On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 02:51:50PM +0800, Feng Liu wrote:
> This bothers me too. I'd rather use Fastmail instead since I suffered
> from this problem. Or just change the Gmail UI to English. This made me
> feel Gmail is not as good as it suppose to be.
If you wish I can share my .offlineimaprc
Hello Feng,
you should correct your GPG signature.
--
Michelle KonzackMiila ITSystems @ TDnet
GNU/Linux Developer 00372-54541400
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
This bothers me too. I'd rather use Fastmail instead since I suffered
from this problem. Or just change the Gmail UI to English. This made me
feel Gmail is not as good as it suppose to be.
在 2017年05月16日 16:14, Yubin Ruan 写道:
> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 09:33:46AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
>>
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:42:32PM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 16May2017 16:14, Yubin Ruan wrote:
> >On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 09:33:46AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> >>The other common solution for IMAP mail accounts is offlineimap, which will
> >>mirror IMAP
On 16May2017 16:14, Yubin Ruan wrote:
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 09:33:46AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
The other common solution for IMAP mail accounts is offlineimap, which will
mirror IMAP accounts to local storage.
[...]
Yes offlineimap _is_ very tricky to setup. It
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 09:33:46AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 13May2017 17:32, Yubin Ruan wrote:
> >I am wondering whether it is possible to tell mutt to prefetch mails folder
> >by
> >folder so that I can read mails more quickly without waiting for the
>
On 13May2017 20:43, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
On 2017-05-14 09:33, Cameron Simpson wrote:
The other common solution for IMAP mail accounts is offlineimap
After trying: direct IMAP access with mutt, offlineimap, maildirsync and
even git (no kidding!), I settled on unison for this
On 2017-05-14 09:33, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> The other common solution for IMAP mail accounts is offlineimap
After trying: direct IMAP access with mutt, offlineimap, maildirsync and
even git (no kidding!), I settled on unison for this purpose. It works
great for me. Of course unlike the IMAP
On 13May2017 17:32, Yubin Ruan wrote:
I am wondering whether it is possible to tell mutt to prefetch mails folder by
folder so that I can read mails more quickly without waiting for the "Fetching
mails..." every time.
I have set up mutt's cache, so it helps a little,
On 17-05-13 11:36:16, Chris Green wrote:
> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 05:32:43PM +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote:
> > I am wondering whether it is possible to tell mutt to prefetch mails
> > folder by folder so that I can read mails more quickly without
> > waiting for the "Fetching mails..." every time.
> >
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 05:32:43PM +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am wondering whether it is possible to tell mutt to prefetch mails folder by
> folder so that I can read mails more quickly without waiting for the "Fetching
> mails..." every time.
>
My solution for that is to run a
* Yubin Ruan [05-12-17 22:39]:
> Hi,
>
> I am wondering whether it is possible to tell mutt to prefetch mails folder by
> folder so that I can read mails more quickly without waiting for the "Fetching
> mails..." every time.
>
> I have set up mutt's cache, so it helps a
Hi,
I am wondering whether it is possible to tell mutt to prefetch mails folder by
folder so that I can read mails more quickly without waiting for the "Fetching
mails..." every time.
I have set up mutt's cache, so it helps a little, but it is still slow because I
have to fetch the mails before
13 matches
Mail list logo