe in the body
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:10:21PM -0600, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
Ah, oops. I must have misunderstood :)
Well, the gist I got from the subscription email that I got sent when I
joined, it only takes one bounced message for the list to unsubscribe
me. I guess if my mail server went down
SunOS 4.1.4 gcc 2.95.2
make[2]: Entering directory `/home2/ns/steve/mutt/mutt-1.3.24/imap'
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I../intl -I/usr/local/include -I../intl
-Wall -pedantic -O2 -c auth.c
In file included from ../protos.h:20,
from ../mutt.h:809,
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 12:24:36PM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mutt-devm=100288683121313w=2
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mutt-devm=100288714522738w=2
No that's fine, but shouldn't it be fixed somewhere ... it's been
around for a while ...
Steve
--
NetTek
If I get a pgp/gpg message I now get
[-- PGP output follows (current time: 11/30/01 13:08:07) --]
gpg: Signature made 11/30/01 12:08:21 GMT using DSA key ID 2125BB86
gpg: requesting key 2125BB86 from wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net ...
gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
gpg: Can't check signature: public
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 07:45:45PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% I would not design a production quality mail setup that relied on it
% if that is what you are asking.
Well, that's one way to answer it :-) I don't know enough to know
whether there are right and wrong ways to implement NFS so
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 12:43:17PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
Evolution is a new-style Personal Information Manager - that is,
Funnily it looks just like Outlook, which of course all the
MS hating geeks have been moaning about ;) So MS must have
got something right.
Steve
p.s. geek is
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 02:45:42PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
The company wide mailsystem is based on that product called
M$-Exchange-Server, and I am not able to change the mind of some
admins to use a linux box instead!
My question:
How can I communicate with that Exchange box to
Why does everyone send signed emails to the list, is it always
necessary ?
It slows reading down, and digests dont look so nice ...
I can understand that certain things should be signed, but it
seems more than not are now signed.
Steve
--
NetTek Ltd Flat 2, 43 Howitt Road, Belsize Park,
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 12:43:02PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
I would say to look at it like a mailing list signature that you have no
say in. Perhaps you could make procmail remove it, or otherwise modify
the mail, but other than that I think that you will have to live with
people
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 12:46:03PM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
I too seem to be suffering from random unsubscribtions. I hate the fact
that i don't get a message telling me I've been booted off, because I
have to wait for a day or two without getting any messages before I
realize
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 03:40:27PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
Of course :-)
What about the workaround of sending a probe and waiting to see if that
bounces, perhaps having sent it after a delay?
that would involve intelligence, and something more than majordomo
does at the moment.
Steve
--
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 08:32:24AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% mutt-1.2.5.1 and mutt-1.3.25 have just been released.
Didn't we see these come out already? Is this somehow different from the
Jan 01 message [EMAIL PROTECTED] (which
was PGP-MIME signed, I noted, while this one isn't)? It's not
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 05:56:07PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
This was a duplicate message apparently inserted at trymedia.com.
It's certainly not the version of the message I sent out.
Looks like someone re-injected. Next time I'll check more carefully.
Sorry (also can't find any
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:24:49AM -0600, John Buttery wrote:
gpg --verbose --keyserver certserverpgpcom --recv-keys 587F0CD702368857
Use something like keyserver wwwkeysukpgpnet in your options
file, where uk would be your country
Steve
--
NetTek Ltd Flat 2, 43 Howitt Road, Belsize Park,
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 10:29:48AM -0800, Bob McLaren wrote:
So now what I am looking for is a simple SMTP client that is as easy to use as
Mutt, or, some alternative means of getting Mutt to talk to my remote smtp server
ssmtp, or others
Steve
--
NetTek Ltd Flat 2, 43 Howitt Road,
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 10:05:08AM -0500, darren chamberlain wrote:
myself to this project. Also, someone mentioned earlier in the
thread that they could provide CVS space and mailing list support.
In other words, count me in.
Hosting another mutt list wouldn't be a problem here either.
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 08:55:08AM -0800, Carl B. Constantine wrote:
Well, if we're not reinventing the wheel, why not just ask the guy if
we can have a copy of his whole HTML and just include it with the mutt
distribution? I'm sure it's not very big on disk. Then just include
The mail (and web) servers have been migrated to a new platform,
hopefully all should be running smoothly, but let me know if there are
problems.
Steve
--
NetTek Ltd UK mob +44 7775 755503
UK +44 20 7993 2612 / US +1 310 857 7715 / Fax +44 20 7483 2455
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 09:13:50PM +0100, Christian Brabandt wrote:
Hi Steve!
On So, 10 Jan 2010, Steve Kennedy wrote:
The mail (and web) servers have been migrated to a new platform,
hopefully all should be running smoothly, but let me know if there are
problems.
I just want to take
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:22:08PM -0500, Tim Gray wrote:
Many mailing lists tuck links and addresses useful for list
management in the headers, like List-Unsubscribe and List-Help. I
looked around in the manual and in Google, but I couldn't find much.
I'm assuming this means mutt commands
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 12:16:52PM -0400, Russell Hoover wrote:
I am amazed that this list gets absolutely no spam.
How is this accomplished?
Perhaps some tricks cam be passed on to zsh-users,
which isn't nearly as air-tight when it comes to
spam-infestation.
Because it only allows people
Compile env.
./configure --with-homespool=Mailbox --with-domain=gbnet.net --enable-pop \
--enab le-imap --with-included-gettext --with-catgets --with-regex \
--enable-mailtool -- with-curses=/usr/local \
--with-libiconv-prefix=/usr/local --without-wc-funcs
gcc 2.95.2
ibintl.a -liconv -liconv
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 05:55:23PM +0200, Thomas Baker wrote:
I just checked cygwin.com and it would appear that the
Mutt 1.2.5i I already have is up-to-date. In my understanding,
the native WIN32 ports of Mutt are not as solid as the Cygwin
port.
Cygwin now has fetchmail as one of the
On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 03:39:46AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
error on FreeBSD 4.5... 1.3.27 built ok on this system.
no patches or anything... anyone else see an error like this, or should
i send a message to mutt-dev?
roland% ./configure --sysconfdir=/etc --enable-exact-address
[configure
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 01:17:57PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% This thing has happened for me twice or thrice already, so now I decided
% to ask what's going on. I am subscribed to this list, but on some
% occasions (the two or three incidents I mentioned) I have received an
% email where I
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 01:50:46PM -0600, Peter T. Abplanalp wrote:
i have mutt set up with gpg. when verifying a message, gpg gives the
following output:
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Wed Jun 5 13:45:19 2002) --]
gpg: Signature made Wed Jun 5 13:24:25 2002 MDT using DSA key ID
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 04:43:59PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
* David T-G [2002-06-06 16:15:42 CEST] wrote:
I forget how mutt-users is set up, but could you have
turned off metoo (in the list config, not muttrc) when you
weren't looking?
Hmm, I thought this list is run by majordomo. I've
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 02:02:26PM +0100, Dave Smith wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 02:20:09PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I start composing a new message to a mailing list?
The same way you compose a new message to a person - hit 'n' and type
the list address, e.g. [EMAIL
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 07:26:40AM -0400, PeterKorman wrote:
Who is the kind person responsible for the mutt.org
server?
Is it possible they lost a disk, or ran out of space,
or their firewall went kabluey now blocking everything?
Is is it now ok to post to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
since thats
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 02:42:54AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
* D. J. Bolderman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-29 23:24]:
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, John Iverson wrote:
I am recently only seeing list messages that are (mis)addressed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. And there is an error message at
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 12:42:28AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
* Kurt Lieber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-03 22:23]:
Is there a list charter anywhere for mutt-users? The
majordomo info was less than helpful (see mutt.org for info)
try
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 03:25:44PM +0200, Lukas Ruf wrote:
a few seconds ago, I wanted to re-subscribe under a different name on
http://www.mutt.org/mail-lists.html
A thing I did not like there was the way how you offer the different
mailing lists: You offer them as radio-buttons instead
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 04:33:55PM +0100, Fintan Gaughan wrote:
I can't get off this mailing list for love nor money :-(
Instructions are in the headers of EVERY message the list sends out. If
you kept the original subscription message, it also tells you how to un
sub.
Steve
--
NetTek Ltd
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 09:17:11AM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
I find myself in a tough situation. The mailserver at my work is
running Microsoft Exchange. For security reasons, the sysadmin says,
IMAP and POP are disabled. From what I understand, Exchange uses some
different
51 matches
Mail list logo
